Gahlot Amanda, Richardson Grace, Librea Patricia, Kim Grace J
Department of Occupational Therapy, NYU Steinhardt School of Culture, Education, and Human Development, New York, NY, United States.
Department of Rehabilitation Medicine, NYU Langone Health, New York, NY, United States.
Front Rehabil Sci. 2024 Sep 19;5:1414878. doi: 10.3389/fresc.2024.1414878. eCollection 2024.
To explore the attitudes and experiences of clinicians and individuals with chronic stroke on the use of shared decision-making (SDM) during upper extremity rehabilitation to improve daily arm use in the home environment. Specifically, we aimed to describe clinician and client perspectives regarding the facilitators and barriers to using SDM within the context of a self-directed upper extremity intervention for individuals living in the community with chronic stroke.
Data were collected within the context of an interventional study examining the feasibility of the Use My Arm-Remote intervention. Focus group interviews were conducted with the clinicians ( = 3) providing the intervention and individual semi-structured interviews with the participants ( = 15) of the study. All interview data were collected after the end of the intervention period. Data were analyzed using thematic analysis.
The following themes were identified: (1) Equal partnership; (2) Enhancing clinician confidence; and (3) This is different. Facilitators and barriers were identified within each theme. Key facilitators for clinicians were competence with SDM and patient characteristics; while facilitators for patients were open and trusting relationships with clinicians and personalized experience. Key barriers to SDM for clinicians were lack of expertise in SDM and participant buy in; while patients identified a lack of foundational knowledge of stroke rehabilitation as a potential barrier.
Key barriers were analyzed using the consolidated framework for advancing implementation science to interpret results and identify strategies for enhancing the implementation of SDM in a virtual setting. The CFIR-ERIC tool highlighted the need for targeted educational meetings and materials to address the training and educational needs of both clinicians and patients for future iterations of this intervention.
探讨临床医生和慢性中风患者对于在家庭环境中进行上肢康复时使用共同决策(SDM)以改善日常手臂使用情况的态度和体验。具体而言,我们旨在描述临床医生和患者对于在针对社区慢性中风患者的上肢自主干预背景下使用SDM的促进因素和障碍的看法。
在一项研究“使用我的手臂 - 远程”干预可行性的介入性研究中收集数据。对提供干预的临床医生(n = 3)进行焦点小组访谈,并对该研究的参与者(n = 15)进行个人半结构化访谈。所有访谈数据均在干预期结束后收集。使用主题分析法对数据进行分析。
确定了以下主题:(1)平等伙伴关系;(2)增强临床医生信心;(3)这与众不同。在每个主题中都确定了促进因素和障碍。临床医生的关键促进因素是对SDM的能力和患者特征;而患者的促进因素是与临床医生开放且信任的关系以及个性化体验。临床医生进行SDM的关键障碍是缺乏SDM专业知识和参与者的接受度;而患者认为缺乏中风康复的基础知识是一个潜在障碍。
使用推进实施科学的综合框架分析关键障碍,以解释结果并确定在虚拟环境中加强SDM实施的策略。CFIR - ERIC工具强调需要有针对性的教育会议和材料,以满足临床医生和患者在该干预未来迭代中的培训和教育需求。