文献检索文档翻译深度研究
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
邀请有礼套餐&价格历史记录

新学期,新优惠

限时优惠:9月1日-9月22日

30天高级会员仅需29元

1天体验卡首发特惠仅需5.99元

了解详情
不再提醒
插件&应用
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
高级版
套餐订阅购买积分包
AI 工具
文献检索文档翻译深度研究
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2025

当患者能够访问护理记录内容时应对护理记录复杂性的质性研究

Navigating the Complexities of Nursing Documentation When Patients Have Access to the Content: A Qualitative Study.

作者信息

Lerbæk Birgitte, Kusk Kathrine Hoffmann, Jørgensen Lone, Laugesen Britt

机构信息

Unit for Psychiatric Research, Psychiatry-Aalborg University Hospital, Aalborg, Denmark.

Research Unit Thisted, Aalborg University Hospital, Thisted, Denmark.

出版信息

J Adv Nurs. 2025 May;81(5):2604-2616. doi: 10.1111/jan.16502. Epub 2024 Oct 1.


DOI:10.1111/jan.16502
PMID:39352005
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11967306/
Abstract

AIM: To explore how Danish registered nurses (RNs) in hospitals experience documenting nursing care in electronic patient records when the content is accessible to patients. METHODS: In a qualitative research design, data were generated in six focus groups conducted in late 2022 and early 2023, comprising 31 RNs employed in inpatient wards at a university hospital in Denmark. Subsequently, qualitative content analysis was applied to the gathered data. RESULTS: The findings include three themes: (1) weighing one's words, (2) building trust or triggering conflicts and (3) risking loss of knowledge. Together, these three themes illustrate the complexities that RNs navigate when patients have access to the content of nursing documentation. CONCLUSION: Patients' access to nursing documentation requires RNs to navigate a complex interplay of factors, including awareness of language-use, influence on the nurse-patient-relative relationships, and the risk of losing essential knowledge. Therefore, although patients' access to nursing documentation can induce a positive change in terms of strengthening the professional focus on documentation, it can also result in changes in documentation practices in ways that may compromise nursing documentation as a working tool. IMPLICATIONS FOR THE PROFESSION AND PATIENT CARE: The findings emphasize an urgent need to explore and discuss how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way when patients have access to the documentation. Furthermore, to prevent misunderstandings and conflicts with patients, it is essential to focus on and prioritize patient involvement in nursing documentation. IMPACT: RNs navigate complex practices when patients have direct online access to nursing documentation content. It is crucial to clarify which content nursing documentation should entail and how sensitive nursing observations can be shared in a safe and appropriate way. REPORTING: The COREQ checklist was used for reporting.

摘要

目的:探讨丹麦医院注册护士在患者可查阅电子病历中护理记录内容时,对记录护理过程的体验。 方法:采用定性研究设计,于2022年末和2023年初进行了6个焦点小组访谈,参与者为丹麦一家大学医院住院病房的31名注册护士。随后,对收集到的数据进行定性内容分析。 结果:研究结果包括三个主题:(1)措辞谨慎;(2)建立信任或引发冲突;(3)面临知识流失风险。这三个主题共同说明了护士在患者可查阅护理记录内容时所面临的复杂情况。 结论:患者可查阅护理记录要求护士应对诸多复杂因素的相互作用,包括对语言使用的意识、对护患关系及亲属关系的影响,以及知识流失的风险。因此,尽管患者可查阅护理记录能促使专业人员更注重记录,但也可能导致记录方式发生变化,从而影响护理记录作为工作工具的效用。 对专业和患者护理的启示:研究结果强调迫切需要探讨和讨论在患者可查阅记录的情况下,如何以安全、恰当的方式分享敏感的护理观察结果。此外,为防止与患者产生误解和冲突,必须重视并优先考虑患者参与护理记录。 影响:当患者可直接在线查阅护理记录内容时,护士面临复杂的情况。明确护理记录应包含的内容以及如何以安全、恰当的方式分享敏感的护理观察结果至关重要。 报告:采用COREQ清单进行报告。

相似文献

[1]
Navigating the Complexities of Nursing Documentation When Patients Have Access to the Content: A Qualitative Study.

J Adv Nurs. 2025-5

[2]
Medical and surgical nurses' experiences of modifying and implementing contextually suitable Safewards interventions into medical and surgical hospital wards.

J Adv Nurs. 2024-11

[3]
Recording the content of the caring process.

J Nurs Manag. 2005-5

[4]
Nurses' experiences of caring for nursing care-dependent ICU patients: A qualitative study.

Nurs Crit Care. 2024-9

[5]
Nurses' perceptions of an electronic patient record from a patient safety perspective: a qualitative study.

J Adv Nurs. 2011-7-22

[6]
Nurse Attitudes Related to Accepting Electronic Health Records and Bedside Documentation.

Comput Inform Nurs. 2018-11

[7]
Intensive care unit nurses' experiences of nursing concerns, activities, and documentation on patient deterioration: A focus-group study.

Aust Crit Care. 2025-3

[8]
Nursing documentation in inpatient psychiatry: The relevance of nurse-patient interactions in progress notes-A focus group study with mental health staff.

J Clin Nurs. 2017-12-4

[9]
Evaluating Nurses' Perceptions of Documentation in the Electronic Health Record: Multimethod Analysis.

JMIR Nurs. 2025-4-28

[10]
Evaluation of registered nurses' knowledge and practice of documentation at a Jamaican hospital.

Int Nurs Rev. 2013-6-7

本文引用的文献

[1]
Patient empowerment through online access to health records.

BMJ. 2022-9-29

[2]
Ethical dilemmas in nursing documentation.

Nurs Ethics. 2022-3

[3]
A systematic review of patient access to medical records in the acute setting: practicalities, perspectives and ethical consequences.

BMC Med Ethics. 2020-3-2

[4]
Patient Use and Experience With Online Access to Electronic Health Records in Norway: Results From an Online Survey.

J Med Internet Res. 2020-2-7

[5]
Informed consent procedure in a double blind randomized anthelminthic trial on Pemba Island, Tanzania: do pamphlet and information session increase caregivers knowledge?

BMC Med Ethics. 2020-1-6

[6]
Health Professionals' Experience with Patients Accessing Their Electronic Health Records: Results from an Online Survey.

Stud Health Technol Inform. 2019-8-21

[7]
Methodological challenges in qualitative content analysis: A discussion paper.

Nurse Educ Today. 2017-9

[8]
Multiple triangulation and collaborative research using qualitative methods to explore decision making in pre-hospital emergency care.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017-1-24

[9]
Clinical prediction in defined populations: a simulation study investigating when and how to aggregate existing models.

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017-1-6

[10]
Electronic Health Records: Then, Now, and in the Future.

Yearb Med Inform. 2016-5-20

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

推荐工具

医学文档翻译智能文献检索