Khorram-Manesh Ruedeerat, Khorram-Manesh Amir
Hotel Management and Innovation Services, Nakhon Ratchasima Rajabhat University, Nakhon Ratchasima 30000, Thailand.
Institute of Clinical Sciences, Gothenburg University, 405 30 Gothenburg, Sweden.
AIMS Public Health. 2024 Jul 25;11(3):918-936. doi: 10.3934/publichealth.2024047. eCollection 2024.
Managing disasters and public health emergencies poses a complex challenge, particularly in maintaining the crucial elements of surge capacity, often referred to as the 4S: staff, stuff, space, and system. While discussions surrounding the management of these emergencies typically emphasize their impact on emergency healthcare services, resources, and capabilities, it is essential to recognize the inherent limitations of these resources. Therefore, integrating non-medical resources such as community staff, supplies, and spaces into the response chain is equally important. Among community facilities, hotels are particularly intriguing due to their organizational and structural capabilities to serve as alternative care sites for lightly injured or non-injured emergency victims. This narrative review explored the potential use of hotels as alternative care sites and the legal implications associated with such utilization. The results confirmed a high potential for using hotels as alternate care sites. However, data concerning its practical and legal implications are insufficient. This paper suggests further research to investigate the criteria for utilizing hotels in this capacity, including admission guidelines for disaster victims and relevant ethical and legal considerations.
应对灾害和突发公共卫生事件是一项复杂的挑战,尤其是在维持应急能力的关键要素方面,这些要素通常被称为“4S”:人员、物资、空间和系统。虽然围绕这些突发事件管理的讨论通常强调它们对应急医疗服务、资源和能力的影响,但认识到这些资源的固有局限性至关重要。因此,将社区人员、物资和空间等非医疗资源纳入应对链条同样重要。在社区设施中,酒店因其具备作为轻伤或未受伤应急受害者替代护理场所的组织和结构能力而格外引人注目。这篇叙述性综述探讨了酒店作为替代护理场所的潜在用途以及与此类利用相关的法律问题。结果证实酒店作为替代护理场所有很大潜力。然而,关于其实际和法律影响的数据并不充分。本文建议进一步开展研究,以调查以这种方式利用酒店的标准,包括灾害受害者的收治指南以及相关的伦理和法律考量。