• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

通过超声处理对两种设计用于剥离石墨烯的探针效果进行实验比较。

Experimental comparison of the effects of the two designed probes for exfoliation of graphene by sonication.

作者信息

Khalili Drermani Ensiyeh, Afzalzadeh Reza

机构信息

Faculty of Physics, K. N. Toosi University of Technology, Tehran, 15418-49611, Iran.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72120-9.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-72120-9
PMID:39349933
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11442802/
Abstract

In the present research, comparative simulation and experimental investigation were carried out for two different probes to improve the efficiency and quality of few-layer graphene utilizing liquid-phase exfoliation. Two differently designed shaped probes are fabricated for this study, i.e., a simple probe and a stepped probe. The acoustic pressure distribution in the vessel is simulated for both probes at different output powers. In the experiment, both probes exfoliate graphite powder in a mixture of deionized water and ethanol. Different sonication times and output power were studied for different pulse modes. The graphene layers were characterized using Ultraviolet-visible spectroscopy (UV‒Vis), Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM), Transmission Electron Microscopy (TEM), and Raman Microscope. The simulation shows that the total displacement on the tip of the stepped probe is 5.7% greater than that of the simple probe. Also, the pressure difference produced by the stepped probe is 9.15 × 10 pa compared to the pressure difference of the simple probe which is 8.23 × 10 pa. Consequently, the stepped probe was more effective in exfoliating graphene. The experimental results show that the absorbance peak in the stepped probe is approximately 32% greater than the absorbance peak in the simple probe with the same output power. Also, the graphene with better quality is produced with the stepped probe compared to the simple probe, which verifies the simulation findings. Additionally, the optimum output power, pulse duration, and sonication time to produce graphene with less time and energy consumption are obtained. The best graphene flakes were obtained via sonication with a pulse duration of 0.7 s, an output power of 282 W, and a sonication time of 45 min using a stepped probe. UV-Vis., SEM and TEM analysis show increases in quantity and quality of the exfoliated flakes. These results are approved by the peak ratio of I/I around 1 in Raman spectra revealed the production of the few-layer graphene by the simple probe and the bilayer graphene by the stepped probe. So, this method is suitable for the production of graphene flakes from graphite in suitable quantity and quality.

摘要

在本研究中,对两种不同的探头进行了对比模拟和实验研究,以提高利用液相剥离法制备少层石墨烯的效率和质量。为此研究制作了两种不同设计形状的探头,即简单探头和阶梯式探头。针对两种探头在不同输出功率下模拟了容器内的声压分布。在实验中,两种探头均在去离子水和乙醇的混合液中剥离石墨粉。针对不同的脉冲模式研究了不同的超声处理时间和输出功率。使用紫外可见光谱(UV-Vis)、扫描电子显微镜(SEM)、透射电子显微镜(TEM)和拉曼显微镜对石墨烯层进行了表征。模拟结果表明,阶梯式探头尖端的总位移比简单探头大5.7%。此外,阶梯式探头产生的压差为9.15×10帕,而简单探头的压差为8.23×10帕。因此,阶梯式探头在剥离石墨烯方面更有效。实验结果表明,在相同输出功率下,阶梯式探头的吸光度峰值比简单探头大约32%。此外,与简单探头相比,阶梯式探头制备的石墨烯质量更好,这验证了模拟结果。此外,还获得了以更少的时间和能量消耗制备石墨烯的最佳输出功率、脉冲持续时间和超声处理时间。使用阶梯式探头,在脉冲持续时间为0.7秒、输出功率为282瓦、超声处理时间为45分钟的条件下,通过超声处理获得了最佳的石墨烯薄片。紫外可见光谱、扫描电子显微镜和透射电子显微镜分析表明,剥离薄片的数量和质量有所增加。拉曼光谱中I/I的峰值比约为1,证实了简单探头制备出了少层石墨烯,阶梯式探头制备出了双层石墨烯,从而验证了这些结果。所以,该方法适用于以合适的数量和质量从石墨制备石墨烯薄片。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/12c4211b95fa/41598_2024_72120_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/53a1a4c08b6e/41598_2024_72120_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/abb74daba594/41598_2024_72120_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/29e47a54bb15/41598_2024_72120_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/22cc6f17d217/41598_2024_72120_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/98d7bdeec6e2/41598_2024_72120_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/759948ac7cd2/41598_2024_72120_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/b1e6fa056c3e/41598_2024_72120_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/b8d57dd2c4f6/41598_2024_72120_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/8e5f99572b92/41598_2024_72120_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/aa96f8e87ec0/41598_2024_72120_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/bb74d0227b67/41598_2024_72120_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/7da97da3a297/41598_2024_72120_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/12c4211b95fa/41598_2024_72120_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/53a1a4c08b6e/41598_2024_72120_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/abb74daba594/41598_2024_72120_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/29e47a54bb15/41598_2024_72120_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/22cc6f17d217/41598_2024_72120_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/98d7bdeec6e2/41598_2024_72120_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/759948ac7cd2/41598_2024_72120_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/b1e6fa056c3e/41598_2024_72120_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/b8d57dd2c4f6/41598_2024_72120_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/8e5f99572b92/41598_2024_72120_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/aa96f8e87ec0/41598_2024_72120_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/bb74d0227b67/41598_2024_72120_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/7da97da3a297/41598_2024_72120_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6ad3/11442802/12c4211b95fa/41598_2024_72120_Fig13_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Experimental comparison of the effects of the two designed probes for exfoliation of graphene by sonication.通过超声处理对两种设计用于剥离石墨烯的探针效果进行实验比较。
Sci Rep. 2024 Sep 30;14(1):22682. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-72120-9.
2
Verification of experimental results with simulation on production of few-layer graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation utilizing sonication.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 14;12(1):9872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10971-w.
3
Effects of Tip Sonication Parameters on Liquid Phase Exfoliation of Graphite into Graphene Nanoplatelets.尖端超声处理参数对石墨液相剥离成石墨烯纳米片的影响。
Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018 Aug 17;13(1):241. doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2648-5.
4
Liquid Phase Graphene Exfoliation with a Vibration-Based Acoustofluidic Effector.基于振动的声流体效应器的液相石墨烯剥离
Micromachines (Basel). 2023 Aug 31;14(9):1718. doi: 10.3390/mi14091718.
5
Environmental Synthesis of Few Layers Graphene Sheets Using Ultrasonic Exfoliation with Enhanced Electrical and Thermal Properties.利用超声剥离法进行环境合成少数层石墨烯片及其增强的电学和热学性能
PLoS One. 2016 Apr 11;11(4):e0152699. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0152699. eCollection 2016.
6
Temperature as a key parameter for graphene sono-exfoliation in water.温度作为水中石墨烯超声剥离的关键参数。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2022 Nov;90:106187. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106187. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
7
Graphene nanosheets preparation using magnetic nanoparticle assisted liquid phase exfoliation of graphite: The coupled effect of ultrasound and wedging nanoparticles.使用磁性纳米颗粒辅助石墨液相剥离制备石墨烯纳米片:超声与楔入纳米颗粒的耦合效应
Ultrason Sonochem. 2018 Jun;44:204-214. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.02.028. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
8
Graphene Quantum Dots Based on Mechanical Exfoliation Methods: A Simple and Eco-Friendly Technique.基于机械剥离法的石墨烯量子点:一种简单且环保的技术。
ACS Omega. 2024 Jul 12;9(29):31427-31437. doi: 10.1021/acsomega.4c00453. eCollection 2024 Jul 23.
9
Higher Ultrasonic Frequency Liquid Phase Exfoliation Leads to Larger and Monolayer to Few-Layer Flakes of 2D Layered Materials.更高超声频率的液相剥离可产生更大尺寸且从单层到少层的二维层状材料薄片。
Langmuir. 2021 Apr 20;37(15):4504-4514. doi: 10.1021/acs.langmuir.0c03668. Epub 2021 Mar 16.
10
Curcumin-assisted ultrasound exfoliation of graphite to graphene in ethanol.乙醇中姜黄素辅助超声剥离石墨制备石墨烯。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2018 Nov;48:96-102. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2018.05.010. Epub 2018 May 22.

