• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 Assay using fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples in a resource-constrained setting: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.在资源有限的环境中使用细针穿刺活检样本进行 Xpert 乳腺癌 STRAT4 检测:一项前瞻性诊断准确性研究。
Lancet Oncol. 2024 Nov;25(11):1440-1452. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00456-X. Epub 2024 Oct 3.
2
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
3
Variation within and between digital pathology and light microscopy for the diagnosis of histopathology slides: blinded crossover comparison study.数字病理学与光学显微镜检查在组织病理学切片诊断中的内部及相互间差异:双盲交叉对比研究
Health Technol Assess. 2025 Jul;29(30):1-75. doi: 10.3310/SPLK4325.
4
Comparison of Two Modern Survival Prediction Tools, SORG-MLA and METSSS, in Patients With Symptomatic Long-bone Metastases Who Underwent Local Treatment With Surgery Followed by Radiotherapy and With Radiotherapy Alone.两种现代生存预测工具 SORG-MLA 和 METSSS 在接受手术联合放疗和单纯放疗治疗有症状长骨转移患者中的比较。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Dec 1;482(12):2193-2208. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003185. Epub 2024 Jul 23.
5
The effect of sample site and collection procedure on identification of SARS-CoV-2 infection.样本采集部位和采集程序对严重急性呼吸综合征冠状病毒2(SARS-CoV-2)感染鉴定的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Dec 16;12(12):CD014780. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014780.
6
Can a Liquid Biopsy Detect Circulating Tumor DNA With Low-passage Whole-genome Sequencing in Patients With a Sarcoma? A Pilot Evaluation.液体活检能否通过低深度全基因组测序检测肉瘤患者的循环肿瘤DNA?一项初步评估。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2025 Jan 1;483(1):39-48. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003161. Epub 2024 Jun 21.
7
Rapid, point-of-care antigen tests for diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染诊断的快速、即时抗原检测。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Jul 22;7(7):CD013705. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013705.pub3.
8
Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale Anxiety subscale (HADS-A) for detecting anxiety disorders in adults.用于检测成人焦虑症的医院焦虑抑郁量表焦虑分量表(HADS-A)
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2025 Jul 2;7(7):CD015456. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015456.
9
Laboratory-based molecular test alternatives to RT-PCR for the diagnosis of SARS-CoV-2 infection.基于实验室的分子检测替代 RT-PCR 用于 SARS-CoV-2 感染的诊断。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Oct 14;10(10):CD015618. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015618.
10
Are Current Survival Prediction Tools Useful When Treating Subsequent Skeletal-related Events From Bone Metastases?当前的生存预测工具在治疗骨转移后的骨骼相关事件时有用吗?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2024 Sep 1;482(9):1710-1721. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000003030. Epub 2024 Mar 22.

本文引用的文献

1
The Lancet Breast Cancer Commission.《柳叶刀》乳腺癌委员会
Lancet. 2024 May 11;403(10439):1895-1950. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00747-5. Epub 2024 Apr 15.
2
Validation of the Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT 4 Assay on the GeneXpert instrument to Assess Hormone Receptor, Ki67, and HER2 Gene Expression Status in Breast Cancer Tissue Samples.在 GeneXpert 仪器上验证 Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT 4 检测,以评估乳腺癌组织样本中激素受体、Ki67 和 HER2 基因表达状态。
Appl Immunohistochem Mol Morphol. 2023 Oct 1;31(9):613-620. doi: 10.1097/PAI.0000000000001149. Epub 2023 Sep 14.
3
Rapid Onsite Evaluation for Specimen Adequacy and Triage of Breast Masses in a Low-Resource Setting.在资源有限的环境下,对乳腺肿块标本进行快速现场评估和分类。
Arch Pathol Lab Med. 2024 Jan 1;148(1):e9-e17. doi: 10.5858/arpa.2022-0398-OA.
4
XPERT breast cancer STRAT4 as an alternative method of identifying breast cancer phenotype in Cape Verde (preliminary results).XPERT乳腺癌STRAT4作为佛得角识别乳腺癌表型的替代方法(初步结果)。
Ecancermedicalscience. 2023 Apr 11;17:1530. doi: 10.3332/ecancer.2023.1530. eCollection 2023.
5
Breast cancer molecular diagnostics in Rwanda: a cost-minimization study of immunohistochemistry versus a novel GeneXpert mRNA expression assay.卢旺达的乳腺癌分子诊断学:免疫组织化学与新型 GeneXpert mRNA 表达测定的成本最小化研究。
Bull World Health Organ. 2023 Jan 1;101(1):10-19. doi: 10.2471/BLT.22.288800. Epub 2022 Nov 2.
6
Triple-negative breast cancer prevalence in Africa: a systematic review and meta-analysis.非洲三阴性乳腺癌的患病率:系统评价和荟萃分析。
BMJ Open. 2022 May 27;12(5):e055735. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-055735.
7
ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKi67 mRNA expression in postmenopausal women with hormone receptor-positive early breast cancer: results from ABCSG Trial 6.绝经后激素受体阳性早期乳腺癌患者 ESR1、PGR、ERBB2 和 MKi67 mRNA 表达:ABCGS 试验 6 的结果。
ESMO Open. 2021 Aug;6(4):100228. doi: 10.1016/j.esmoop.2021.100228. Epub 2021 Aug 7.
8
Customizing local and systemic therapies for women with early breast cancer: the St. Gallen International Consensus Guidelines for treatment of early breast cancer 2021.为早期乳腺癌女性定制局部和全身治疗方案:《2021年圣加仑早期乳腺癌治疗国际共识指南》
Ann Oncol. 2021 Oct;32(10):1216-1235. doi: 10.1016/j.annonc.2021.06.023. Epub 2021 Jul 6.
9
Use of the Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 for Biomarker Evaluation in Tissue Processed in a Developing Country.在发展中国家,使用 Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 进行组织处理中的生物标志物评估。
Am J Clin Pathol. 2021 Oct 13;156(5):766-776. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/aqab016.
10
Comparison of breast cancer surrogate subtyping using a closed-system RT-qPCR breast cancer assay and immunohistochemistry on 100 core needle biopsies with matching surgical specimens.使用封闭系统 RT-qPCR 乳腺癌检测和 100 例核心针活检与匹配手术标本的免疫组织化学检测对乳腺癌替代亚分型进行比较。
BMC Cancer. 2021 Apr 21;21(1):439. doi: 10.1186/s12885-021-08171-2.

