Suppr超能文献

从健康公平视角弥合政策实施差距:一项为期两年的测量方法开发研究的见解

Bridging the Gap in Policy Implementation through a Health Equity Lens: Insights from a 2-Year Study on Measurement Development.

作者信息

McLoughlin Gabriella M, Singleton Chelsea R, Walsh-Bailey Callie, Inman Rachel, Turner Lindsey

机构信息

Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, 1301 Cecil B. Moore Ave., Philadelphia, PA 19122, USA.

Implementation Science Center for Cancer Control, One Brookings Drive, Washington University in St. Louis, St. Louis, MO 63130, USA.

出版信息

Nutrients. 2024 Oct 2;16(19):3357. doi: 10.3390/nu16193357.

Abstract

Policy implementation measurement lacks an equity focus, which limits understanding of how policies addressing health inequities, such as Universal School Meals (USM) can elicit intended outcomes. We report findings from an equity-focused measurement development study, which had two aims: (1) identify key constructs related to the equitable implementation of school health policies and (2) establish face and content validity of measures assessing key implementation determinants, processes, and outcomes. : To address Aim 1, study participants (i.e., school health policy experts) completed a survey to rate the importance of constructs identified from implementation science and health equity by the research team. To accomplish Aim 2, the research team developed survey instruments to assess the key constructs identified from Aim 1 and conducted cognitive testing of these survey instruments among multiple user groups. The research team iteratively analyzed the data; feedback was categorized into "easy" or "moderate/difficult" to facilitate decision-making. : The Aim 1 survey had 122 responses from school health policy experts, including school staff ( = 76), researchers ( = 22), trainees ( = 3), leaders of non-profit organizations ( = 6), and others ( = 15). For Aim 2, cognitive testing feedback from 23 participants was predominantly classified as "easy" revisions (69%) versus "moderate/difficult" revisions (31%). Primary feedback themes comprised (1) comprehension and wording, (2) perceived lack of control over implementation, and (3) unclear descriptions of equity in questions. : Through adaptation and careful dissemination, these tools can be shared with implementation researchers and practitioners so they may equitably assess policy implementation in their respective settings.

摘要

政策实施评估缺乏对公平性的关注,这限制了我们对诸如普及学校供餐(USM)等解决健康不平等问题的政策如何产生预期效果的理解。我们报告了一项以公平为重点的评估发展研究的结果,该研究有两个目标:(1)确定与学校健康政策公平实施相关的关键概念;(2)确定评估关键实施决定因素、过程和结果的指标的表面效度和内容效度。为实现目标1,研究参与者(即学校健康政策专家)完成了一项调查,以对研究团队从实施科学和健康公平中确定的概念的重要性进行评分。为实现目标2,研究团队开发了调查工具来评估从目标1中确定的关键概念,并在多个用户群体中对这些调查工具进行了认知测试。研究团队对数据进行了迭代分析;反馈被分类为“容易”或“中等/困难”,以方便决策。目标1的调查收到了122份来自学校健康政策专家的回复,包括学校工作人员(n = 76)、研究人员(n = 22)、实习生(n = 3)、非营利组织领导人(n = 6)和其他人员(n = 15)。对于目标2,23名参与者的认知测试反馈主要被归类为“容易”修改(69%),而“中等/困难”修改为(31%)。主要反馈主题包括:(1)理解和措辞;(2)对实施缺乏控制感;(3)问题中公平性描述不清晰。通过调整和谨慎传播,这些工具可以与实施研究人员和从业者分享,以便他们能够在各自的环境中公平地评估政策实施情况。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/beb4/11478687/5f9c7263761b/nutrients-16-03357-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验