本文引用的文献

1
Influence of the ultrasound cavitation intensity on reduced graphene oxide functionalization.超声空化强度对还原氧化石墨烯功能化的影响。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2022 Nov;90:106212. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106212. Epub 2022 Oct 26.
2
Temperature as a key parameter for graphene sono-exfoliation in water.温度作为水中石墨烯超声剥离的关键参数。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2022 Nov;90:106187. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2022.106187. Epub 2022 Sep 30.
3
Verification of experimental results with simulation on production of few-layer graphene by liquid-phase exfoliation utilizing sonication.
Sci Rep. 2022 Jun 14;12(1):9872. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-10971-w.
4
Sensitive Transfer-Free Wafer-Scale Graphene Microphones.灵敏的无转移晶圆级石墨烯麦克风。
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022 May 11;14(18):21705-21712. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c03305. Epub 2022 Apr 27.
5
Tunable Graphene/Nitrocellulose Temperature Alarm Sensors.可调谐石墨烯/硝化纤维素温度报警传感器
ACS Appl Mater Interfaces. 2022 Mar 23;14(11):13790-13800. doi: 10.1021/acsami.2c02340. Epub 2022 Mar 11.
6
Method of ultrasound-assisted liquid-phase exfoliation to prepare graphene.超声辅助液相剥离法制备石墨烯。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2019 Nov;58:104630. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.104630. Epub 2019 Jun 8.
7
Controlled Sonication as a Route to in-situ Graphene Flake Size Control.可控超声处理:一种原位控制石墨烯薄片尺寸的方法
Sci Rep. 2019 Jun 18;9(1):8710. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-45059-5.
8
A novel 'bottom-up' synthesis of few- and multi-layer graphene platelets with partial oxidation via cavitation.一种通过空化作用对少层和多层石墨烯薄片进行部分氧化的新型“自下而上”合成方法。
Ultrason Sonochem. 2019 Sep;56:466-473. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2019.03.020. Epub 2019 Mar 28.
9
Efficient Production of High-Quality Few-Layer Graphene Using a Simple Hydrodynamic-Assisted Exfoliation Method.使用简单的流体动力学辅助剥离法高效生产高质量少层石墨烯
Nanoscale Res Lett. 2018 Dec 27;13(1):416. doi: 10.1186/s11671-018-2830-9.
10
State of the art and recent advances in the ultrasound-assisted synthesis, exfoliation and functionalization of graphene derivatives.石墨烯衍生物的超声辅助合成、剥离及功能化的研究现状与最新进展
Ultrason Sonochem. 2017 Nov;39:478-493. doi: 10.1016/j.ultsonch.2017.05.019. Epub 2017 May 15.