• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

胺碘酮用于难治性心房颤动。

Amiodarone for refractory atrial fibrillation.

作者信息

Gold R L, Haffajee C I, Charos G, Sloan K, Baker S, Alpert J S

出版信息

Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jan 1;57(1):124-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90964-1.

DOI:10.1016/0002-9149(86)90964-1
PMID:3942054
Abstract

Atrial fibrillation (AF) is a difficult arrhythmia to manage with antiarrhythmic agents. Amiodarone is highly effective in restoring and maintaining normal sinus rhythm in patients with AF. However, the mechanism and predictors of efficacy for amiodarone in treating AF have not been adequately addressed. Various measures of success or failure of amiodarone therapy were examined in 68 patients who had paroxysmal or chronic, established AF refractory to conventional antiarrhythmic agents. The patients were 25 to 75 years old (mean 59) and mean follow-up was 21 months (range 3 to 56). Maintenance amiodarone dosages were 200 to 400 mg/day. Overall, amiodarone therapy was effective long term in 54 of the 68 patients (79%). Left atrial diameter, age, gender and origin of AF were not helpful in predicting success or failure of amiodarone therapy. The presence of chronic AF for longer than 1 year was an adverse factor in maintaining normal sinus rhythm (p = 0.007), although the success rate even in this group was relatively high (57%). Thirty-five percent of the patients had adverse effects, which precluded long-term therapy with amiodarone in 10%.

摘要

心房颤动(AF)是一种使用抗心律失常药物难以控制的心律失常。胺碘酮在恢复和维持AF患者的正常窦性心律方面非常有效。然而,胺碘酮治疗AF的疗效机制和预测因素尚未得到充分探讨。在68例对传统抗心律失常药物难治的阵发性或慢性持续性AF患者中,研究了胺碘酮治疗成功或失败的各种指标。患者年龄在25至75岁之间(平均59岁),平均随访时间为21个月(范围3至56个月)。胺碘酮维持剂量为每日200至400毫克。总体而言,68例患者中有54例(79%)长期接受胺碘酮治疗有效。左心房直径、年龄、性别和AF的起源对预测胺碘酮治疗的成功或失败并无帮助。慢性AF持续超过1年是维持正常窦性心律的不利因素(p = 0.007),尽管该组的成功率相对较高(57%)。35%的患者出现不良反应,其中10%的患者因不良反应而无法长期使用胺碘酮治疗。

相似文献

1
Amiodarone for refractory atrial fibrillation.胺碘酮用于难治性心房颤动。
Am J Cardiol. 1986 Jan 1;57(1):124-7. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(86)90964-1.
2
Long-term efficacy of amiodarone for the maintenance of normal sinus rhythm in patients with refractory atrial fibrillation or flutter.胺碘酮对难治性心房颤动或心房扑动患者维持正常窦性心律的长期疗效。
Am J Cardiol. 1995 Jul 1;76(1):47-50. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)80799-1.
3
Amiodarone in atrial fibrillation.
Acta Med Scand. 1984;216(5):517-24. doi: 10.1111/j.0954-6820.1984.tb05040.x.
4
Combination therapy with amiodarone and enalapril in patients with paroxysmal atrial fibrillation prevents the development of structural atrial remodeling.胺碘酮与依那普利联合治疗阵发性心房颤动患者可预防心房结构重塑的发生。
Int Heart J. 2008 Jul;49(4):435-47. doi: 10.1536/ihj.49.435.
5
[Role amiodarone in sinus rhythm maintenance after successful cardioversion in patients with chronic non-valvular atrial fibrillation].[胺碘酮在慢性非瓣膜性心房颤动患者成功复律后维持窦性心律中的作用]
Pol Arch Med Wewn. 2002 Dec;108(6):1151-60.
6
Amiodarone in long term management of refractory cardiac tachyarrhythmias.胺碘酮用于难治性心脏快速性心律失常的长期管理。
N Z Med J. 1981 Jan 28;93(676):31-5.
7
Low-dose amiodarone for atrial fibrillation.低剂量胺碘酮用于治疗心房颤动。
Am J Cardiol. 1993 Nov 26;72(16):75F-81F. doi: 10.1016/0002-9149(93)90967-h.
8
Pharmacologic reversion of persistent atrial fibrillation with amiodarone predicts long-term sinus rhythm maintenance.胺碘酮对持续性心房颤动的药物复律可预测长期窦性心律维持。
J Cardiovasc Pharmacol Ther. 2003 Sep;8(3):179-86. doi: 10.1177/107424840300800302.
9
Antiarrhythmic agents for atrial fibrillation: focus on prolonging atrial repolarization.用于心房颤动的抗心律失常药物:聚焦于延长心房复极
Am J Cardiol. 1999 Nov 4;84(9A):161R-173R. doi: 10.1016/s0002-9149(99)00718-3.
10
Amiodarone for the maintenance of sinus rhythm in patients with atrial fibrillation.胺碘酮用于维持心房颤动患者的窦性心律。
Ann Pharmacother. 1995 Jun;29(6):596-602. doi: 10.1177/106002809502900609.

