• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

使用机器学习预测自发性脑出血患者的脑水肿

Predicting cerebral edema in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using machine learning.

作者信息

Xu Jiangbao, Yuan Cuijie, Yu Guofeng, Li Hao, Dong Qiutong, Mao Dandan, Zhan Chengpeng, Yan Xinjiang

机构信息

The Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University, Quzhou People's Hospital, Quzhou, China.

Postgraduate Training Base Alliance of Wenzhou Medical University, Wenzhou, China.

出版信息

Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 3;15:1419608. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1419608. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fneur.2024.1419608
PMID:39421568
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11484451/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The early prediction of cerebral edema changes in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage (SICH) may facilitate earlier interventions and result in improved outcomes. This study aimed to develop and validate machine learning models to predict cerebral edema changes within 72 h, using readily available clinical parameters, and to identify relevant influencing factors.

METHODS

An observational study was conducted between April 2021 and October 2023 at the Quzhou Affiliated Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University. After preprocessing the data, the study population was randomly divided into training and internal validation cohorts in a 7:3 ratio (training:  = 150; validation:  = 65). The most relevant variables were selected using Support Vector Machine Recursive Feature Elimination (SVM-RFE) and Least Absolute Shrinkage and Selection Operator (LASSO) algorithms. The predictive performance of random forest (RF), GDBT, linear regression (LR), and XGBoost models was evaluated using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUROC), precision-recall curve (AUPRC), accuracy, F1-score, precision, recall, sensitivity, and specificity. Feature importance was calculated, and the SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) and Local Interpretable Model-Agnostic Explanations (LIME) methods were employed to explain the top-performing model.

RESULTS

A total of 84 (39.1%) patients developed cerebral edema changes. In the validation cohort, GDBT outperformed LR and RF, achieving an AUC of 0.654 (95% CI: 0.611-0.699) compared to LR of 0.578 (95% CI, 0.535-0.623, DeLong:  = 0.197) and RF of 0.624 (95% CI, 0.588-0.687, DeLong:  = 0.236). XGBoost also demonstrated similar performance with an AUC of 0.660 (95% CI, 0.611-0.711, DeLong:  = 0.963). However, in the training set, GDBT still outperformed XGBoost, with an AUC of 0.603 ± 0.100 compared to XGBoost of 0.575 ± 0.096. SHAP analysis revealed that serum sodium, HDL, subarachnoid hemorrhage volume, sex, and left basal ganglia hemorrhage volume were the top five most important features for predicting cerebral edema changes in the GDBT model.

CONCLUSION

The GDBT model demonstrated the best performance in predicting 72-h changes in cerebral edema. It has the potential to assist clinicians in identifying high-risk patients and guiding clinical decision-making.

摘要

背景

自发性脑出血(SICH)患者脑水肿变化的早期预测有助于早期干预并改善预后。本研究旨在开发并验证机器学习模型,以利用现成的临床参数预测72小时内的脑水肿变化,并确定相关影响因素。

方法

2021年4月至2023年10月在温州医科大学附属衢州医院进行了一项观察性研究。对数据进行预处理后,研究人群以7:3的比例随机分为训练队列和内部验证队列(训练组:=150;验证组:=65)。使用支持向量机递归特征消除(SVM-RFE)和最小绝对收缩与选择算子(LASSO)算法选择最相关的变量。使用受试者操作特征曲线下面积(AUROC)、精确召回率曲线(AUPRC)、准确率、F1分数、精确率、召回率、敏感性和特异性评估随机森林(RF)、梯度提升决策树(GDBT)、线性回归(LR)和XGBoost模型的预测性能。计算特征重要性,并采用夏普利值附加解释(SHAP)和局部可解释模型无关解释(LIME)方法解释表现最佳的模型。

结果

共有84例(39.1%)患者出现脑水肿变化。在验证队列中,GDBT的表现优于LR和RF,AUC为0.654(95%CI:0.611-0.699),而LR为0.578(95%CI,0.535-0.623,德龙检验:=0.197),RF为0.624(95%CI,0.588-0.687,德龙检验:=0.236)。XGBoost也表现出类似的性能,AUC为0.660(95%CI,0.611-0.711,德龙检验:=0.963)。然而,在训练集中,GDBT的表现仍优于XGBoost,AUC为0.603±0.100,而XGBoost为0.575±0.096。SHAP分析显示,血清钠、高密度脂蛋白、蛛网膜下腔出血量、性别和左侧基底节出血量是GDBT模型中预测脑水肿变化最重要的五个特征。

