• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用消费级腕戴设备检测久坐时间和时段:一种隐半马尔可夫模型。

Detection of sedentary time and bouts using consumer-grade wrist-worn devices: a hidden semi-Markov model.

机构信息

Baker Heart & Diabetes Institute, Melbourne, Australia.

Centre for Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Melbourne School of Population and Global Health, The University of Melbourne, Melbourne, Australia.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02311-5.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02311-5
PMID:39350114
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11440759/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Wrist-worn data from commercially available devices has potential to characterize sedentary time for research and for clinical and public health applications. We propose a model that utilizes heart rate in addition to step count data to estimate the proportion of time spent being sedentary and the usual length of sedentary bouts.

METHODS

We developed and trained two Hidden semi-Markov models, STEPHEN (STEP and Heart ENcoder) and STEPCODE (STEP enCODEr; a steps-only based model) using consumer-grade Fitbit device data from participants under free living conditions, and validated model performance using two external datasets. We used the median absolute percentage error (MDAPE) to measure the accuracy of the proposed models against research-grade activPAL device data as the referent. Bland-Altman plots summarized the individual-level agreement with activPAL.

RESULTS

In OPTIMISE cohort, STEPHEN's estimates of the proportion of time spent sedentary had significantly (p < 0.001) better accuracy (MDAPE [IQR] = 0.15 [0.06-0.25] vs. 0.23 [0.13-0.53)]) and agreement (Bias Mean [SD]=-0.03[0.11] vs. 0.14 [0.11]) than the proprietary software, estimated the usual sedentary bout duration more accurately (MDAPE[IQR] = 0.11[0.06-0.26] vs. 0.42[0.32-0.48]), and had better agreement (Bias Mean [SD] = 3.91[5.67] minutes vs. -11.93[5.07] minutes). With the ALLO-Active dataset, STEPHEN and STEPCODE did not improve the estimation of proportion of time spent sedentary, but STEPHEN estimated usual sedentary bout duration more accurately than the proprietary software (MDAPE[IQR] = 0.19[0.03-0.25] vs. 0.36[0.15-0.48]) and had smaller bias (Bias Mean[SD] = 0.70[8.89] minutes vs. -11.35[9.17] minutes).

CONCLUSIONS

STEPHEN can characterize the proportion of time spent being sedentary and usual sedentary bout length. The methodology is available as an open access R package available from https://github.com/limfuxing/stephen/ . The package includes trained models, but users have the flexibility to train their own models.

摘要

背景

可穿戴设备腕部数据具有对研究以及临床和公共卫生应用中久坐时间进行特征描述的潜力。我们提出了一种利用心率和计步数据估算久坐时间比例和典型久坐时间长度的模型。

方法

我们使用消费者级别的 Fitbit 设备数据,在自由生活条件下开发和训练了两个隐半马尔可夫模型,分别为 STEPHEN(步频和心率编码器)和 STEPCODE(基于步频的编码器),并使用两个外部数据集验证了模型性能。我们使用中值绝对百分比误差(MDAPE)来衡量与研究级 activPAL 设备数据(作为参考)相比,提出模型的准确性。Bland-Altman 图总结了与 activPAL 的个体水平一致性。

结果

在 OPTIMISE 队列中,STEPHEN 估算的久坐时间比例具有更高的准确性(MDAPE[IQR] = 0.15[0.06-0.25] 与 0.23[0.13-0.53])和更好的一致性(Bias Mean [SD]=-0.03[0.11] 与 0.14 [0.11]),与专有软件相比,该模型能够更准确地估算典型的久坐时间长度(MDAPE[IQR] = 0.11[0.06-0.26] 与 0.42[0.32-0.48]),并且具有更好的一致性(Bias Mean [SD] = 3.91[5.67] 分钟与-11.93[5.07] 分钟)。使用 ALLO-Active 数据集,STEPHEN 和 STEPCODE 并没有改善久坐时间比例的估计,但 STEPHEN 比专有软件更准确地估算典型的久坐时间长度(MDAPE[IQR] = 0.19[0.03-0.25] 与 0.36[0.15-0.48]),且偏差更小(Bias Mean[SD] = 0.70[8.89] 分钟与-11.35[9.17] 分钟)。

