• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

卷积神经网络算法在推进久坐行为和活动时段分类中的应用。

Application of Convolutional Neural Network Algorithms for Advancing Sedentary and Activity Bout Classification.

作者信息

Nakandala Supun, Jankowska Marta M, Tuz-Zahra Fatima, Bellettiere John, Carlson Jordan A, LaCroix Andrea Z, Hartman Sheri J, Rosenberg Dori E, Zou Jingjing, Kumar Arun, Natarajan Loki

机构信息

Department of Computer Science and Engineering, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

Qualcomm Institute/Calit2, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, CA, USA.

出版信息

J Meas Phys Behav. 2021 Jun;4(2):102-110. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2020-0016. Epub 2021 Feb 25.

DOI:10.1123/jmpb.2020-0016
PMID:34458688
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8389343/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Machine learning has been used for classification of physical behavior bouts from hip-worn accelerometers; however, this research has been limited due to the challenges of directly observing and coding human behavior "in the wild." Deep learning algorithms, such as convolutional neural networks (CNNs), may offer better representation of data than other machine learning algorithms without the need for engineered features and may be better suited to dealing with free-living data. The purpose of this study was to develop a modeling pipeline for evaluation of a CNN model on a free-living data set and compare CNN inputs and results with the commonly used machine learning random forest and logistic regression algorithms.

METHOD

Twenty-eight free-living women wore an ActiGraph GT3X+accelerometer on their right hip for 7 days. A concurrently worn thigh-mounted activPAL device captured ground truth activity labels. The authors evaluated logistic regression, random forest, and CNN models for classifying sitting, standing, and stepping bouts. The authors also assessed the benefit of performing feature engineering for this task.

RESULTS

The CNN classifier performed best (average balanced accuracy for bout classification of sitting, standing, and stepping was 84%) compared with the other methods (56% for logistic regression and 76% for random forest), even without performing any feature engineering.

CONCLUSION

Using the recent advancements in deep neural networks, the authors showed that a CNN model can outperform other methods even without feature engineering. This has important implications for both the model's ability to deal with the complexity of free-living data and its potential transferability to new populations.

摘要

背景

机器学习已被用于通过佩戴在髋部的加速度计对身体行为发作进行分类;然而,由于在“自然环境”中直接观察和编码人类行为存在挑战,这项研究受到了限制。深度学习算法,如卷积神经网络(CNN),可能比其他机器学习算法能更好地表示数据,且无需人工设计特征,可能更适合处理自由生活数据。本研究的目的是开发一个建模流程,用于在自由生活数据集上评估CNN模型,并将CNN的输入和结果与常用的机器学习随机森林和逻辑回归算法进行比较。

方法

28名自由生活的女性在右髋部佩戴ActiGraph GT3X +加速度计7天。同时佩戴在大腿上的activPAL设备记录实际的活动标签。作者评估了逻辑回归、随机森林和CNN模型对坐姿、站姿和行走发作进行分类的情况。作者还评估了针对此任务进行特征工程的益处。

结果

与其他方法(逻辑回归为56%,随机森林为76%)相比,即使不进行任何特征工程,CNN分类器的表现最佳(坐姿、站姿和行走发作分类的平均平衡准确率为84%)。

结论

利用深度神经网络的最新进展,作者表明,即使不进行特征工程,CNN模型也能优于其他方法。这对于该模型处理自由生活数据复杂性的能力及其向新人群的潜在可转移性都具有重要意义。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a6/8389343/5498a878fb10/nihms-1715953-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a6/8389343/88f873cd8419/nihms-1715953-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a6/8389343/7e567332d05c/nihms-1715953-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a6/8389343/5498a878fb10/nihms-1715953-f0003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a6/8389343/88f873cd8419/nihms-1715953-f0001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a6/8389343/7e567332d05c/nihms-1715953-f0002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c9a6/8389343/5498a878fb10/nihms-1715953-f0003.jpg