在资源有限的环境中使用细针穿刺活检样本进行 Xpert 乳腺癌 STRAT4 检测:一项前瞻性诊断准确性研究。

Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 Assay using fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples in a resource-constrained setting: a prospective diagnostic accuracy study.

机构信息

Department of Pathology, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA; Department of Pathology and Laboratory Medicine, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.

Department of Pathology, Muhimbili University of Health and Allied Sciences, Dar es Salaam, Tanzania.

出版信息

Lancet Oncol. 2024 Nov;25(11):1440-1452. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00456-X. Epub 2024 Oct 3.

DOI:10.1016/S1470-2045(24)00456-X
PMID:39369731
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11684511/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Use of fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNAB) specimens on Xpert Breast Cancer STRAT4 Assay (STRAT4; Cepheid, Sunnyvale, CA, USA), a CE-marked in-vitro diagnostic medical device, could potentially increase access to breast cancer biomarker testing in resource-constrained settings. We aimed to assess the performance of a research use-only version of STRAT4 using FNAB specimens in Tanzania.

METHODS

In this prospective diagnostic accuracy study, patients aged 18 years or older with palpable breast masses presenting to the FNAB Clinic at Muhimbili National Hospital (Dar es Salaam, Tanzania) were recruited consecutively. Patients who were pregnant, lactating, or had a previous diagnosis of breast cancer were excluded. STRAT4 testing was performed on off-label FNAB samples using four protocols: the 1 × protocol (using the standard lysate method) on FNAB smears (1 × FNAB), quick lysis and Maui protocols (both on FNAB smears), and the 1 × protocol on formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded (FFPE) cell block material (1 × cell block). For 1 × FNAB and 1 × cell block, tissue was processed using FFPE lysis reagent, incubated at 80°C with proteinase K, and followed by addition of 95% or higher ethanol. Quick lysis was processed using FFPE lysis reagent and 95% or higher ethanol, whereas Maui was processed using a proprietary research-use only lysis reagent. The primary outcomes were overall concordance, sensitivity, specificity, and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) of STRAT4 as compared with immunohistochemistry or immunohistochemistry plus fluorescence in-situ hybridisation performed on cell blocks using clinically validated protocols in a Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments-accredited laboratory at the University of California, San Francisco (San Francisco, CA, USA).

