Suppr超能文献

使用患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)比较三种不同浓度罗哌卡因用于分娩镇痛的有效性和安全性:一项双盲、随机对照试验。

Comparison of efficacy and safety of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for labor pain management using patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA): A double-blind, randomized controlled trial.

作者信息

Bihani Pooja, Vyas Medha, Soni Shikha, Jaju Rishabh, Janweja Sarita, Choudhary Usha

机构信息

Department of Anaesthesiology, Dr. S. N. Medical College, Jodhpur, Rajasthan, India.

Department of Anaesthesiology, St. John's Medical College and Hospital, Bengaluru, Karnataka, India.

出版信息

J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2024 Jul-Sep;40(3):463-469. doi: 10.4103/joacp.joacp_159_23. Epub 2024 Mar 15.

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND AIMS

Labor pain is consistently ranked high on the various pain rating scales, when compared to other painful life experiences, and the experience of labor during the process of childbirth is both complex and subjective. Though patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using dilute concentrations of local anesthetics (LAs) has been a popular method to control labor pain, yet the optimal dose and regimen for PCEA remain ambiguous. So, the present study was undertaken to evaluate the safety and efficacy of three different concentrations of ropivacaine for labor analgesia using PCEA.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Seventy-five healthy nulliparous women who gave voluntary consent for labor analgesia using PCEA were randomly assigned to three groups to receive three different ropivacaine concentrations (0.0625%, 0.1%, and 0.125%) with adjuvant fentanyl 2 μg/ml, after double-blinding. Analgesic efficacy, neuraxial blockade, vital parameters, neonatal outcomes, maternal satisfaction, and side effects were assessed. Primary outcome was total dose of ropivacaine consumed in milligrams.

RESULTS

Number of pain breakthroughs (Visual Analog Score >4) and PCEA demand and rescue boluses were found to be statistically more in group 0.0625% (P < 0.01), followed by group 0.1% and were the least in 0.125%. Still, total drug consumed in milligrams was significantly less in 0.0625% group. Maternal satisfaction was comparable among the three groups (P = 0.33). There was no significant difference in maternal side effects and neonatal APGAR scores among the three groups.

CONCLUSION

When three different concentrations of ropivacaine, that is, 0.0625%, 0.1%, and 0.125%, are used for labor analgesia, the use of 0.125% ropivacaine leads to higher total amount of ropivacaine consumed. Despite the lower efficacy in terms of breakthrough pain episodes observed with a 0.0625% ropivacaine concentration for labor analgesia, maternal satisfaction remained consistent across all three doses of ropivacaine. PCEA demand and rescue boluses for the lowest concentration, that is, 0.0625%; and did not affect maternal satisfaction with the management of labor pain.

摘要

背景与目的

与其他痛苦的生活经历相比,分娩疼痛在各种疼痛评分量表上的排名一直很高,并且分娩过程中的分娩体验既复杂又主观。尽管使用稀释浓度的局部麻醉药(LA)进行患者自控硬膜外镇痛(PCEA)一直是控制分娩疼痛的常用方法,但PCEA的最佳剂量和方案仍不明确。因此,本研究旨在评估三种不同浓度的罗哌卡因用于PCEA分娩镇痛的安全性和有效性。

材料与方法

75名自愿同意使用PCEA进行分娩镇痛的健康初产妇在双盲后被随机分为三组,接受三种不同浓度的罗哌卡因(0.0625%、0.1%和0.125%)加2μg/ml辅助芬太尼。评估镇痛效果、神经阻滞、生命体征参数、新生儿结局、产妇满意度和副作用。主要结局是罗哌卡因的总消耗量(以毫克计)。

结果

发现0.0625%组的疼痛突破次数(视觉模拟评分>4)、PCEA需求和补救推注量在统计学上更多(P<0.01),其次是0.1%组,0.125%组最少。然而,0.0625%组以毫克计的总药物消耗量显著较少。三组产妇满意度相当(P = 0.33)。三组产妇副作用和新生儿阿氏评分无显著差异。

结论

当使用三种不同浓度的罗哌卡因,即0.0625%、0.1%和0.125%进行分娩镇痛时,使用0.125%罗哌卡因会导致罗哌卡因的总消耗量更高。尽管0.0625%罗哌卡因浓度用于分娩镇痛时在突破性疼痛发作方面疗效较低,但所有三种罗哌卡因剂量下产妇满意度保持一致。最低浓度即0.0625%的PCEA需求和补救推注量;且不影响产妇对分娩疼痛管理的满意度。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验