相似文献

1
Application of Convolutional Neural Network Algorithms for Advancing Sedentary and Activity Bout Classification.卷积神经网络算法在推进久坐行为和活动时段分类中的应用。
J Meas Phys Behav. 2021 Jun;4(2):102-110. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2020-0016. Epub 2021 Feb 25.
2
The CNN Hip Accelerometer Posture (CHAP) Method for Classifying Sitting Patterns from Hip Accelerometers: A Validation Study.基于 CNN 加速度计的坐姿分类方法(CHAP):对髋关节加速度计坐姿模式的验证性研究。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Nov 1;53(11):2445-2454. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002705.
3
Improving Hip-Worn Accelerometer Estimates of Sitting Using Machine Learning Methods.使用机器学习方法提高髋部佩戴加速度计对坐姿的估计。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Jul;50(7):1518-1524. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001578.
4
Hip and Wrist Accelerometer Algorithms for Free-Living Behavior Classification.用于自由生活行为分类的髋部和腕部加速度计算法
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2016 May;48(5):933-40. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000840.
5
CHAP-child: an open source method for estimating sit-to-stand transitions and sedentary bout patterns from hip accelerometers among children.CHAP-child:一种从儿童髋部加速度计中估算坐立转换和久坐时间模式的开源方法。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Aug 26;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01349-2.
6
Ability of thigh-worn ActiGraph and activPAL monitors to classify posture and motion.大腿佩戴式ActiGraph和activPAL监测仪对姿势和运动进行分类的能力。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2015 May;47(5):952-9. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000000497.
7
Detecting prolonged sitting bouts with the ActiGraph GT3X.使用 ActiGraph GT3X 检测长时间久坐。
Scand J Med Sci Sports. 2020 Mar;30(3):572-582. doi: 10.1111/sms.13601. Epub 2019 Dec 22.
8
Field evaluation of a random forest activity classifier for wrist-worn accelerometer data.用于腕部佩戴式加速度计数据的随机森林活动分类器的现场评估。
J Sci Med Sport. 2017 Jan;20(1):75-80. doi: 10.1016/j.jsams.2016.06.003. Epub 2016 Jun 23.
9
CHAP-Adult: A Reliable and Valid Algorithm to Classify Sitting and Measure Sitting Patterns Using Data From Hip-Worn Accelerometers in Adults Aged 35.CHAP-成人:一种可靠且有效的算法,用于使用35岁及以上成年人髋部佩戴式加速度计的数据对坐姿进行分类并测量坐姿模式
J Meas Phys Behav. 2022 Dec;5(4):215-223. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2021-0062. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
10
Cross-validation and out-of-sample testing of physical activity intensity predictions with a wrist-worn accelerometer.腕戴加速度计的体力活动强度预测的交叉验证和样本外测试。
J Appl Physiol (1985). 2018 May 1;124(5):1284-1293. doi: 10.1152/japplphysiol.00760.2017. Epub 2018 Jan 25.

引用本文的文献

1
Machine learning used to study risk factors for chronic diseases: A scoping review.用于研究慢性病风险因素的机器学习:一项范围综述。
Can J Public Health. 2025 Jun 11. doi: 10.17269/s41997-025-01059-9.
2
Detection of sedentary time and bouts using consumer-grade wrist-worn devices: a hidden semi-Markov model.使用消费级腕戴设备检测久坐时间和时段:一种隐半马尔可夫模型。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Sep 30;24(1):222. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02311-5.
3
CHAP-Adult: A Reliable and Valid Algorithm to Classify Sitting and Measure Sitting Patterns Using Data From Hip-Worn Accelerometers in Adults Aged 35.

