• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

作为关于预测误差的间歇性决策的持续感觉运动控制:计算框架及其在地面车辆转向中的应用

Sustained sensorimotor control as intermittent decisions about prediction errors: computational framework and application to ground vehicle steering.

作者信息

Markkula Gustav, Boer Erwin, Romano Richard, Merat Natasha

机构信息

Institute for Transport Studies, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.

出版信息

Biol Cybern. 2018 Jun;112(3):181-207. doi: 10.1007/s00422-017-0743-9. Epub 2018 Feb 16.

DOI:10.1007/s00422-017-0743-9
PMID:29453689
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC6002515/
Abstract

A conceptual and computational framework is proposed for modelling of human sensorimotor control and is exemplified for the sensorimotor task of steering a car. The framework emphasises control intermittency and extends on existing models by suggesting that the nervous system implements intermittent control using a combination of (1) motor primitives, (2) prediction of sensory outcomes of motor actions, and (3) evidence accumulation of prediction errors. It is shown that approximate but useful sensory predictions in the intermittent control context can be constructed without detailed forward models, as a superposition of simple prediction primitives, resembling neurobiologically observed corollary discharges. The proposed mathematical framework allows straightforward extension to intermittent behaviour from existing one-dimensional continuous models in the linear control and ecological psychology traditions. Empirical data from a driving simulator are used in model-fitting analyses to test some of the framework's main theoretical predictions: it is shown that human steering control, in routine lane-keeping and in a demanding near-limit task, is better described as a sequence of discrete stepwise control adjustments, than as continuous control. Results on the possible roles of sensory prediction in control adjustment amplitudes, and of evidence accumulation mechanisms in control onset timing, show trends that match the theoretical predictions; these warrant further investigation. The results for the accumulation-based model align with other recent literature, in a possibly converging case against the type of threshold mechanisms that are often assumed in existing models of intermittent control.

