• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

医源性颈段食管和咽下部穿孔的处理和预后

Management and prognosis of iatrogenic perforations of the cervical oesophagus and hypopharynx.

机构信息

Department of Otolaryngology - Head and Neck Surgery, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel.

Department of Orthopedic Surgery, Rabin Medical Center - Beilinson Hospital, Petach Tikva, Israel.

出版信息

Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024 Aug;44(4):214-222. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2905.

DOI:10.14639/0392-100X-N2905
PMID:39347546
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11441517/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

The study aimed to identify factors affecting the management and prognosis of iatrogenic cervical oesophageal and hypopharyngeal perforations (iCEHPs).

METHODS

We retrospectively analysed 24 patients treated for iCEHP between 2004 and 2021 at a tertiary university medical centre. Data on demographics, clinical features, imaging, management and outcomes were collected. Factors associated with primary management and patient outcome were assessed.

RESULTS

The most common management approach was surgical neck exploration (15 patients, 62.5%). Surgical management was used in 93% of uncontained perforations compared to 11% of contained perforations (p < 0.001). Surgically-treated patients had higher levels of C-reactive protein (CRP) than conservatively-treated patients (median, 18.3 4.8 mg/dL; p = 0.001). Delayed diagnosis (≥ 24 hours) was associated with increased mortality (100 5%; p = 0.011). The mortality rate was significantly higher in patients who had a history of neck irradiation than in patients who did not (67 5%; p = 0.032).

CONCLUSIONS

Early diagnosis of iCEHP improves outcomes. The appropriate management should be carefully selected on the basis of CRP level and imaging findings. Prior neck radiation is a poor prognostic factor.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在确定影响医源性颈食管和下咽穿孔(iCEHPs)管理和预后的因素。

方法

我们回顾性分析了 2004 年至 2021 年在一家三级大学医学中心治疗的 24 例 iCEHP 患者。收集了人口统计学、临床特征、影像学、管理和结果的数据。评估了与主要管理和患者结局相关的因素。

结果

最常见的管理方法是手术颈探查(15 例,62.5%)。与 11%的封闭性穿孔相比,93%的未封闭性穿孔采用手术治疗(p < 0.001)。手术治疗患者的 C 反应蛋白(CRP)水平高于保守治疗患者(中位数,18.3 ± 4.8 mg/dL;p = 0.001)。延迟诊断(≥24 小时)与死亡率增加相关(100% 5%;p = 0.011)。有颈部放疗史的患者死亡率明显高于无颈部放疗史的患者(67% 5%;p = 0.032)。

结论

早期诊断 iCEHP 可改善预后。应根据 CRP 水平和影像学发现仔细选择适当的治疗方法。既往颈部放疗是预后不良的一个因素。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c8/11441517/2d93c2595bce/aoi-2024-04-214-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c8/11441517/3a7e50692a58/aoi-2024-04-214-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c8/11441517/8f4d2b7a8baf/aoi-2024-04-214-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c8/11441517/2d93c2595bce/aoi-2024-04-214-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c8/11441517/3a7e50692a58/aoi-2024-04-214-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c8/11441517/8f4d2b7a8baf/aoi-2024-04-214-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/d5c8/11441517/2d93c2595bce/aoi-2024-04-214-g003.jpg

相似文献

1
Management and prognosis of iatrogenic perforations of the cervical oesophagus and hypopharynx.医源性颈段食管和咽下部穿孔的处理和预后
Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital. 2024 Aug;44(4):214-222. doi: 10.14639/0392-100X-N2905.
2
Management of hypopharyngeal and cervical oesophageal perforations.下咽及颈段食管穿孔的处理
Auris Nasus Larynx. 2003 May;30(2):175-82. doi: 10.1016/s0385-8146(03)00042-7.
3
[Iatrogenic perforations of the esophagus and hypopharynx--5 year experience at the Center for Esophageal Surgery].[医源性食管和下咽穿孔——食管外科中心的5年经验]
Acta Chir Iugosl. 2004;51(1):93-101. doi: 10.2298/aci0401093s.
4
Cervical oesophageal and hypopharyngeal perforations after anterior cervical spine surgery salvaged with regional and free flaps.颈椎前路手术后颈段食管和下咽穿孔采用区域性和游离皮瓣挽救。
Neurol Neurochir Pol. 2013 Jan-Feb;47(1):43-8. doi: 10.5114/ninp.2013.32929.
5
Management of cervical esophageal and hypopharyngeal perforations.颈段食管和下咽穿孔的处理
Am J Otolaryngol. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):678-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
6
[Perforation and rupture of the oesophagus: treatment and prognosis].[食管穿孔与破裂:治疗与预后]
Ann Chir. 2003 Apr;128(3):163-6. doi: 10.1016/s0003-3944(03)00035-x.
7
[Surgical treatment of iatrogenic perforations of the distal third of the esophagus. Personal experience].[食管远端三分之一医源性穿孔的外科治疗。个人经验]
Minerva Chir. 2006 Oct;61(5):367-71.
8
[Esophageal perforation: which factors affect the prognosis? Results of a 10-year experience].[食管穿孔:哪些因素影响预后?十年经验结果]
Chir Ital. 2006 Sep-Oct;58(5):577-81.
9
Single-centre review of the management of intra-thoracic oesophageal perforation in a tertiary oesophageal unit: paradigm shift, short- and long-term outcomes over 15 years.单中心回顾性研究:15 年来三级食管疾病诊疗中心胸腔内食管穿孔的治疗:观念转变,短期和长期结果。
Surg Endosc. 2023 Mar;37(3):1710-1717. doi: 10.1007/s00464-022-09682-0. Epub 2022 Oct 7.
10
Management of perforations of the hypopharynx and cervical esophagus.下咽和颈段食管穿孔的处理
Laryngoscope. 1985 Aug;95(8):939-41. doi: 10.1288/00005537-198508000-00011.

