• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

常规玻璃离子水门汀(Ⅱ型)、儿童玻璃离子水门汀(Ⅸ型)和 Cention-N 的氟释放和再矿化能力的比较评价:一项体外研究。

A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and rechargeability in conventional GIC (type II), pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N: an in vitro study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatric and Preventive Dentistry, Rishiraj College of Dental Sciences and Research Center, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.

Department of Chemical Engineering, Maulana Azad National Institute of Technology, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, 462003, India.

出版信息

Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;25(2):161-168. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5. Epub 2024 Feb 9.

DOI:10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5
PMID:38334867
Abstract

PURPOSE

A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-chargeability in conventional glass ionomer cement (GIC) (type II), Pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N-an in vitro study at an interval of first, fourteenth, and twenty first days.

METHODS

Three groups of test materials, each with twenty samples, were prepared. Measurements of the cumulative fluoride release [parts per million (ppm)] and re-release measured on the first, fourteenth, and twenty first days. Analysis of variance (ANOVA) was used to compare the means for different readings, and Tukey's post hoc analysis was used to compare each group with each other.

RESULTS

Initial and subsequent fluoride release of Cention-N at days one, fourteen, and twenty-one were all noticeably higher than those of conventional and pediatric GIC.

CONCLUSION

Compared to the Conventional and Pediatric GIC restorative materials, Cention-N was more effective in the initial and fluoride re-release.

摘要

目的

在第 1、14 和 21 天的间隔内,对传统玻璃离子水门汀(GIC)(类型 II)、儿童 GIC(类型 IX)和 Cention-N-an 进行体外比较氟化物释放和再充电能力的评估。

方法

制备了三组测试材料,每组 20 个样本。测量了第 1、14 和 21 天的累积氟化物释放量(ppm)和再释放量。采用方差分析(ANOVA)比较不同读数的平均值,并采用 Tukey 事后分析比较各组之间的差异。

结果

在第 1、14 和 21 天,Cention-N 的初始和后续氟化物释放均明显高于传统和儿童 GIC。

结论

与传统和儿童 GIC 修复材料相比,Cention-N 在初始和氟化物再释放方面更有效。

相似文献

1
A comparative evaluation of fluoride release and rechargeability in conventional GIC (type II), pediatric GIC (type IX), and Cention-N: an in vitro study.常规玻璃离子水门汀(Ⅱ型)、儿童玻璃离子水门汀(Ⅸ型)和 Cention-N 的氟释放和再矿化能力的比较评价:一项体外研究。
Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2024 Apr;25(2):161-168. doi: 10.1007/s40368-023-00856-5. Epub 2024 Feb 9.
2
Fluoride release from two types of fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives: Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements-An in vitro study.两种含氟正畸粘接剂的氟释放:传统型与树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀——一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247716. eCollection 2021.
3
Properties of a proline-containing glass ionomer dental cement.一种含有脯氨酸的玻璃离子体牙科水门汀的性能。
J Prosthet Dent. 2013 Nov;110(5):408-13. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2013.04.009. Epub 2013 Aug 30.
4
An In Vitro Evaluation of the Mechanical Properties and Fluoride-releasing Ability of a New Self-cure Filling Material.一种新型自固化填充材料机械性能和释氟能力的体外评估。
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2021 Feb 1;22(2):134-139.
5
Fluoride rechargability of a non-resin auto-cured glass ionomer cement from a fluoridated dentifrice: an in vitro study.含氟牙膏对一种非树脂自凝玻璃离子水门汀的氟再充注能力:一项体外研究
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2011 Jul-Sep;29(3):202-4. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.85812.
6
Prevention of secondary caries using fluoride-loaded chitosan nanoparticle-modified glass-ionomer cement.使用载氟壳聚糖纳米粒子修饰的玻璃离子水门汀预防继发龋。
Clin Oral Investig. 2024 Aug 28;28(9):504. doi: 10.1007/s00784-024-05891-0.
7
Comparative evaluation of fluoride release from hydroxyapatite incorporated and conventional glass ionomer cement: an in vitro study.含羟基磷灰石的传统玻璃离子水门汀氟释放的比较评价:一项体外研究。
J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2012 Oct-Dec;30(4):284-7. doi: 10.4103/0970-4388.108921.
8
Antibacterial and physical properties of EGCG-containing glass ionomer cements.含表没食子儿茶素没食子酸酯的玻璃离子水门汀的抗菌性能及物理性能
J Dent. 2013 Oct;41(10):927-34. doi: 10.1016/j.jdent.2013.07.014. Epub 2013 Aug 1.
9
Fluoride release/uptake from newer glass-ionomer cements used with the ART approach.采用非创伤性修复治疗(ART)方法使用的新型玻璃离子水门汀的氟释放/吸收情况。
Am J Dent. 2000 Aug;13(4):201-4.
10
The uptake and release of fluoride by ion-leaching cements after exposure to toothpaste.离子浸出水泥在接触牙膏后对氟化物的吸收与释放
J Dent. 1998 Sep;26(7):591-7. doi: 10.1016/s0300-5712(97)00035-3.