FINDINGS

Between Nov 29, 2017, and Dec 17, 2020, 208 patients were enrolled. Of 208 cases, 51 (25%) were excluded from analysis because of insufficient tissue in the cell block or absent cell blocks, leaving 157 participants (all female) for analysis. For oestrogen receptor, 1 × FNAB had the best performance, with an overall concordance of 95% (95% CI 90-100), sensitivity of 94% (85-100), specificity of 97% (90-100), and AUC of 0·96 (0·81-1·00). For progesterone receptor, 1 × cell block had the best overall performance (overall concordance 89% [95% CI 84-95], sensitivity 91% [82-99], and specificity 89% [81-97], with an AUC of 0·93 [0·89-0·99]) and 1 × FNAB performed the best among the smear protocols, with a concordance of 84% (95% CI 74-93), sensitivity of 63% (43-82), specificity of 97% (92-100), and AUC of 0·91 (0·72-0·97). For HER2, Maui had the highest agreement, with an overall concordance of 93% (95% CI 89-98), sensitivity of 96% (88-100), specificity of 92% (87-98), and AUC of 0·95 (0·98-1·00). For Ki67, Maui had the best performance of smear protocols, with a concordance of 73% (95% CI 64-82), sensitivity of 70% (58-81), specificity of 81% (66-96), and AUC of 0·80 (0·54-0·82).

INTERPRETATION

Processing FNAB samples with STRAT4 is feasible in Tanzania, and performance for the oestrogen receptor is robust. Further optimisation of STRAT4 for FNAB has the potential to improve timely access to breast cancer diagnostics in resource-constrained settings.

FUNDING

US National Institutes of Health; UCSF Global Cancer Program, Helen Diller Family Comprehensive Cancer Center; UCSF Department of Pathology; and Cepheid.

摘要

背景

STRAT4 检测(STRAT4;Cepheid,加利福尼亚州森尼韦尔)是一种经过 CE 标记的体外诊断医疗器械,利用细针穿刺抽吸活检(FNAB)标本进行检测,有可能增加资源有限环境下进行乳腺癌生物标志物检测的机会。我们的目的是评估 STRAT4 的研究专用版本在坦桑尼亚使用 FNAB 标本的性能。

方法

这是一项前瞻性诊断准确性研究,连续纳入了 18 岁或以上,有可触及乳腺肿块,且于穆希比利国家医院(坦桑尼亚达累斯萨拉姆) FNAB 诊所就诊的患者。妊娠、哺乳期或有乳腺癌既往诊断的患者被排除在外。使用四种方案在研究专用的 STRAT4 上对 FNAB 标本进行检测:标准裂解液法的 1×方案(1×FNAB)用于 FNAB 涂片,快速裂解和 Maui 方案(均用于 FNAB 涂片),以及甲醛固定石蜡包埋(FFPE)细胞块材料的 1×方案(1×细胞块)。对于 1×FNAB 和 1×细胞块,组织使用 FFPE 裂解试剂处理,在 80°C 下与蛋白酶 K孵育,然后加入 95%或更高浓度的乙醇。快速裂解使用 FFPE 裂解试剂和 95%或更高浓度的乙醇,而 Maui 使用专有研究专用的裂解试剂。主要结局指标是与加利福尼亚大学旧金山分校(旧金山,加利福尼亚州)临床实验室改进修正案认证实验室中使用临床验证方案在细胞块上进行的免疫组织化学或免疫组织化学加荧光原位杂交相比,STRAT4 的总体一致性、敏感性、特异性和接受者操作特征曲线(ROC)下面积(AUC)。

结果

2017 年 11 月 29 日至 2020 年 12 月 17 日期间,共纳入 208 例患者。由于细胞块中组织不足或不存在细胞块,51 例(25%)患者被排除在分析之外,剩余 157 名(均为女性)参与者进行了分析。对于雌激素受体,1×FNAB 的表现最佳,总体一致性为 95%(95%CI 90-100),敏感性为 94%(85-100),特异性为 97%(90-100),AUC 为 0.96(0.81-1.00)。对于孕激素受体,1×细胞块的总体性能最佳(总体一致性为 89%(95%CI 84-95),敏感性为 91%(82-99),特异性为 89%(81-97%),AUC 为 0.93(0.89-0.99)),1×FNAB 在涂片方案中表现最佳,一致性为 84%(95%CI 74-93),敏感性为 63%(43-82),特异性为 97%(92-100),AUC 为 0.91(0.72-0.97)。对于 HER2,Maui 的一致性最高,总体一致性为 93%(95%CI 89-98),敏感性为 96%(88-100),特异性为 92%(87-98),AUC 为 0.95(0.98-1.00)。对于 Ki67,Maui 在涂片方案中的表现最佳,一致性为 73%(95%CI 64-82),敏感性为 70%(58-81),特异性为 81%(66-96),AUC 为 0.80(0.54-0.82)。

解释

在坦桑尼亚,使用 STRAT4 处理 FNAB 标本是可行的,雌激素受体的性能可靠。进一步优化 STRAT4 用于 FNAB 有可能改善资源有限环境下乳腺癌诊断的及时性。

资金来源

美国国立卫生研究院;加州大学旧金山分校全球癌症计划,海伦·迪勒家庭综合癌症中心;加州大学旧金山分校病理学系;和 Cepheid。