Department of Physical Activity and Sport, Faculty of Sport Sciences, Campus of Excellence Mare Nostrum, University of Murcia, Murcia, Spain.
Centre for Human Movement and Rehabilitation, School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, United Kingdom.
Ann Med. 2024 Dec;56(1):2408457. doi: 10.1080/07853890.2024.2408457. Epub 2024 Oct 1.
The primary purposes were (a) to estimate the pooled effects of injury prevention programs (IPPs) on reducing overall and some specific body regions (lower extremity, thigh, knee, and ankle) injury incidence rates (IIRs) and (b) to compare the effects of single- and multi-component IPPs on mitigating injury risk in youth team sport athletes. A secondary objective was to explore the individual effects of different components on these IIRs.
Searches were performed up to 15 January 2024 in PubMed, Web of Science, SPORTDiscus, and Cochrane Library. Eligible criteria were: exercise-based interventions evaluated against a control group, overall IIRs were reported, and youth (≤19 years old) team sport players. Two reviewers extracted data and assessed trial quality using the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) statement, the Physiotherapy Evidence Database Scale (PEDro), and a risk of bias tool (Cochrane Back and Neck Group). Pooled effects were calculated by Frequentist random effects pairwise and network meta-analyses.
Twenty-one studies were included. IPPs reduced overall, lower extremities, thigh, knee, and ankle IIRs by an average of approximately 35%. Most of the IPPs demonstrated statistically significant risk mitigation effects for overall and lower extremity injuries compared to control group. Interventions comprised exclusively of strength ([IRR = 0.3 [95%CI = 0.10-0.93]) and flexibility (IRR = 0.49 [95%CI = 0.36-0.68]), as well as those including stability exercises, were the most effective measures for reducing injuries in youth team sports.
The implementation of current IPPs in training sessions for several weeks has shown to be an effective strategy for reducing the risk of injury in youth team sport athletes by one-third. Indirect evidence suggests that strength, flexibility, and stability might be exercise components with the highest risk mitigation effects; however, more research is crucial to confirm our estimates with direct evidence.
主要目的是(a) 估计伤害预防计划(IPP)对降低整体和一些特定身体部位(下肢、大腿、膝盖和脚踝)伤害发生率(IIR)的综合效果,以及(b) 比较单一和多成分 IPP 对减轻青年团队运动运动员受伤风险的效果。次要目的是探讨不同成分对这些 IIR 的个别影响。
截至 2024 年 1 月 15 日,在 PubMed、Web of Science、SPORTDiscus 和 Cochrane Library 中进行了检索。纳入标准为:与对照组相比,评估基于运动的干预措施,报告总体 IIR,以及青年(≤19 岁)团队运动运动员。两名审查员使用 CONSORT 声明、物理治疗证据数据库量表(PEDro)和偏倚风险工具(Cochrane 背部和颈部小组)提取数据并评估试验质量。通过 Frequentist 随机效应成对和网络荟萃分析计算汇总效果。
共纳入 21 项研究。IPP 使整体、下肢、大腿、膝盖和脚踝 IIR 平均降低约 35%。与对照组相比,大多数 IPP 对整体和下肢损伤显示出统计学上显著的风险缓解效果。干预措施仅包含力量(IRR = 0.3 [95%CI = 0.10-0.93])和灵活性(IRR = 0.49 [95%CI = 0.36-0.68]),以及包含稳定性练习的干预措施,是减少青年团队运动中受伤的最有效措施。
在数周的训练中实施当前的 IPP 已被证明是降低青年团队运动运动员受伤风险三分之一的有效策略。间接证据表明,力量、灵活性和稳定性可能是具有最高风险缓解效果的运动成分;然而,为了用直接证据证实我们的估计,还需要进行更多的研究。