Department of History, Humanities, and Society, University of Rome Tor Vergata, Rome, Italy.
Psychiatr Danub. 2024 Sep;36(Suppl 2):34-39.
The increasing integration of eclectic knowledge from fields not directly related to clinical psychology is coherent with a current tendency to employ alternative ideas to investigate psychopathology in the light of a more phenomenological perspective. The concept of epistemic trust may provide the gateway to alternative causal models for personality psychopathology that links poor mentalizing environment to a more general lack of social support. People who have been denied the ability to trust the information circulating in their more proximate environment may showcase a remarkable disadvantage in terms of social adjustment that relate to early insecure attachment experiences. Research assumes that patients who have been suffering an epistemic deficient environment in infancy could be trapped into a vicious cycle of suffering, loneliness and inability to seek or accept help. Although most contributes cited in this brief article deal with epistemic trust as potential tool for social learning from a theoretical point of view, the recent introduction of systematic measures of epistemic trust as a dimensional personality variable outlines a likely future increase in the use of new questionnaires and protocols for clinical assessment and treatment monitoring expressively focused on epistemic trust. The benefits of adopting such a holistic etiological paradigm in personality pathology are outlined, as proposed by the many works that advocate a more equitable clinical practice that assume individual development in the context of an unequal social world, that is believed to determine the child's evolutionary trajectory from the very first stages of life. In the same vein, the importance of fostering an authentic relationship of trust between patient and therapist as a fundamental element of the therapeutic alliance, as well as a driving force for salutogenesis at the community level, is vividly highlighted.
日益融合来自与临床心理学不直接相关的领域的折衷知识,与当前倾向于利用替代理念,根据更现象学的观点研究精神病理学是一致的。认识信任的概念可能为人格精神病理学的替代因果模型提供途径,将不良的心理化环境与更普遍的缺乏社会支持联系起来。那些被剥夺了信任其更接近环境中信息的能力的人,在与早期不安全依恋经历有关的社会适应方面可能会表现出显著的劣势。研究假设,在婴儿期经历认知不足环境的患者可能会陷入痛苦、孤独和无法寻求或接受帮助的恶性循环。尽管本文引用的大多数文献都从理论角度将认知信任视为社会学习的潜在工具,但最近引入了认知信任的系统测量方法,作为一种维度人格变量,这可能预示着未来会更多地使用新的问卷和协议进行临床评估和治疗监测,明确关注认知信任。如许多倡导更公平临床实践的著作所主张的那样,采用这种人格病理学的整体病因范式的好处被概述出来,这些著作假设个体在不平等的社会环境中发展,这被认为决定了孩子从生命的最初阶段开始的进化轨迹。同样,在社区层面促进患者和治疗师之间建立真正的信任关系作为治疗联盟的基本要素,以及作为健康促进的驱动力的重要性也被生动地强调。