Choi Soojeung, Karki Kunwor Sangita, Im Hyeabin, Choi Dain, Hwang Junghye, Ahmed Mansoor, Han Dongwoon
Department of Global Health and Development, Graduate School, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.
Institute of Health Services Management, Hanyang University, Seoul 04763, Republic of Korea.
Cancers (Basel). 2024 Sep 11;16(18):3130. doi: 10.3390/cancers16183130.
Globally, cancer patients frequently use T&CM during their treatment for various reasons. The primary concerns regarding the use of T&CM among cancer patients are the potential risks associated with interactions between pharmaceuticals and T&CM, as well as the risk of noncompliance with conventional cancer treatments. Despite the higher prevalence of T&CM use in Asia, driven by cultural, historical, and resource-related factors, no prior review has tried to estimate the prevalence and influencing factors of T&CM use and disclosure among cancer patients in this region. This study aims to examine the prevalence and disclosure rates of T&CM use among cancer patients in Asia to assess various factors influencing its use across different cancer treatment settings in Asia. Systematic research on T&CM use was conducted using four databases (PubMed, EMBASE, Web of Science, and CINAHAL) from inception to January 2023. Quality was assessed using the Appraisal Tool for Cross-Sectional Studies (AXIS). A random effects model was used to estimate the pooled prevalence of T&CM use, and data analysis was performed using Stata Version 16.0. Among the 4849 records retrieved, 41 eligible studies conducted in 14 Asian countries were included, involving a total of 14,976 participants. The pooled prevalence of T&CM use was 49.3%, ranging from 24.0% to 94.8%, and the disclosure rate of T&CM use was 38.2% (11.9% to 82.5%). The most commonly used T&CM modalities were herbal medicines and traditional medicine. Females were 22.0% more likely to use T&CM than males. A subgroup analysis revealed the highest prevalence of T&CM use was found in studies conducted in East Asia (62.4%) and those covered by both national and private insurance (55.8%). The disclosure rate of T&CM use to physicians remains low. Moreover, the factors influencing this disclosure are still insufficiently explored. Since the disclosure of T&CM use is a crucial indicator of patient safety and the quality of cancer treatment prognosis, future research should focus on identifying the determinants of non-disclosure.
在全球范围内,癌症患者出于各种原因在治疗期间经常使用传统中医药(T&CM)。癌症患者使用传统中医药的主要担忧是药物与传统中医药相互作用带来的潜在风险,以及不遵守传统癌症治疗的风险。尽管在文化、历史和资源相关因素的推动下,亚洲使用传统中医药的比例更高,但此前没有综述试图估计该地区癌症患者使用和披露传统中医药的比例及影响因素。本研究旨在调查亚洲癌症患者使用传统中医药的比例和披露率,以评估影响其在亚洲不同癌症治疗环境中使用的各种因素。使用四个数据库(PubMed、EMBASE、科学网和护理学与健康领域数据库)对传统中医药的使用进行了从开始到2023年1月的系统研究。使用横断面研究评估工具(AXIS)评估质量。采用随机效应模型估计传统中医药使用的合并比例,并使用Stata 16.0版进行数据分析。在检索到的4849条记录中,纳入了在14个亚洲国家进行的41项符合条件的研究,共涉及14976名参与者。传统中医药使用的合并比例为49.3%,范围从24.0%到94.8%,传统中医药使用的披露率为38.2%(11.9%至82.5%)。最常用的传统中医药方式是草药和传统药物。女性使用传统中医药的可能性比男性高22.0%。亚组分析显示,在东亚进行的研究(62.4%)以及由国家和私人保险覆盖的研究(55.8%)中,传统中医药使用的比例最高。向医生披露使用传统中医药的比例仍然很低。此外,影响这种披露的因素仍未得到充分探索。由于披露使用传统中医药是患者安全和癌症治疗预后质量的关键指标,未来的研究应侧重于确定不披露的决定因素。