本文引用的文献

1
Total Sitting Time and Sitting Pattern in Postmenopausal Women Differ by Hispanic Ethnicity and are Associated With Cardiometabolic Risk Biomarkers.绝经后女性的总坐姿时间和坐姿模式因西班牙裔种族而异,并与心血管代谢风险生物标志物相关。
J Am Heart Assoc. 2020 Feb 18;9(4):e013403. doi: 10.1161/JAHA.119.013403. Epub 2020 Feb 17.
2
A Framework to Evaluate Devices That Assess Physical Behavior.评估物理行为的设备的评估框架。
Exerc Sport Sci Rev. 2019 Oct;47(4):206-214. doi: 10.1249/JES.0000000000000206.
3
Day-level sedentary pattern estimates derived from hip-worn accelerometer cut-points in 8-12-year-olds: Do they reflect postural transitions?
CHAP-成人:一种可靠且有效的算法,用于使用35岁及以上成年人髋部佩戴式加速度计的数据对坐姿进行分类并测量坐姿模式
J Meas Phys Behav. 2022 Dec;5(4):215-223. doi: 10.1123/jmpb.2021-0062. Epub 2022 Sep 21.
4
Comparison of machine learning approaches for near-fall-detection with motion sensors.使用运动传感器进行近跌倒检测的机器学习方法比较
Front Digit Health. 2023 Jul 26;5:1223845. doi: 10.3389/fdgth.2023.1223845. eCollection 2023.
5
CHAP-child: an open source method for estimating sit-to-stand transitions and sedentary bout patterns from hip accelerometers among children.CHAP-child:一种从儿童髋部加速度计中估算坐立转换和久坐时间模式的开源方法。
Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2022 Aug 26;19(1):109. doi: 10.1186/s12966-022-01349-2.
6
Physical activity intensity profiles associated with cardiometabolic risk in middle-aged to older men and women.中年到老年男性和女性与心血管代谢风险相关的身体活动强度特征。
Prev Med. 2022 Mar;156:106977. doi: 10.1016/j.ypmed.2022.106977. Epub 2022 Feb 4.
7
Cohort profile: the Women's Health Accelerometry Collaboration.队列资料简介:妇女健康加速计协作研究。
BMJ Open. 2021 Nov 29;11(11):e052038. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-052038.
8
Analysis of Body Behavior Characteristics after Sports Training Based on Convolution Neural Network.基于卷积神经网络的体育训练后身体行为特征分析。
Comput Intell Neurosci. 2021 Jul 20;2021:7006541. doi: 10.1155/2021/7006541. eCollection 2021.
9
Age Differences in Estimating Physical Activity by Wrist Accelerometry Using Machine Learning.基于机器学习的腕部加速度计估算体力活动的年龄差异。
Sensors (Basel). 2021 May 12;21(10):3352. doi: 10.3390/s21103352.
10
The CNN Hip Accelerometer Posture (CHAP) Method for Classifying Sitting Patterns from Hip Accelerometers: A Validation Study.基于 CNN 加速度计的坐姿分类方法(CHAP):对髋关节加速度计坐姿模式的验证性研究。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2021 Nov 1;53(11):2445-2454. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000002705.
基于 8-12 岁儿童髋部佩戴加速度计切点的日间久坐模式估计值:它们是否反映姿势转换?
J Sports Sci. 2019 Aug;37(16):1899-1909. doi: 10.1080/02640414.2019.1605646. Epub 2019 Apr 19.
4
Calibration and validation of accelerometer-based activity monitors: A systematic review of machine-learning approaches.基于加速度计的活动监测器的校准与验证:机器学习方法的系统综述
Gait Posture. 2019 Feb;68:285-299. doi: 10.1016/j.gaitpost.2018.12.003. Epub 2018 Dec 5.
5
Sedentary Behavior and Prevalent Diabetes in 6,166 Older Women: The Objective Physical Activity and Cardiovascular Health Study.久坐行为与 6166 名老年女性的糖尿病患病率:客观体力活动与心血管健康研究。
J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci. 2019 Feb 15;74(3):387-395. doi: 10.1093/gerona/gly101.
6
Sedentary behaviour and risk of all-cause, cardiovascular and cancer mortality, and incident type 2 diabetes: a systematic review and dose response meta-analysis.久坐行为与全因、心血管疾病和癌症死亡率以及 2 型糖尿病发病风险的关系:系统评价和剂量反应荟萃分析。
Eur J Epidemiol. 2018 Sep;33(9):811-829. doi: 10.1007/s10654-018-0380-1. Epub 2018 Mar 28.
7
Improving Hip-Worn Accelerometer Estimates of Sitting Using Machine Learning Methods.使用机器学习方法提高髋部佩戴加速度计对坐姿的估计。
Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2018 Jul;50(7):1518-1524. doi: 10.1249/MSS.0000000000001578.
8
The cross-sectional associations between objectively measured sedentary time and cardiometabolic health markers in adults - a systematic review with meta-analysis component.横断面研究显示,成年人久坐时间与心血管代谢健康标志物的相关性-系统评价及荟萃分析
Obes Rev. 2018 Mar;19(3):381-395. doi: 10.1111/obr.12642. Epub 2017 Nov 27.
9
Sedentary Behaviors and Biomarkers Among Breast Cancer Survivors.乳腺癌幸存者的久坐行为与生物标志物
J Phys Act Health. 2018 Jan 1;15(1):1-6. doi: 10.1123/jpah.2017-0045. Epub 2017 Sep 14.
10
Accelerometer Data Collection and Processing Criteria to Assess Physical Activity and Other Outcomes: A Systematic Review and Practical Considerations.加速度计数据采集和处理标准评估体力活动和其他结果:系统评价和实际考虑。
Sports Med. 2017 Sep;47(9):1821-1845. doi: 10.1007/s40279-017-0716-0.