• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

日常生活中感知的本地环境与城市绿地和蓝色空间的使用:揭示不同年龄群体获得生态系统服务的关键因素。

Local environment perceived in daily life and urban green and blue space visits: Uncovering key factors for different age groups to access ecosystem services.

机构信息

Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Tsurukabuto 3-11, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.

Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Uehara 207, Nishihara-cho, Nakagami-gun, Okinawa, 903-0215, Japan; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.

出版信息

J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122676. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122676. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122676
PMID:39366219
Abstract

Inequality in access to green and blue spaces is a major issue in the field of environmental justice. Various factors significantly influence visitations to these spaces, including residential, commuting, and shopping areas. However, studies have mainly focused on residential environments. Analyzing the coupling of environmental and socioeconomic factors, including age, income, and childhood experience, and examining the direct and indirect effects of these factors for different age groups are needed to better understand the detailed context of inequalities in access to ecosystem services. We conducted a questionnaire survey and analysis to address these needs in an urban setting. The results demonstrate that several land use categories (i.e., agricultural lands in residential areas, grasslands near shopping areas, and deciduous forests near commuting destinations) positively correlated with visitation frequency, suggesting the lack thereof may be the cause of access inequalities. In particular, the perimeter per unit area of some land cover types, which shows the complexity of the form of each land cover category, was found to be a significant factor. We identified inequality in nature experience to be the key factor correlated with inequality in nature visits among the young age group. For the middle-aged and old age groups, nature-relatedness was positively correlated with visitation frequency. Proper design of the local environment, such as through land use planning, can be an effective measure for all age groups. For instance, long-bordered green areas in the Monsoon Asian region are an attractive traditional landscape, with high accessibility and a comfortable thermal environment. The key factors for each age group should be considered in spatial design and inclusive information-sharing to reduce inequality in access to ecosystem services.

摘要

在环境正义领域,绿色和蓝色空间获取方面的不平等是一个主要问题。各种因素极大地影响了这些空间的访问,包括居住、通勤和购物区。然而,研究主要集中在居住环境上。分析环境和社会经济因素的耦合,包括年龄、收入和童年经历,并研究这些因素对不同年龄组的直接和间接影响,对于更好地了解生态系统服务获取方面的不平等的详细情况是必要的。我们在城市环境中进行了问卷调查和分析,以解决这些需求。结果表明,几种土地利用类型(即居住区内的农业用地、购物区附近的草地和通勤目的地附近的落叶林)与访问频率呈正相关,这表明缺乏这些土地利用类型可能是造成获取不平等的原因。特别是,一些土地覆盖类型的单位面积周长,它显示了每个土地覆盖类型形式的复杂性,被发现是一个重要因素。我们发现,对于年轻群体来说,自然体验的不平等是与自然访问不平等相关的关键因素。对于中年和老年群体,与自然相关的因素与访问频率呈正相关。适当的当地环境设计,如土地利用规划,可以是所有年龄组的有效措施。例如,在季风亚洲地区,长边界的绿色区域是一种有吸引力的传统景观,具有较高的可达性和舒适的热环境。在空间设计和包容性信息共享中,应考虑每个年龄组的关键因素,以减少生态系统服务获取方面的不平等。

相似文献

1
Local environment perceived in daily life and urban green and blue space visits: Uncovering key factors for different age groups to access ecosystem services.日常生活中感知的本地环境与城市绿地和蓝色空间的使用:揭示不同年龄群体获得生态系统服务的关键因素。
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122676. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122676. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Distributional environmental justice of residential walking space: The lens of urban ecosystem services supply and demand.居住步行空间的分布环境正义:城市生态系统服务供需视角。
J Environ Manage. 2023 Mar 1;329:117050. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2022.117050. Epub 2022 Dec 28.
3
Green-blue space exposure changes and impact on individual-level well-being and mental health: a population-wide dynamic longitudinal panel study with linked survey data.绿地-蓝地暴露变化及其对个体幸福感和心理健康的影响:基于全国范围动态纵向面板研究和关联调查数据
Public Health Res (Southampt). 2023 Oct;11(10):1-176. doi: 10.3310/LQPT9410.
4
Inequality in access to cultural ecosystem services from protected areas in the Chilean biodiversity hotspot.智利生物多样性热点地区保护区内文化生态系统服务获取的不平等。
Sci Total Environ. 2018 Sep 15;636:1128-1138. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2018.04.353. Epub 2018 May 3.
5
Current and historical land use influence soil-based ecosystem services in an urban landscape.当前和历史土地利用对城市景观中的土壤基生态系统服务产生影响。
Ecol Appl. 2018 Apr;28(3):643-654. doi: 10.1002/eap.1689. Epub 2018 Mar 6.
6
How Green Space Justice in urban built-up areas affects public mental health: a moderated chain mediation model.城市建成区绿地公平性如何影响公众心理健康:一个有调节的链式中介模型。
Front Public Health. 2024 Oct 2;12:1442182. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1442182. eCollection 2024.
7
Quantifying the impact of green infrastructure change on landscape patterns using intensity analysis and landscape metrics in the Taipei metropolitan area.利用强度分析和景观指标量化台北都会区绿色基础设施变化对景观格局的影响。
Environ Monit Assess. 2023 Jun 3;195(7):805. doi: 10.1007/s10661-023-11384-6.
8
Ecosystem services and urban heat riskscape moderation: water, green spaces, and social inequality in Phoenix, USA.生态系统服务与城市热风险景观调节:美国凤凰城的水、绿地与社会不平等
Ecol Appl. 2011 Oct;21(7):2637-51. doi: 10.1890/10-1493.1.
9
The Minderoo-Monaco Commission on Plastics and Human Health.美诺集团-摩纳哥基金会塑料与人体健康委员会
Ann Glob Health. 2023 Mar 21;89(1):23. doi: 10.5334/aogh.4056. eCollection 2023.
10
Perceptions of ecosystem services, disservices and willingness-to-pay for urban green space conservation.对生态系统服务、非服务以及城市绿地保护支付意愿的认知。
J Environ Manage. 2020 Apr 15;260:110140. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2020.110140. Epub 2020 Jan 21.