Graduate School of Human Development and Environment, Kobe University, Tsurukabuto 3-11, Nada-ku, Kobe, 657-8501, Japan.
Faculty of Medicine, University of the Ryukyus, Uehara 207, Nishihara-cho, Nakagami-gun, Okinawa, 903-0215, Japan; Graduate School of Medicine, Kyoto University, Yoshida-Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, 606-8501, Japan.
J Environ Manage. 2024 Nov;370:122676. doi: 10.1016/j.jenvman.2024.122676. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
Inequality in access to green and blue spaces is a major issue in the field of environmental justice. Various factors significantly influence visitations to these spaces, including residential, commuting, and shopping areas. However, studies have mainly focused on residential environments. Analyzing the coupling of environmental and socioeconomic factors, including age, income, and childhood experience, and examining the direct and indirect effects of these factors for different age groups are needed to better understand the detailed context of inequalities in access to ecosystem services. We conducted a questionnaire survey and analysis to address these needs in an urban setting. The results demonstrate that several land use categories (i.e., agricultural lands in residential areas, grasslands near shopping areas, and deciduous forests near commuting destinations) positively correlated with visitation frequency, suggesting the lack thereof may be the cause of access inequalities. In particular, the perimeter per unit area of some land cover types, which shows the complexity of the form of each land cover category, was found to be a significant factor. We identified inequality in nature experience to be the key factor correlated with inequality in nature visits among the young age group. For the middle-aged and old age groups, nature-relatedness was positively correlated with visitation frequency. Proper design of the local environment, such as through land use planning, can be an effective measure for all age groups. For instance, long-bordered green areas in the Monsoon Asian region are an attractive traditional landscape, with high accessibility and a comfortable thermal environment. The key factors for each age group should be considered in spatial design and inclusive information-sharing to reduce inequality in access to ecosystem services.
在环境正义领域,绿色和蓝色空间获取方面的不平等是一个主要问题。各种因素极大地影响了这些空间的访问,包括居住、通勤和购物区。然而,研究主要集中在居住环境上。分析环境和社会经济因素的耦合,包括年龄、收入和童年经历,并研究这些因素对不同年龄组的直接和间接影响,对于更好地了解生态系统服务获取方面的不平等的详细情况是必要的。我们在城市环境中进行了问卷调查和分析,以解决这些需求。结果表明,几种土地利用类型(即居住区内的农业用地、购物区附近的草地和通勤目的地附近的落叶林)与访问频率呈正相关,这表明缺乏这些土地利用类型可能是造成获取不平等的原因。特别是,一些土地覆盖类型的单位面积周长,它显示了每个土地覆盖类型形式的复杂性,被发现是一个重要因素。我们发现,对于年轻群体来说,自然体验的不平等是与自然访问不平等相关的关键因素。对于中年和老年群体,与自然相关的因素与访问频率呈正相关。适当的当地环境设计,如土地利用规划,可以是所有年龄组的有效措施。例如,在季风亚洲地区,长边界的绿色区域是一种有吸引力的传统景观,具有较高的可达性和舒适的热环境。在空间设计和包容性信息共享中,应考虑每个年龄组的关键因素,以减少生态系统服务获取方面的不平等。