de Groot Aafke J, Smit Ewout B, Keizer Dagmar, Hertogh Cees M P M, van Balen Romke, van der Wouden Johannes C, Wattel Elizabeth M
Department of medicine for older people, Amsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, de Boelelaan 1109, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Aging & Later Life, de Boelelaan 1117, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Int J Nurs Stud Adv. 2024 Sep 24;7:100245. doi: 10.1016/j.ijnsa.2024.100245. eCollection 2024 Dec.
Transitioning older hospital patients to the appropriate type of post-acute care has become an urgent clinical issue within the context of changing demographics and limited duration of hospital stay.
Consensus on assessments that guide post-acute care decision making would benefit potential patients and support cooperation between settings.
A national web-based questionnaire focusing on professional contributions, patient involvement and the use of triage items and measures.
Hospital and geriatric rehabilitation professionals in the Netherlands participated as respondent groups, representing 'sending' and 'receiving' professionals.
A comprehensive questionnaire was used with open, multiple choice and closed questions, exploring in detail how assessment of hospital patients in need of a post-acute care decision was performed. Descriptive statistics were applied together with deductive coding of qualitative data.
A total of 104 hospital liaison nurses (66.7 %) and 52 GR professionals (33.3 %) participated. Respondents were reasonably satisfied with the current triage practice. Hospital liaison nurses valued their operational responsibility for triage. Geriatric rehabilitation professionals wanted active involvement in decision making and deemed hospital paramedic expertise sub-optimally applied. 'Too little involvement' of patients and families was felt by 50.0 % of the GR respondents versus 15.5 % of hospital respondents. The importance of half (47.8 %) of the triage items was rated differently between respondent groups. When discussing complex cases between sending and receiving professionals, views were felt as complementary.
Both sending and receiving professionals expressed moderate satisfaction with post-acute care decision making, whereas their views on triage assessments differed according to setting and role. The patients' voice may be insufficiently heard in triage decisions. Shared expertise and a consensual approach can develop when triage consultation is facilitated by both hospitals and PAC facilities. This study offers ingredients to reach a multi-professional view on post-acute care decision making and referral to geriatric rehabilitation.
在人口结构变化和住院时间有限的背景下,将老年住院患者过渡到合适类型的急性后期护理已成为一个紧迫的临床问题。
就指导急性后期护理决策的评估达成共识将使潜在患者受益,并支持不同机构之间的合作。
一项基于网络的全国性调查问卷,重点关注专业贡献、患者参与以及分诊项目和措施的使用。
荷兰的医院和老年康复专业人员作为应答群体参与,分别代表“转出”和“接收”专业人员。
使用了一份包含开放式、多项选择题和封闭式问题的综合问卷,详细探讨了如何对需要进行急性后期护理决策的住院患者进行评估。应用描述性统计方法以及对定性数据进行演绎编码。
共有104名医院联络护士(66.7%)和52名老年康复专业人员(33.3%)参与。应答者对当前的分诊实践相当满意。医院联络护士重视他们在分诊方面的操作责任。老年康复专业人员希望积极参与决策,并认为医院护理人员的专业知识应用不够理想。50.0%的老年康复应答者认为患者和家属“参与过少”,而医院应答者中这一比例为15.5%。应答群体对一半(47.8%)的分诊项目的重要性评价不同。在转出和接收专业人员讨论复杂病例时,双方观点被认为具有互补性。
转出和接收专业人员对急性后期护理决策均表示中度满意,但其对分诊评估的观点因机构和角色而异。在分诊决策中可能没有充分听取患者的意见。当医院和急性后期护理机构都促进分诊咨询时,可以形成共享专业知识和共识性方法。本研究为就急性后期护理决策和转介至老年康复形成多专业观点提供了要素。