引用本文的文献

1
Vitamin D deficiency among pregnant women in India.印度孕妇中的维生素D缺乏情况。
Bioinformation. 2024 Dec 31;20(12):2029-2033. doi: 10.6026/9732063002002029. eCollection 2024.
2
Comparative evaluation of fluoride release profiles in new glass ionomer cements and conventional type II GIC: Implications for cariostatic efficacy.新型玻璃离子水门汀与传统II型玻璃离子水门汀氟释放曲线的比较评估:对防龋效果的影响。
Bioinformation. 2024 Dec 31;20(12):2009-2014. doi: 10.6026/9732063002002009. eCollection 2024.
3
Green Synthesis and Investigation of Antimicrobial Activity and Compressive Resilience of Glass Ionomer Cement Modified With Zirconia Nanoparticles: An In Vitro Study.

本文引用的文献

1
Fluoride release from two types of fluoride-containing orthodontic adhesives: Conventional versus resin-modified glass ionomer cements-An in vitro study.两种含氟正畸粘接剂的氟释放:传统型与树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀——一项体外研究。
PLoS One. 2021 Feb 26;16(2):e0247716. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0247716. eCollection 2021.
2
Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and re-release and recharge potential of Zirconomer Improved and Cention.Zirconomer Improved和Cention的氟释放、再释放及再充电潜力的比较评估
J Conserv Dent. 2020 Jul-Aug;23(4):402-406. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_222_20. Epub 2021 Jan 16.
3
Comparative Evaluation of Mechanical and Microleakage Properties of Cention-N, Composite, and Glass Ionomer Cement Restorative Materials.
氧化锆纳米颗粒改性玻璃离子水门汀的绿色合成及其抗菌活性和抗压弹性的研究:一项体外研究
Cureus. 2024 Jun 21;16(6):e62837. doi: 10.7759/cureus.62837. eCollection 2024 Jun.
Cention-N、复合树脂和玻璃离子水门汀修复材料的力学性能和微渗漏性能的比较评估
J Contemp Dent Pract. 2020 Jun 1;21(6):691-695.
4
Comparison of Fluoride Release in Conventional Glass-Ionomer Cements with a New Mechanical Mixing Cement.传统玻璃离子水门汀与新型机械搅拌水门汀氟释放量的比较。
Oral Health Prev Dent. 2020 Jul 4;18(2):319-323. doi: 10.3290/j.ohpd.a44034.
5
The forgotten merits of GIC restorations: a systematic review.玻璃离子水门汀修复体被遗忘的优点:系统评价。
Clin Oral Investig. 2020 Jul;24(7):2189-2201. doi: 10.1007/s00784-020-03334-0. Epub 2020 Jun 8.
6
The Influence of Mixing Methods on the Compressive Strength and Fluoride Release of Conventional and Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements.混合方法对传统型和树脂改性玻璃离子水门汀抗压强度及氟释放的影响
Int J Dent. 2019 Sep 15;2019:6834931. doi: 10.1155/2019/6834931. eCollection 2019.
7
Comparison of fluoride ion release and alkalizing potential of a new bulk-fill alkasite.新型大块充填碱式玻璃离子体的氟离子释放及碱化潜力比较
J Conserv Dent. 2019 May-Jun;22(3):296-299. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_74_19.
8
Comparative evaluation of fluoride release and recharge potential of novel and traditional fluoride-releasing restorative materials: An study.新型和传统释氟修复材料氟释放及再充氟潜力的比较评估:一项研究。
J Conserv Dent. 2018 Nov-Dec;21(6):622-626. doi: 10.4103/JCD.JCD_338_18.
9
Characterization of fluoride releasing restorative dental materials.含氟牙科修复材料的特性研究
Dent Mater J. 2018 Mar 30;37(2):293-300. doi: 10.4012/dmj.2017-161. Epub 2017 Dec 27.
10
A Review of Glass-Ionomer Cements for Clinical Dentistry.玻璃离子水门汀在临床牙科中的应用综述。
J Funct Biomater. 2016 Jun 28;7(3):16. doi: 10.3390/jfb7030016.