• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器人辅助中风康复对残余中风严重程度进行分类:机器学习方法。

Classifying Residual Stroke Severity Using Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning Approach.

作者信息

Jeter Russell, Greenfield Raymond, Housley Stephen N, Belykh Igor

机构信息

Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Georgia State University, Atlanta, GA, United States.

Motus Nova, LLC, Atlanta, GA, United States.

出版信息

JMIR Biomed Eng. 2024 Oct 7;9:e56980. doi: 10.2196/56980.

DOI:10.2196/56980
PMID:39374054
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11494252/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Stroke therapy is essential to reduce impairments and improve motor movements by engaging autogenous neuroplasticity. Traditionally, stroke rehabilitation occurs in inpatient and outpatient rehabilitation facilities. However, recent literature increasingly explores moving the recovery process into the home and integrating technology-based interventions. This study advances this goal by promoting in-home, autonomous recovery for patients who experienced a stroke through robotics-assisted rehabilitation and classifying stroke residual severity using machine learning methods.

OBJECTIVE

Our main objective is to use kinematics data collected during in-home, self-guided therapy sessions to develop supervised machine learning methods, to address a clinician's autonomous classification of stroke residual severity-labeled data toward improving in-home, robotics-assisted stroke rehabilitation.

METHODS

In total, 33 patients who experienced a stroke participated in in-home therapy sessions using Motus Nova robotics rehabilitation technology to capture upper and lower body motion. During each therapy session, the Motus Hand and Motus Foot devices collected movement data, assistance data, and activity-specific data. We then synthesized, processed, and summarized these data. Next, the therapy session data were paired with clinician-informed, discrete stroke residual severity labels: "no range of motion (ROM)," "low ROM," and "high ROM." Afterward, an 80%:20% split was performed to divide the dataset into a training set and a holdout test set. We used 4 machine learning algorithms to classify stroke residual severity: light gradient boosting (LGB), extra trees classifier, deep feed-forward neural network, and classical logistic regression. We selected models based on 10-fold cross-validation and measured their performance on a holdout test dataset using F-score to identify which model maximizes stroke residual severity classification accuracy.

RESULTS

We demonstrated that the LGB method provides the most reliable autonomous detection of stroke severity. The trained model is a consensus model that consists of 139 decision trees with up to 115 leaves each. This LGB model boasts a 96.70% F-score compared to logistic regression (55.82%), extra trees classifier (94.81%), and deep feed-forward neural network (70.11%).

CONCLUSIONS

We showed how objectively measured rehabilitation training paired with machine learning methods can be used to identify the residual stroke severity class, with efforts to enhance in-home self-guided, individualized stroke rehabilitation. The model we trained relies only on session summary statistics, meaning it can potentially be integrated into similar settings for real-time classification, such as outpatient rehabilitation facilities.

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/57108d5f7d1c/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/4837bfa0fb11/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/c7edc742a5ef/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/7757a5ea9f0c/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/0dbf99a8984a/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/ee516fb2948a/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/57108d5f7d1c/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/4837bfa0fb11/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/c7edc742a5ef/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/7757a5ea9f0c/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/0dbf99a8984a/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/ee516fb2948a/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/151a/11494252/57108d5f7d1c/biomedeng_v9i1e56980_fig6.jpg
摘要

背景

中风治疗对于通过激发自身神经可塑性来减少损伤和改善运动功能至关重要。传统上,中风康复在住院和门诊康复机构进行。然而,最近的文献越来越多地探索将康复过程转移到家庭中,并整合基于技术的干预措施。本研究通过机器人辅助康复促进中风患者在家中自主康复,并使用机器学习方法对中风残留严重程度进行分类,从而推进了这一目标。

目的

我们的主要目标是利用在家中自我指导治疗期间收集的运动学数据来开发监督机器学习方法,以解决临床医生对中风残留严重程度标记数据的自主分类问题,从而改善在家中进行的机器人辅助中风康复。