摘要

本文提出了一个用于模拟人类感觉运动控制的概念性和计算性框架,并以驾驶汽车的感觉运动任务为例进行说明。该框架强调控制的间歇性,并在现有模型的基础上进行了扩展,提出神经系统通过以下组合实现间歇性控制:(1)运动原语,(2)对运动动作的感觉结果进行预测,以及(3)对预测误差进行证据积累。研究表明,在间歇性控制的背景下,无需详细的前向模型,就可以构建近似但有用的感觉预测,作为简单预测原语的叠加,类似于神经生物学中观察到的伴随放电。所提出的数学框架允许从线性控制和生态心理学传统中的现有一维连续模型直接扩展到间歇性行为。驾驶模拟器的实证数据用于模型拟合分析,以检验该框架的一些主要理论预测:结果表明,在常规车道保持和要求苛刻的接近极限任务中,人类转向控制更适合描述为一系列离散的逐步控制调整,而不是连续控制。关于感觉预测在控制调整幅度中的可能作用以及证据积累机制在控制开始时间中的作用的结果,显示出与理论预测相符的趋势;这些值得进一步研究。基于积累的模型的结果与其他近期文献一致,这可能是一个反对现有间歇性控制模型中经常假设的阈值机制类型的趋同案例。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/1dd53757a2ec/422_2017_743_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/e83faae8ef1a/422_2017_743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/9d4de47f189f/422_2017_743_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/9a620f19c9b4/422_2017_743_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/c445d807254e/422_2017_743_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/cd96a6e964f9/422_2017_743_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/c4e9866a5164/422_2017_743_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/c6e3bd4d936f/422_2017_743_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/f8b82f20a68a/422_2017_743_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/4547ef3f8671/422_2017_743_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/a3b83a24f095/422_2017_743_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/f21d4eb9aa94/422_2017_743_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/449ea8afa6dc/422_2017_743_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/c6db141f5b57/422_2017_743_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/1dd53757a2ec/422_2017_743_Fig14_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/e83faae8ef1a/422_2017_743_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/9d4de47f189f/422_2017_743_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/9a620f19c9b4/422_2017_743_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/c445d807254e/422_2017_743_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/cd96a6e964f9/422_2017_743_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/c4e9866a5164/422_2017_743_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/c6e3bd4d936f/422_2017_743_Fig7_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/f8b82f20a68a/422_2017_743_Fig8_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/4547ef3f8671/422_2017_743_Fig9_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/a3b83a24f095/422_2017_743_Fig10_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/f21d4eb9aa94/422_2017_743_Fig11_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/449ea8afa6dc/422_2017_743_Fig12_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/c6db141f5b57/422_2017_743_Fig13_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2d6f/6002515/1dd53757a2ec/422_2017_743_Fig14_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Sustained sensorimotor control as intermittent decisions about prediction errors: computational framework and application to ground vehicle steering.作为关于预测误差的间歇性决策的持续感觉运动控制:计算框架及其在地面车辆转向中的应用
Biol Cybern. 2018 Jun;112(3):181-207. doi: 10.1007/s00422-017-0743-9. Epub 2018 Feb 16.
2
Visual control of steering in curve driving.弯道驾驶中转向的视觉控制。
J Vis. 2019 May 1;19(5):1. doi: 10.1167/19.5.1.
3
Adaptive intermittent control: A computational model explaining motor intermittency observed in human behavior.自适应间歇控制:解释人类行为中观察到的运动间歇性的计算模型。
Neural Netw. 2015 Jul;67:92-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
4
Robust anticipation of continuous steering actions from electroencephalographic data during simulated driving.在模拟驾驶过程中,从脑电图数据中稳健地预测连续转向动作。
Sci Rep. 2021 Dec 3;11(1):23383. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-02750-w.
5
Filtering Compensation for Delays and Prediction Errors during Sensorimotor Control.感觉运动控制过程中延迟和预测误差的滤波补偿
Neural Comput. 2019 Apr;31(4):738-764. doi: 10.1162/neco_a_01170. Epub 2019 Feb 14.
6
Visuomotor control, eye movements, and steering: A unified approach for incorporating feedback, feedforward, and internal models.视动控制、眼球运动和转向:反馈、前馈和内模综合的统一方法。
Psychol Bull. 2018 Oct;144(10):981-1001. doi: 10.1037/bul0000150. Epub 2018 Jun 11.
7
The Errors of Our Ways: Understanding Error Representations in Cerebellar-Dependent Motor Learning.我们方式中的错误:理解小脑依赖型运动学习中的错误表征
Cerebellum. 2016 Apr;15(2):93-103. doi: 10.1007/s12311-015-0685-5.
8
An unexpected role for visual feedback in vehicle steering control.视觉反馈在车辆转向控制中的意外作用。
Curr Biol. 2002 Feb 19;12(4):295-9. doi: 10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00685-1.
9
Visuo-manual tracking: does intermittent control with aperiodic sampling explain linear power and non-linear remnant without sensorimotor noise?视动跟踪:周期性采样的间歇控制是否可以解释无感觉运动噪声情况下的线性幂律和非线性残余?
J Physiol. 2017 Nov 1;595(21):6751-6770. doi: 10.1113/JP274288. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
10
Fuzzylot: a novel self-organising fuzzy-neural rule-based pilot system for automated vehicles.模糊地段:一种用于自动驾驶车辆的新型基于自组织模糊神经规则的试点系统。
Neural Netw. 2001 Oct;14(8):1099-112. doi: 10.1016/s0893-6080(01)00048-x.

引用本文的文献

1
Intermittent control and retinal optic flow when maintaining a curvilinear path.在维持曲线轨迹时的间歇性控制和视网膜光流
Sci Rep. 2025 May 29;15(1):18926. doi: 10.1038/s41598-025-02402-3.
2
A model of dyadic merging interactions explains human drivers' behavior from control inputs to decisions.二元合并交互模型解释了人类驾驶员从控制输入到决策的行为。
PNAS Nexus. 2024 Sep 24;3(10):pgae420. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgae420. eCollection 2024 Oct.
3
Brownian processes in human motor control support descending neural velocity commands.