引用本文的文献

1
Successful Management of a Parapharyngeal Abscess With Pharyngeal Perforation and Internal Jugular Vein Thrombosis in a Patient With a History of Lymphoma.一名有淋巴瘤病史的患者,其咽旁脓肿合并咽穿孔及颈内静脉血栓形成的成功治疗
Cureus. 2025 Mar 4;17(3):e80031. doi: 10.7759/cureus.80031. eCollection 2025 Mar.
2
Pharyngeal perforations after anterior cervical spinal procedures: A systematic review.颈椎前路手术后的咽穿孔:一项系统评价。
Heliyon. 2024 Dec 26;11(1):e41466. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e41466. eCollection 2025 Jan 15.

本文引用的文献

1
The insidious presentation and challenging management of esophageal perforation following diagnostic and therapeutic interventions.诊断和治疗性干预后食管穿孔的隐匿性表现及具有挑战性的处理
J Thorac Dis. 2020 May;12(5):2724-2734. doi: 10.21037/jtd-19-4096.
2
Management of Iatrogenic Cervical Esophageal Perforations: A Narrative Review.医源性颈段食管穿孔的处理:叙述性综述。
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2020 May 1;146(5):488-494. doi: 10.1001/jamaoto.2020.0088.
3
Causes and outcomes of markedly elevated C-reactive protein levels.
C反应蛋白水平显著升高的原因及后果。
Can Fam Physician. 2017 Jun;63(6):e316-e323.
4
Epidemiology, diagnosis, and management of esophageal perforations: systematic review.食管穿孔的流行病学、诊断与管理:系统评价
Dis Esophagus. 2017 Aug 1;30(8):1-6. doi: 10.1093/dote/dox013.
5
Management of Esophageal and Pharyngeal Perforation as Complications of Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery.颈椎前路手术并发症食管及咽穿孔的处理
World Neurosurg. 2017 Jun;102:275-283. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2017.02.130. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
6
Management of Esophageal Perforation in Adults.成人食管穿孔的管理
Gastroenterology Res. 2010 Dec;3(6):235-244. doi: 10.4021/gr263w. Epub 2010 Nov 20.
7
The Third International Consensus Definitions for Sepsis and Septic Shock (Sepsis-3).《脓毒症及脓毒性休克第三次国际共识定义(脓毒症-3)》
JAMA. 2016 Feb 23;315(8):801-10. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.0287.
8
Esophageal perforation after anterior cervical surgery: a review of the literature for over half a century with a demonstrative case and a proposed novel algorithm.颈椎前路手术后食管穿孔:半个多世纪文献综述并附1例示范病例及一种新的算法建议
Eur Spine J. 2016 Jul;25(7):2037-49. doi: 10.1007/s00586-016-4394-7. Epub 2016 Feb 2.
9
Management of cervical esophageal and hypopharyngeal perforations.颈段食管和下咽穿孔的处理
Am J Otolaryngol. 2015 Sep-Oct;36(5):678-85. doi: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2015.06.001. Epub 2015 Jun 9.
10
Why Summary Comorbidity Measures Such As the Charlson Comorbidity Index and Elixhauser Score Work.为何诸如查尔森合并症指数和埃利克斯豪泽评分等合并症简易测量方法有效。
Med Care. 2015 Sep;53(9):e65-72. doi: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318297429c.