方法

共有33名中风患者参加了使用Motus Nova机器人康复技术的家庭治疗课程,以捕捉上半身和下半身的运动。在每次治疗课程中,Motus Hand和Motus Foot设备收集运动数据、辅助数据和特定活动数据。然后我们对这些数据进行了合成、处理和汇总。接下来,将治疗课程数据与临床医生告知的离散中风残留严重程度标签配对:“无活动范围(ROM)”、“低ROM”和“高ROM”。之后,进行80%:20%的划分,将数据集分为训练集和保留测试集。我们使用4种机器学习算法对中风残留严重程度进行分类:轻梯度提升(LGB)、极端随机树分类器、深度前馈神经网络和经典逻辑回归。我们基于10折交叉验证选择模型,并使用F分数在保留测试数据集上测量它们的性能,以确定哪种模型能最大化中风残留严重程度分类的准确性。

结果

我们证明LGB方法提供了最可靠的中风严重程度自主检测。训练后的模型是一个共识模型,由139个决策树组成,每个决策树最多有115个叶子节点。与逻辑回归(55.82%)、极端随机树分类器(94.81%)和深度前馈神经网络(70.11%)相比,这个LGB模型的F分数为96.70%。

结论

我们展示了如何将客观测量的康复训练与机器学习方法相结合,以识别中风残留严重程度类别,努力加强在家中自我指导的个性化中风康复。我们训练的模型仅依赖于课程汇总统计数据,这意味着它有可能被整合到类似的实时分类环境中,如门诊康复机构。

相似文献

1
Classifying Residual Stroke Severity Using Robotics-Assisted Stroke Rehabilitation: Machine Learning Approach.使用机器人辅助中风康复对残余中风严重程度进行分类:机器学习方法。
JMIR Biomed Eng. 2024 Oct 7;9:e56980. doi: 10.2196/56980.
2
Comparison of Supervised Machine Learning Algorithms for Classifying of Home Discharge Possibility in Convalescent Stroke Patients: A Secondary Analysis.基于机器学习的监督算法在恢复期脑卒中患者居家康复可能性分类中的比较:二次分析。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Oct;30(10):106011. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.106011. Epub 2021 Jul 26.
3
Construction of efficacious gait and upper limb functional interventions based on brain plasticity evidence and model-based measures for stroke patients.基于脑可塑性证据和基于模型的测量方法,为中风患者构建有效的步态和上肢功能干预措施。
ScientificWorldJournal. 2007 Dec 20;7:2031-45. doi: 10.1100/tsw.2007.299.
4
Deep convolutional neural network and IoT technology for healthcare.用于医疗保健的深度卷积神经网络和物联网技术。
Digit Health. 2024 Jan 17;10:20552076231220123. doi: 10.1177/20552076231220123. eCollection 2024 Jan-Dec.
5
The use of machine learning and deep learning techniques to assess proprioceptive impairments of the upper limb after stroke.使用机器学习和深度学习技术评估脑卒中后上肢本体感觉障碍。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2023 Jan 27;20(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s12984-023-01140-9.
6
Robot-assisted training compared with an enhanced upper limb therapy programme and with usual care for upper limb functional limitation after stroke: the RATULS three-group RCT.机器人辅助训练与强化上肢治疗方案以及常规护理相比,对脑卒中后上肢功能受限的影响:RATULS 三臂 RCT 研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2020 Oct;24(54):1-232. doi: 10.3310/hta24540.
7
Development and Clinical Evaluation of a Web-Based Upper Limb Home Rehabilitation System Using a Smartwatch and Machine Learning Model for Chronic Stroke Survivors: Prospective Comparative Study.基于智能手表和机器学习模型的上肢家庭康复系统的开发和临床评估:慢性脑卒中幸存者的前瞻性对比研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2020 Jul 9;8(7):e17216. doi: 10.2196/17216.
8
Can Predictive Modeling Tools Identify Patients at High Risk of Prolonged Opioid Use After ACL Reconstruction?预测模型工具能否识别 ACL 重建术后阿片类药物使用时间延长的高风险患者?
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jul;478(7):0-1618. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001251.
9
Mining Clinical Notes for Physical Rehabilitation Exercise Information: Natural Language Processing Algorithm Development and Validation Study.挖掘临床记录中的物理康复锻炼信息:自然语言处理算法的开发与验证研究
JMIR Med Inform. 2024 Apr 3;12:e52289. doi: 10.2196/52289.
10
Predicting recovery following stroke: Deep learning, multimodal data and feature selection using explainable AI.预测脑卒中后的恢复:使用可解释 AI 的深度学习、多模态数据和特征选择。
Neuroimage Clin. 2024;43:103638. doi: 10.1016/j.nicl.2024.103638. Epub 2024 Jul 2.