本文引用的文献

1
Visuo-manual tracking: does intermittent control with aperiodic sampling explain linear power and non-linear remnant without sensorimotor noise?视动跟踪:周期性采样的间歇控制是否可以解释无感觉运动噪声情况下的线性幂律和非线性残余?
J Physiol. 2017 Nov 1;595(21):6751-6770. doi: 10.1113/JP274288. Epub 2017 Oct 1.
2
Leading to distraction: Driver distraction, lead car, and road environment.导致分心:驾驶员分心、前车和道路环境。
Accid Anal Prev. 2016 Apr;89:22-30. doi: 10.1016/j.aap.2015.12.027. Epub 2016 Jan 16.
3
Double-well dynamics of noise-driven control activation in human intermittent control: the case of stick balancing.
人类运动控制中的布朗运动支持下行神经速度指令。
Sci Rep. 2024 Apr 9;14(1):8341. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-58380-5.
4
Dynamic primitives in constrained action: systematic changes in the zero-force trajectory.约束动作中的动态基元:零力轨迹的系统变化。
J Neurophysiol. 2024 Jan 1;131(1):1-15. doi: 10.1152/jn.00082.2023. Epub 2023 Oct 11.
5
Explaining human interactions on the road by large-scale integration of computational psychological theory.通过大规模整合计算心理学理论来解释道路上的人际互动。
PNAS Nexus. 2023 Jun 20;2(6):pgad163. doi: 10.1093/pnasnexus/pgad163. eCollection 2023 Jun.
6
Should I Stay or Should I Go? Cognitive Modeling of Left-Turn Gap Acceptance Decisions in Human Drivers.我该留下还是离开?人类驾驶员左转间隙接受决策的认知建模。
Hum Factors. 2024 May;66(5):1399-1413. doi: 10.1177/00187208221144561. Epub 2022 Dec 19.
7
Accumulation of continuously time-varying sensory evidence constrains neural and behavioral responses in human collision threat detection.连续时变感觉证据的积累约束了人类碰撞威胁检测中的神经和行为反应。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jul 15;17(7):e1009096. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1009096. eCollection 2021 Jul.
8
Effects of an Active Visuomotor Steering Task on Covert Attention.一项主动视觉运动转向任务对隐蔽注意的影响。
J Eye Mov Res. 2019 Aug 8;12(3). doi: 10.16910/jemr.12.3.1.
9
Drivers use active gaze to monitor waypoints during automated driving.驾驶员在自动驾驶过程中使用主动注视来监控航点。
Sci Rep. 2021 Jan 8;11(1):263. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-80126-2.
10
Predicting takeover response to silent automated vehicle failures.预测接管对无声自动驾驶车辆故障的反应。
PLoS One. 2020 Nov 30;15(11):e0242825. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0242825. eCollection 2020.
人类间歇性控制中噪声驱动控制激活的双阱动力学:以木棍平衡为例。
Cogn Process. 2015 Nov;16(4):351-8. doi: 10.1007/s10339-015-0653-5. Epub 2015 May 1.
4
Motor primitives--new data and future questions.运动原基——新数据与未来问题
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015 Aug;33:156-65. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2015.04.004. Epub 2015 Apr 22.
5
Adaptive intermittent control: A computational model explaining motor intermittency observed in human behavior.自适应间歇控制:解释人类行为中观察到的运动间歇性的计算模型。
Neural Netw. 2015 Jul;67:92-109. doi: 10.1016/j.neunet.2015.03.012. Epub 2015 Mar 30.
6
Skilled forelimb movements and internal copy motor circuits.熟练的前肢运动与内部复制运动回路。
Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2015 Aug;33:16-24. doi: 10.1016/j.conb.2014.12.009. Epub 2015 Jan 10.
7
Active inference, eye movements and oculomotor delays.主动推理、眼动与动眼延迟。
Biol Cybern. 2014 Dec;108(6):777-801. doi: 10.1007/s00422-014-0620-8. Epub 2014 Aug 16.
8
To react or not to react? Intrinsic stochasticity of human control in virtual stick balancing.反应还是不反应?虚拟杆平衡中人类控制的内在随机性。
J R Soc Interface. 2014 Oct 6;11(99). doi: 10.1098/rsif.2014.0636.
9
Coordinated within-trial dynamics of low-frequency neural rhythms controls evidence accumulation.低频神经节律的试验内协同动力学控制证据积累。
J Neurosci. 2014 Jun 18;34(25):8519-28. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3801-13.2014.
10
Getting ahead: forward models and their place in cognitive architecture.取得领先地位:前向模型及其在认知架构中的位置。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2014 Sep;18(9):451-6. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2014.05.006. Epub 2014 Jun 6.