Lin Shaogang, Chen Yusheng, Li Hongru, Chen Tingsang, Lin Qunying
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Putian University Putian 351100, Fujian, China.
Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine, Putian Pulmonary Hospital Putian 351100, Fujian, China.
Am J Transl Res. 2024 Sep 15;16(9):4885-4893. doi: 10.62347/LDHU7380. eCollection 2024.
To compare the diagnostic efficacy of metagenomic next generation sequencing (mNGS) with traditional fungal culture, (1,3)-β-D glucan (G) test, and galactomannan (GM) test in diagnosing invasive pulmonary aspergillosis (IPA) and to explore the advantages and disadvantages of mNGS for IPA diagnosis.
A retrospective analysis was conducted on 136 patients admitted to the Department of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine of Affiliated Hospital of Putian University from March 2018 to March 2020. Among them, there were 66 patients with IPA (IPA group) and 70 without (non-IPA group). Baseline data, inflammatory factors, cytokines, and specimens such as bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALF) and blood of these patients were collected. Fungal culture test, G test, GM test and mNGS test were performed. Information included for analysis encompassed patients' host factors, clinical features, chest scanning images, laboratory test results, and treatment outcome.
There was no statistical difference in the baseline data or inflammatory factors in patients between the IPA group and the non-IPA group. Further analysis showed that the sensitivity of mNGS in diagnosing IPA was 53.03%, which was higher than that of traditional fungal culture test (27.27%), G test (31.82%), and GM test (34.85%). Notably, when combining fungal culture, G test, GM test, and mNGS, the sensitivity increased to 69.70%, with a specificity of 97.14%. The sensitivity of the combined test was higher than that any of the tests alone for diagnosing IPA.
mNGS test offers superior diagnostic performance for IPA in comparison to traditional tests, particularly for testing samples like bronchoalveolar lavage fluid and bronchial secretions. The test result remains valuable even after aspergillus treatment. In addition, the use of mNGS in conjunction with other traditional tests, such as fungal culture test, G test, and GM test, can enhance the diagnostic efficacy for IPA.
比较宏基因组下一代测序(mNGS)与传统真菌培养、(1,3)-β-D葡聚糖(G)试验和半乳甘露聚糖(GM)试验在诊断侵袭性肺曲霉病(IPA)中的诊断效能,并探讨mNGS在IPA诊断中的优缺点。
对2018年3月至2020年3月在莆田学院附属医院呼吸与危重症医学科住院的136例患者进行回顾性分析。其中,IPA患者66例(IPA组),非IPA患者70例(非IPA组)。收集这些患者的基线数据、炎症因子、细胞因子以及支气管肺泡灌洗液(BALF)和血液等标本。进行真菌培养试验、G试验、GM试验和mNGS试验。分析的信息包括患者的宿主因素、临床特征、胸部扫描图像、实验室检查结果和治疗结果。
IPA组和非IPA组患者的基线数据或炎症因子无统计学差异。进一步分析显示,mNGS诊断IPA的敏感性为53.03%,高于传统真菌培养试验(27.27%)、G试验(31.82%)和GM试验(34.85%)。值得注意的是,将真菌培养、G试验、GM试验和mNGS联合使用时,敏感性提高到69.70%,特异性为97.14%。联合试验的敏感性高于单独使用任何一种试验诊断IPA的敏感性。
与传统试验相比,mNGS试验在IPA诊断中具有更高的诊断性能,特别是对于支气管肺泡灌洗液和支气管分泌物等样本的检测。即使在曲霉治疗后,检测结果仍然有价值。此外,将mNGS与其他传统试验,如真菌培养试验、G试验和GM试验联合使用,可以提高IPA的诊断效能。