引用本文的文献

1
Antiarrhythmics for maintaining sinus rhythm after cardioversion of atrial fibrillation.心房颤动复律后维持窦性心律的抗心律失常药物。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2019 Sep 4;9(9):CD005049. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005049.pub5.
2
Aggravation of atrial arrhythmia by amiodarone during the perinatal period: A case report.围产期胺碘酮加重房性心律失常:一例报告
Medicine (Baltimore). 2019 Feb;98(7):e14466. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000014466.
3
Low heart deceleration capacity imply higher atrial fibrillation-free rate after ablation.
低心率减速能力意味着消融后无房颤发生率更高。
Sci Rep. 2018 Apr 3;8(1):5537. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-23970-7.
4
Atrial Fibrillation: The New Epidemic of the Ageing World.心房颤动:老龄化世界的新流行病。
J Atr Fibrillation. 2009 Apr 1;1(6):154. doi: 10.4022/jafib.154. eCollection 2009 Apr-May.
5
Atrial Septal Defect and Atrial Fibrillation: The Known and Unknown.房间隔缺损与心房颤动:已知与未知
J Atr Fibrillation. 2008 Sep 16;1(3):45. doi: 10.4022/jafib.45. eCollection 2008 Sep-Nov.
6
Comparison of the effects of bepridil and aprindine for the prevention of atrial fibrillation after cardiac and aortic surgery: A prospective randomized study.比较苄普地尔和茚丙胺预防心脏和主动脉手术后房颤的效果:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Arrhythm. 2015 Oct;31(5):302-6. doi: 10.1016/j.joa.2015.04.003. Epub 2015 May 16.
7
Atrial fibrillation and stroke: the evolving role of rhythm control.心房颤动与中风:节律控制的演变作用
Curr Treat Options Cardiovasc Med. 2013 Jun;15(3):299-312. doi: 10.1007/s11936-013-0234-9.
8
Long-term sinus rhythm maintenance after cardioversion of persistent atrial fibrillation: is the treatment's success predictable?持续性心房颤动复律后长期窦性心律维持:治疗成功是否可预测?
Heart Vessels. 2006 Nov;21(6):375-81. doi: 10.1007/s00380-006-0915-3. Epub 2006 Nov 27.
9
[Molecular biology of the heart atrium. New insights into the pathophysiology of atrial fibrillation as well as its clinical implications].[心房的分子生物学。心房颤动病理生理学的新见解及其临床意义]
Z Kardiol. 2004 Nov;93(11):864-77. doi: 10.1007/s00392-004-0147-4.
10
New approaches to atrial fibrillation management: a critical review of a rapidly evolving field.心房颤动管理的新方法:对一个快速发展领域的批判性综述。
Drugs. 2002;62(16):2377-97. doi: 10.2165/00003495-200262160-00005.