What is the best strategy for iron deficiency anemia prevention and control in Iran? a policy analysis study protocol.

BACKGROUND

The present study is a type of exploratory qualitative studies and applied research. The approach of this study is a prospective policy analysis in which we will formulate appropriate policy options to prevent and control iron deficiency anemia in Iran.

METHODS AND MATERIALS

Current study is a multi-method research with an analysis for policy approach containing three phases. First, through a literature review study, policies, programs and interventions of different countries to control and prevent anemia caused by iron deficiency will be identified. Then, in the qualitative phase of the study, the challenges, barriers, facilitators of the policies and programs implemented and ongoing in Iran will be examined. The content and policy-making process, as well as the context and role of stakeholders and actors will be analyzed using the framework of the policy triangle and analysis of the policy process using the Kingdon's multiple streams model. Then, the proposed initial policy options will be developed. In the next phase, an expert panel contain experts, authorities and policymakers will be formed and the proposed options will be reviewed and categorized. In order to prioritize policy options and evaluate their feasibility in Iran, the Delphi technique and the policy options analysis framework of the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) will be used. At the end, policy options will be selected based on the highest score and will be presented as appropriate policy options.

CONCLUSION

Prospective policy analysis allows the selection of potentially practical and effective policy options to control iron deficiency anemia. The findings of current study will be presented as reports and research articles for policy makers.