引用本文的文献

1
Explainable machine learning model for predicting decline in platelet count after interventional closure in children with patent ductus arteriosus.用于预测动脉导管未闭患儿介入封堵术后血小板计数下降的可解释机器学习模型。
Front Pediatr. 2025 Feb 6;13:1519002. doi: 10.3389/fped.2025.1519002. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Predicting mortality in brain stroke patients using neural networks: outcomes analysis in a longitudinal study.使用神经网络预测脑卒患者的死亡率:一项纵向研究的结果分析。
Sci Rep. 2023 Oct 28;13(1):18530. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-45877-8.
2
Examining Usability, Acceptability, and Adoption of a Self-Directed, Technology-Based Intervention for Upper Limb Rehabilitation After Stroke: Cohort Study.评估一种针对中风后上肢康复的自我导向式技术干预的可用性、可接受性及采用情况:队列研究。
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Aug 21;10:e45993. doi: 10.2196/45993.
3
Technologies in Home-Based Digital Rehabilitation: Scoping Review.
居家数字康复技术:范围综述
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Jul 27;10:e43615. doi: 10.2196/43615.
4
Use of the Digital Assistant Vigo in the Home Environment for Stroke Recovery: Focus Group Discussion With Specialists Working in Neurorehabilitation.在家中环境使用数字助理维戈促进中风康复:与神经康复领域专家的焦点小组讨论
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2023 Apr 14;10:e44285. doi: 10.2196/44285.
5
Predicting Outcome in Patients with Brain Injury: Differences between Machine Learning versus Conventional Statistics.预测脑损伤患者的预后:机器学习与传统统计学之间的差异
Biomedicines. 2022 Sep 13;10(9):2267. doi: 10.3390/biomedicines10092267.
6
Machine learning methods for functional recovery prediction and prognosis in post-stroke rehabilitation: a systematic review.机器学习方法在脑卒中康复中功能恢复预测和预后的应用:系统综述。
J Neuroeng Rehabil. 2022 Jun 3;19(1):54. doi: 10.1186/s12984-022-01032-4.
7
Remote Assessments of Hand Function in Neurological Disorders: Systematic Review.神经系统疾病中手部功能的远程评估:系统评价
JMIR Rehabil Assist Technol. 2022 Mar 9;9(1):e33157. doi: 10.2196/33157.
8
A Novel Extra Tree Ensemble Optimized DL Framework (ETEODL) for Early Detection of Diabetes.一种用于糖尿病早期检测的新型 Extra Tree 集成优化深度学习框架(ETEODL)。
Front Public Health. 2022 Feb 15;9:797877. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2021.797877. eCollection 2021.
9
Global, regional, and national burden of stroke and its risk factors, 1990-2019: a systematic analysis for the Global Burden of Disease Study 2019.1990—2019年全球、区域和国家的卒中负担及其风险因素:全球疾病负担研究2019的系统分析
Lancet Neurol. 2021 Oct;20(10):795-820. doi: 10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00252-0. Epub 2021 Sep 3.
10
Prediction of Motor Function in Stroke Patients Using Machine Learning Algorithm: Development of Practical Models.基于机器学习算法的脑卒中患者运动功能预测:实用模型的建立。
J Stroke Cerebrovasc Dis. 2021 Aug;30(8):105856. doi: 10.1016/j.jstrokecerebrovasdis.2021.105856. Epub 2021 May 19.