• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

意大利立法选举中公众关注度的波动和极端事件。

Fluctuations and extreme events in the public attention on Italian legislative elections.

机构信息

Department of Molecular Sciences and Nanosystems, Ca' Foscari University of Venice, 30172, Venice, Italy.

LUISS Data Lab, Viale Pola 12, 00198, Rome, Italy.

出版信息

Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 1;14(1):22804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69354-y.

DOI:10.1038/s41598-024-69354-y
PMID:39353995
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11445506/
Abstract

The share of social media attention to political candidates was shown to be a good predictor of election outcomes in several studies. This attention to individual candidates fluctuates due to incoming daily news and sometimes reflects long-term trends. By analyzing Twitter data in the 2013 and 2022 election campaign we observe that, on short timescales, the dynamics can be effectively characterized by a mean-reverting diffusion process on a logarithmic scale. This implies that the response to news and the exchange of opinions on Twitter lead to attention fluctuations spanning orders of magnitudes. However, these fluctuations remain centered around certain average levels of popularity, which change slowly in contrast to the rapid daily and hourly variations driven by Twitter trends and news. In particular, on our 2013 data we are able to estimate the dominant timescale of fluctuations at around three hours. Finally, by considering the extreme data points in the tail of the attention variation distribution, we could identify critical events in the electoral campaign period and extract useful information from the flow of data.

摘要

社交媒体对政治候选人的关注度在几项研究中被证明是选举结果的良好预测指标。由于每天都会有新的新闻,因此对个别候选人的关注度会波动,有时还会反映出长期趋势。通过分析 2013 年和 2022 年选举活动中的 Twitter 数据,我们观察到,在短时间尺度上,动态可以通过对数尺度上的均值回复扩散过程有效地描述。这意味着对新闻的反应和在 Twitter 上交换意见会导致关注度波动跨越多个数量级。然而,这些波动仍然集中在某些受欢迎程度的平均水平周围,与由 Twitter 趋势和新闻驱动的快速日常和小时变化相比,这些平均水平变化缓慢。特别是在我们的 2013 年数据中,我们能够估计波动的主导时间尺度约为三个小时。最后,通过考虑关注度变化分布尾部的极端数据点,我们可以识别选举期间的关键事件,并从数据流中提取有用信息。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/9263e90d77a6/41598_2024_69354_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/a10e7405e468/41598_2024_69354_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/ba29b55a9aea/41598_2024_69354_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/27a5736f62c1/41598_2024_69354_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/9263e90d77a6/41598_2024_69354_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/a10e7405e468/41598_2024_69354_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/ba29b55a9aea/41598_2024_69354_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/27a5736f62c1/41598_2024_69354_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ba9c/11445506/9263e90d77a6/41598_2024_69354_Fig4_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Fluctuations and extreme events in the public attention on Italian legislative elections.意大利立法选举中公众关注度的波动和极端事件。
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 1;14(1):22804. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-69354-y.
2
Evolution of Public Opinion on COVID-19 Vaccination in Japan: Large-Scale Twitter Data Analysis.日本民众对 COVID-19 疫苗接种态度的演变:基于大规模 Twitter 数据的分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2022 Dec 22;24(12):e41928. doi: 10.2196/41928.
3
Evidence of disorientation towards immunization on online social media after contrasting political communication on vaccines. Results from an analysis of Twitter data in Italy.疫苗相关政治言论对比后,社交媒体上对免疫接种方向的混乱证据。意大利推特数据分析结果。
PLoS One. 2021 Jul 9;16(7):e0253569. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0253569. eCollection 2021.
4
Twitter-Based Analysis of the Dynamics of Collective Attention to Political Parties.基于推特的政党集体关注度动态分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0131184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131184. eCollection 2015.
5
A comparative framework to analyze convergence on Twitter electoral conversations.分析 Twitter 选举对话趋同的比较框架。
Sci Rep. 2022 Nov 9;12(1):19062. doi: 10.1038/s41598-022-21861-6.
6
Reconstruction of the socio-semantic dynamics of political activist Twitter networks-Method and application to the 2017 French presidential election.重建政治活动家推特网络的社会语义动态——以 2017 年法国总统选举为例的方法与应用。
PLoS One. 2018 Sep 19;13(9):e0201879. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0201879. eCollection 2018.
7
Investigating Italian disinformation spreading on Twitter in the context of 2019 European elections.调查 2019 年欧洲选举背景下意大利在推特上传播的虚假信息。
PLoS One. 2020 Jan 17;15(1):e0227821. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0227821. eCollection 2020.
8
Social media popularity and election results: A study of the 2016 Taiwanese general election.社交媒体人气与选举结果:对 2016 年台湾地区领导人选举的研究。
PLoS One. 2018 Nov 28;13(11):e0208190. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0208190. eCollection 2018.
9
Political polarization of news media and influencers on Twitter in the 2016 and 2020 US presidential elections.2016 年和 2020 年美国总统选举中推特上新闻媒体和影响者的政治极化。
Nat Hum Behav. 2023 Jun;7(6):904-916. doi: 10.1038/s41562-023-01550-8. Epub 2023 Mar 13.
10
The limited reach of fake news on Twitter during 2019 European elections.2019 年欧洲选举期间推特上虚假新闻的传播范围有限。
PLoS One. 2020 Jun 18;15(6):e0234689. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0234689. eCollection 2020.

本文引用的文献

1
Multi-scale analysis of the community structure of the Twitter discourse around the Italian general elections of September 2022.对2022年9月意大利大选期间推特言论社区结构的多尺度分析。
Sci Rep. 2024 Jul 10;14(1):15980. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-65564-6.
2
Emergence of knowledge communities and information centralization during the COVID-19 pandemic.新冠疫情期间知识社区的兴起和信息集中化。
Soc Sci Med. 2021 Sep;285:114215. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114215. Epub 2021 Jul 31.
3
A model for the Twitter sentiment curve.Twitter 情感曲线模型。
PLoS One. 2021 Apr 15;16(4):e0249634. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0249634. eCollection 2021.
4
Unraveling the Origin of Social Bursts in Collective Attention.揭示集体关注中社会爆发的起源
Sci Rep. 2020 Mar 13;10(1):4629. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-61523-z.
5
Influence of fake news in Twitter during the 2016 US presidential election.推特上 2016 年美国总统大选期间假新闻的影响。
Nat Commun. 2019 Jan 2;10(1):7. doi: 10.1038/s41467-018-07761-2.
6
The science of fake news.假新闻的科学。
Science. 2018 Mar 9;359(6380):1094-1096. doi: 10.1126/science.aao2998. Epub 2018 Mar 8.
7
The spreading of misinformation online.网上错误信息的传播。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Jan 19;113(3):554-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1517441113. Epub 2016 Jan 4.
8
Twitter-Based Analysis of the Dynamics of Collective Attention to Political Parties.基于推特的政党集体关注度动态分析
PLoS One. 2015 Jul 10;10(7):e0131184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0131184. eCollection 2015.
9
Political science. Exposure to ideologically diverse news and opinion on Facebook.政治学。在 Facebook 上接触意识形态多样的新闻和观点。
Science. 2015 Jun 5;348(6239):1130-2. doi: 10.1126/science.aaa1160. Epub 2015 May 7.
10
A multi-level geographical study of Italian political elections from Twitter data.基于推特数据的意大利政治选举多层次地理研究。
PLoS One. 2014 May 6;9(5):e95809. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0095809. eCollection 2014.