Neves João Sérgio, Leite Ana Rita, Mentz Robert J, Holman Rury R, Zannad Faiez, Butler Javed, Packer Milton, Ferreira João Pedro
Cardiovascular R&D Centre - UnIC@RISE, Department of Surgery and Physiology, Faculty of Medicine of the University of Porto, Porto, Portugal.
Department of Endocrinology, Diabetes and Metabolism, ULS São João, Porto, Portugal.
Eur J Heart Fail. 2025 Mar;27(3):540-551. doi: 10.1002/ejhf.3478. Epub 2024 Oct 9.
Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists reduce major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE) and cardiovascular mortality in people with type 2 diabetes (T2D). However, previous studies suggest the effects on heart failure outcomes vary according to left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF). We aimed to evaluate the effects of exenatide on cardiovascular events according to LVEF in people with T2D.
Post-hoc analysis of the Exenatide Study of Cardiovascular Event Lowering (EXSCEL) trial evaluating the effects of once-weekly exenatide (EQW) versus placebo on cardiovascular outcomes according to baseline LVEF (<40% or ≥40%). Outcomes were also evaluated according to New York Heart Association (NYHA) class and obesity. The main outcome was hospitalization for heart failure (HHF). A treatment-by-LVEF interaction was used. In EXSCEL (n = 14 752), 4749 participants had LVEF available at baseline; 455 (10%) with LVEF <40%, 4294 (90%) with LVEF ≥40%. LVEF modified the EQW effect on hHF: hazard ratio (HR) = 1.52 (95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.95-2.43) in participants with LVEF < 40% and HR = 0.74 (95% CI = 0.55-1.01) in those with LVEF ≥ 40% (p-interaction = 0.012). No significant treatment-by-LVEF interactions (p-interaction >0.10) were observed for MACE, cardiovascular death or all-cause mortality. The risk of HHF was also modified by baseline NYHA class (HR 0.91, 95% CI 0.65-1.27 for NYHA class I/II; HR 1.84, 95% CI 0.95-3.59 for NYHA class III/IV; p-interaction = 0.062), mostly driven by the LVEF <40% subgroup. Obesity did not modify the effects of EQW on HHF.
The EQW effect on HHF was influenced by LVEF, with a potentially decreased risk in participants with LVEF ≥40% and increased risk in those with LVEF <40%. The risk of HHF was particularly high in participants with LVEF <40% and NYHA class III/IV. LVEF did not modify the effect of EQW on atherosclerotic outcomes.
胰高血糖素样肽-1受体激动剂可降低2型糖尿病(T2D)患者的主要不良心血管事件(MACE)和心血管死亡率。然而,先前的研究表明,其对心力衰竭结局的影响因左心室射血分数(LVEF)而异。我们旨在评估艾塞那肽对T2D患者心血管事件的影响,并根据LVEF进行分析。
对艾塞那肽降低心血管事件研究(EXSCEL)试验进行事后分析,该试验评估了每周一次的艾塞那肽(EQW)与安慰剂相比,根据基线LVEF(<40%或≥40%)对心血管结局的影响。还根据纽约心脏协会(NYHA)分级和肥胖情况对结局进行了评估。主要结局是心力衰竭住院(HHF)。采用治疗与LVEF的交互作用分析。在EXSCEL试验(n = 14752)中,4749名参与者在基线时有可用的LVEF数据;455名(10%)LVEF<40%,4294名(90%)LVEF≥40%。LVEF改变了EQW对HHF的影响:LVEF<40%的参与者中,风险比(HR)= 1.52(95%置信区间[CI]=0.95 - 2.43);LVEF≥40%的参与者中,HR = 0.74(95% CI = 0.55 - 1.01)(交互作用p值 = 0.012)。对于MACE、心血管死亡或全因死亡率,未观察到显著的治疗与LVEF交互作用(交互作用p值>0.10)。HHF风险也因基线NYHA分级而改变(NYHA I/II级的HR为0.91,95% CI为0.65 - 1.27;NYHA III/IV级的HR为1.84,95% CI为0.95 - 3.59;交互作用p值 = 0.062),主要由LVEF<40%的亚组驱动。肥胖并未改变EQW对HHF的影响。
EQW对HHF的影响受LVEF影响,LVEF≥40%的参与者风险可能降低,而LVEF<40%的参与者风险增加。LVEF<40%且NYHA III/IV级的参与者HHF风险特别高。LVEF未改变EQW对动脉粥样硬化结局的影响。