Institute of Medical Information/Medical Library, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Sep 30;12:e60293. doi: 10.2196/60293.
Data element repositories facilitate high-quality medical data sharing by standardizing data and enhancing semantic interoperability. However, the application of repositories is confined to specific projects and institutions.
This study aims to explore potential issues and promote broader application of data element repositories within the medical field by evaluating and analyzing typical repositories.
Following the inclusion of 5 data element repositories through a literature review, a novel analysis framework consisting of 7 dimensions and 36 secondary indicators was constructed and used for evaluation and analysis.
The study's results delineate the unique characteristics of different repositories and uncover specific issues in their construction. These issues include the absence of data reuse protocols and insufficient information regarding the application scenarios and efficacy of data elements. The repositories fully comply with only 45% (9/20) of the subprinciples for Findable and Reusable in the FAIR principle, while achieving a 90% (19/20 subprinciples) compliance rate for Accessible and 67% (10/15 subprinciples) for Interoperable.
The recommendations proposed in this study address the issues to improve the construction and application of repositories, offering valuable insights to data managers, computer experts, and other pertinent stakeholders.
数据元素知识库通过标准化数据和增强语义互操作性,促进高质量的医疗数据共享。然而,知识库的应用仅限于特定的项目和机构。
本研究旨在通过评估和分析典型的知识库,探讨数据元素知识库在医学领域更广泛应用的潜在问题。
通过文献回顾纳入 5 个数据元素知识库后,构建了一个由 7 个维度和 36 个二级指标组成的新分析框架,用于评估和分析。
研究结果描绘了不同知识库的独特特征,并揭示了其构建中的具体问题。这些问题包括缺乏数据重用协议以及关于数据元素应用场景和效果的信息不足。这些知识库仅完全符合 FAIR 原则中可发现和可重用的 45%(9/20)的子原则,而在可访问性方面达到了 90%(20 个子原则中的 19 个),在互操作性方面达到了 67%(15 个子原则中的 10 个)。
本研究提出的建议旨在解决知识库构建和应用中的问题,为数据管理者、计算机专家和其他相关利益相关者提供有价值的见解。