结论

STEPHEN 可以描述久坐时间比例和典型的久坐时间长度。该方法可以从 https://github.com/limfuxing/stephen/ 以开放访问的 R 包形式获得。该包包括训练好的模型,但用户可以灵活地训练自己的模型。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/11440759/c74fd6c60af5/12874_2024_2311_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/11440759/f5e6aea5cfc6/12874_2024_2311_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/11440759/998aad716ea5/12874_2024_2311_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/11440759/c74fd6c60af5/12874_2024_2311_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/11440759/f5e6aea5cfc6/12874_2024_2311_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/11440759/998aad716ea5/12874_2024_2311_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c87/11440759/c74fd6c60af5/12874_2024_2311_Fig3_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Detection of sedentary time and bouts using consumer-grade wrist-worn devices: a hidden semi-Markov model.使用消费级腕戴设备检测久坐时间和时段:一种隐半马尔可夫模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02311-5.
2
Estimating Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior in a Free-Living Context: A Pragmatic Comparison of Consumer-Based Activity Trackers and ActiGraph Accelerometry.在自由生活环境中评估身体活动和久坐行为:基于消费者的活动追踪器与ActiGraph加速度计的实用比较
J Med Internet Res. 2016 Sep 7;18(9):e239. doi: 10.2196/jmir.5531.
3
Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in Laboratory and Free-Living Settings for Patients With Chronic Pain: Criterion Validity Study.腕戴式活动追踪器在慢性疼痛患者的实验室和自由生活环境中的应用:效标效度研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2021 Jan 12;9(1):e24806. doi: 10.2196/24806.
4
Accuracy of Consumer Wearable Heart Rate Measurement During an Ecologically Valid 24-Hour Period: Intraindividual Validation Study.消费者可穿戴心率测量在 24 小时内的准确性:个体内验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Mar 11;7(3):e10828. doi: 10.2196/10828.
5
Comprehensive comparison of Apple Watch and Fitbit monitors in a free-living setting.在自由生活环境下,对 Apple Watch 和 Fitbit 监测器的综合比较。
PLoS One. 2021 May 26;16(5):e0251975. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0251975. eCollection 2021.
6
Heart Rate Measures From Wrist-Worn Activity Trackers in a Laboratory and Free-Living Setting: Validation Study.腕戴活动追踪器在实验室和自由生活环境中心率测量:验证研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Oct 2;7(10):e14120. doi: 10.2196/14120.
7
Validity Evaluation of the Fitbit Charge2 and the Garmin vivosmart HR+ in Free-Living Environments in an Older Adult Cohort.在老年人群体的自然生活环境中评估 Fitbit Charge2 和 Garmin vivosmart HR+ 的有效性。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2019 Jun 19;7(6):e13084. doi: 10.2196/13084.
8
Estimating physical activity and sedentary behaviour in a free-living environment: A comparative study between Fitbit Charge 2 and Actigraph GT3X.在自然生活环境中估算身体活动和久坐行为:Fitbit Charge 2 和 Actigraph GT3X 的比较研究。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 11;15(6):e0234426. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234426. eCollection 2020.
9
Evaluation of raw acceleration sedentary thresholds in children and adults.评估儿童和成人的原始加速度静坐阈值。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2017 Dec;27(12):1814-1823. doi: 10.1111/sms.12795. Epub 2016 Nov 22.
10
How well do activity monitors estimate energy expenditure? A systematic review and meta-analysis of the validity of current technologies.活动监测器在多大程度上能准确估计能量消耗?当前技术有效性的系统评价和荟萃分析。
Br J Sports Med. 2020 Mar;54(6):332-340. doi: 10.1136/bjsports-2018-099643. Epub 2018 Sep 7.

本文引用的文献

1
CHAP-Adult: A Reliable and Valid Algorithm to Classify Sitting and Measure Sitting Patterns Using Data From Hip-Worn Accelerometers in Adults Aged 35.CHAP-成人:一种可靠且有效的算法,用于使用35岁及以上成年人髋部佩戴式加速度计的数据对坐姿进行分类并测量坐姿模式
J Meas Phys Behav. 2022 Dec;5(4):215-223. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2021-0062. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
2
Step-count outcomes of 13 different activity trackers: Results from laboratory and free-living experiments.13 种不同活动追踪器的计步结果:实验室和自由生活实验结果。
Gait Posture. 2022 Oct;98:24-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2022.08.004. Epub 2022 Aug 9.
3
Preventing the adverse cardiovascular consequences of allogeneic stem cell transplantation with a multi-faceted exercise intervention: the ALLO-Active trial protocol.
采用多方面运动干预预防异基因干细胞移植的不良心血管后果:ALLO-Active 试验方案。
BMC Cancer. 2022 Aug 17;22(1):898. doi: 10.1186/s12885-022-09793-w.
4
Assessment of 24-hour physical behaviour in children and adolescents via wearables: a systematic review of free-living validation studies.通过可穿戴设备评估儿童和青少年的24小时身体行为:自由生活验证研究的系统评价
BMJ Open Sport Exerc Med. 2022 May 12;8(2):e001267. doi: 10.1136/bmjsem-2021-001267. eCollection 2022.
5
Sitting less and moving more for improved metabolic and brain health in type 2 diabetes: 'OPTIMISE your health' trial protocol.减少久坐、增加活动量以改善 2 型糖尿病患者的代谢和大脑健康:“优化健康”试验方案。
BMC Public Health. 2022 May 10;22(1):929. doi: 10.1186/s12889-022-13123-x.
6
The Dilemma of Analyzing Physical Activity and Sedentary Behavior with Wrist Accelerometer Data: Challenges and Opportunities.利用腕部加速度计数据分析身体活动和久坐行为的困境:挑战与机遇
J Clin Med. 2021 Dec 18;10(24):5951. doi: 10.3390/jcm10245951.
7
Application of Convolutional Neural Network Algorithms for Advancing Sedentary and Activity Bout Classification.卷积神经网络算法在推进久坐行为和活动时段分类中的应用。
J Meas Phys Behav. 2021 Jun;4(2):102-110. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2020-0016. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
8
Three weeks of interrupting sitting lowers fasting glucose and glycemic variability, but not glucose tolerance, in free-living women and men with obesity.三周的久坐时间打断可降低肥胖的自由生活女性和男性的空腹血糖和血糖变异性,但不能改善葡萄糖耐量。
Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2021 Aug 1;321(2):E203-E216. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00599.2020. Epub 2021 Jun 21.
9
The CNN Hip Accelerometer Posture (CHAP) Method for Classifying Sitting Patterns from Hip Accelerometers: A Validation Study.基于 CNN 加速度计的坐姿分类方法(CHAP):对髋关节加速度计坐姿模式的验证性研究。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Nov 1;53(11):2445-2454. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002705.
10
Sit less and move more for cardiovascular health: emerging insights and opportunities.为了心血管健康,请减少久坐、增加活动:新的见解与机遇。
Nat Rev Cardiol. 2021 Sep;18(9):637-648. doi: 10.1038/s41569-021-00547-y. Epub 2021 May 20.