Suppr超能文献

在小受试者中使用同轴和循环呼吸回路进行呼气二氧化碳测量的准确性。

Accuracy of expiratory carbon dioxide measurements using the coaxial and circle breathing circuits in small subjects.

作者信息

Schieber R A, Namnoum A, Sugden A, Saville A L, Orr R A

出版信息

J Clin Monit. 1985 Jul;1(3):149-55. doi: 10.1007/BF02832254.

Abstract

Mass spectrometry is widely used to measure the end-tidal concentrations of inhalation anesthetics and other gases during surgery in order to estimate their arterial concentrations. When certain breathing circuits are used in newborns, however, fresh gas or ambient air may contaminate the expired sample, introducing a systematic error in the measurement of any end-tidal gas concentration. We estimated this error in newborn piglets using carbon dioxide as an indicator substance of expired gas. The capnograms and the difference between arterial carbon dioxide tension (PaCO2) and peak-expired carbon dioxide tension (PeCO2) were compared when either a coaxial (Bain) or circle breathing circuit was used. Gas was sampled from the proximal airway and distal trachea. No combination of circuit and sampling site produced a flat alveolar phase until the circle circuit was modified with diversion valves to reduce gas mixing. The mean PaCO2-PeCO2 gradients using the coaxial/proximal sampling, coaxial/distal sampling, and modified circle/proximal sampling circuits were 12.4, 9.2, and 8.8 mm Hg, respectively. The mean PeCO2 in each of these combinations was significantly different from the corresponding mean PaCO2 (p less than 0.05). Using the modified circle circuit with distal sampling, mean PeCO2 was not significantly different from mean PaCO2: the mean PaCO2-PeCO2 gradient was 2.2 +/- 0.2 mm Hg (SEM), range, 0 to 6 mm Hg, with 95% confidence limits less than or equal to 8 mm Hg. When a coaxial breathing circuit is used in small subjects, PaCO2 may be significantly underestimated regardless of sampling site, although the circle breathing circuit with distal tracheal sampling yields accurate results.

摘要

质谱分析法被广泛用于测量手术期间吸入麻醉剂和其他气体的呼气末浓度,以便估算其动脉血浓度。然而,在新生儿使用某些呼吸回路时,新鲜气体或环境空气可能会污染呼出气体样本,从而在任何呼气末气体浓度的测量中引入系统误差。我们以二氧化碳作为呼出气体的指示物质,在新生仔猪中估算了这一误差。当使用同轴(贝恩)或环路呼吸回路时,比较了二氧化碳波形图以及动脉血二氧化碳分压(PaCO2)与呼出峰二氧化碳分压(PeCO2)之间的差值。气体从近端气道和远端气管采集。在使用分流阀对环路进行改造以减少气体混合之前,没有任何一种回路和采样部位的组合能产生平坦的肺泡相。使用同轴/近端采样、同轴/远端采样和改良环路/近端采样回路时,平均PaCO2 - PeCO2梯度分别为12.4、9.2和8.8毫米汞柱。这些组合中每种组合的平均PeCO2与相应的平均PaCO2均有显著差异(p小于0.05)。使用远端采样的改良环路时,平均PeCO2与平均PaCO2无显著差异:平均PaCO2 - PeCO2梯度为2.2±0.2毫米汞柱(标准误),范围为0至6毫米汞柱,95%置信区间小于或等于8毫米汞柱。当在小受试者中使用同轴呼吸回路时,无论采样部位如何,PaCO2可能会被显著低估,尽管使用远端气管采样的环路呼吸回路能得出准确结果。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验