结论

GDBT模型在预测脑水肿72小时变化方面表现最佳。它有可能帮助临床医生识别高危患者并指导临床决策。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/4b6fe2847eba/fneur-15-1419608-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/9a9ceda86a8e/fneur-15-1419608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/83ee424a0b4c/fneur-15-1419608-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/1ad182875938/fneur-15-1419608-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/600687445a14/fneur-15-1419608-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/5435a36aa843/fneur-15-1419608-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/219fd0ad1c4f/fneur-15-1419608-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/4b6fe2847eba/fneur-15-1419608-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/9a9ceda86a8e/fneur-15-1419608-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/83ee424a0b4c/fneur-15-1419608-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/1ad182875938/fneur-15-1419608-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/600687445a14/fneur-15-1419608-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/5435a36aa843/fneur-15-1419608-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/219fd0ad1c4f/fneur-15-1419608-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/74ae/11484451/4b6fe2847eba/fneur-15-1419608-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting cerebral edema in patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage using machine learning.使用机器学习预测自发性脑出血患者的脑水肿
Front Neurol. 2024 Oct 3;15:1419608. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2024.1419608. eCollection 2024.
2
Development and validation of a machine learning-based predictive model for assessing the 90-day prognostic outcome of patients with spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage.基于机器学习的预测模型评估自发性脑出血患者 90 天预后结局的开发与验证。
J Transl Med. 2024 Mar 4;22(1):236. doi: 10.1186/s12967-024-04896-3.
3
Interpretable machine learning model for early prediction of 28-day mortality in ICU patients with sepsis-induced coagulopathy: development and validation.用于脓毒症诱导性凝血病 ICU 患者 28 天死亡率早期预测的可解释机器学习模型:开发与验证。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jan 3;29(1):14. doi: 10.1186/s40001-023-01593-7.
4
A Comparison of LASSO Regression and Tree-Based Models for Delayed Cerebral Ischemia in Elderly Patients With Subarachnoid Hemorrhage.蛛网膜下腔出血老年患者迟发性脑缺血的套索回归与基于树的模型比较
Front Neurol. 2022 Mar 10;13:791547. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2022.791547. eCollection 2022.
5
Advancing polytrauma care: developing and validating machine learning models for early mortality prediction.推进多发伤救治:开发和验证用于早期死亡率预测的机器学习模型。
J Transl Med. 2023 Sep 25;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04487-8.
6
Predictive model and risk analysis for peripheral vascular disease in type 2 diabetes mellitus patients using machine learning and shapley additive explanation.基于机器学习和 Shapley 加法解释的 2 型糖尿病患者外周血管疾病预测模型和风险分析。
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2024 Feb 28;15:1320335. doi: 10.3389/fendo.2024.1320335. eCollection 2024.
7
A simple machine learning model for the prediction of acute kidney injury following noncardiac surgery in geriatric patients: a prospective cohort study.一种用于预测老年非心脏手术后急性肾损伤的简单机器学习模型:一项前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Geriatr. 2024 Jun 25;24(1):549. doi: 10.1186/s12877-024-05148-1.
8
Comparison of Conventional Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Multicentric Observational Cohort Study.传统逻辑回归与机器学习方法预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后迟发性脑缺血的比较:一项多中心观察性队列研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jun 17;14:857521. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.857521. eCollection 2022.
9
Machine learning-enabled prediction of prolonged length of stay in hospital after surgery for tuberculosis spondylitis patients with unbalanced data: a novel approach using explainable artificial intelligence (XAI).机器学习在数据不平衡的情况下预测脊柱结核手术后住院时间延长的预测:一种使用可解释人工智能 (XAI) 的新方法。
Eur J Med Res. 2024 Jul 25;29(1):383. doi: 10.1186/s40001-024-01988-0.
10
Interpretable machine learning for predicting 28-day all-cause in-hospital mortality for hypertensive ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke patients in the ICU: a multi-center retrospective cohort study with internal and external cross-validation.用于预测重症监护病房中高血压性缺血性或出血性中风患者28天全因院内死亡率的可解释机器学习:一项具有内部和外部交叉验证的多中心回顾性队列研究
Front Neurol. 2023 Aug 8;14:1185447. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1185447. eCollection 2023.

引用本文的文献

1
Global collaboration and innovation in malignant cerebral edema research: a bibliometric perspective.恶性脑水肿研究中的全球合作与创新:文献计量学视角
Front Neurol. 2025 Jul 23;16:1624101. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2025.1624101. eCollection 2025.

本文引用的文献

1
Risk factors for unfavorable outcome after spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage in elderly patients.老年患者自发性脑出血不良预后的危险因素。
Clin Neurol Neurosurg. 2024 May;240:108253. doi: 10.1016/j.clineuro.2024.108253. Epub 2024 Mar 22.
2
Comparison of LASSO and random forest models for predicting the risk of premature coronary artery disease.比较 LASSO 和随机森林模型预测早发冠心病的风险。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2023 Dec 20;23(1):297. doi: 10.1186/s12911-023-02407-w.
3
Statins and 90-Day Functional Performance and Survival in Patients with Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage.
他汀类药物与自发性脑出血患者90天功能表现及生存率
J Clin Med. 2023 Oct 19;12(20):6608. doi: 10.3390/jcm12206608.
4
Advancing polytrauma care: developing and validating machine learning models for early mortality prediction.推进多发伤救治:开发和验证用于早期死亡率预测的机器学习模型。
J Transl Med. 2023 Sep 25;21(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12967-023-04487-8.
5
3D slicer-based calculation of hematoma irregularity index for predicting hematoma expansion in intracerebral hemorrhage.基于 3D slicer 的血肿不规则指数计算预测脑出血血肿扩大。
BMC Neurol. 2022 Dec 5;22(1):452. doi: 10.1186/s12883-022-02983-w.
6
Rapid detection of phenytoin sodium by partial-least squares and linear regression models combined with surface-enhanced Raman spectroscopy.基于偏最小二乘法和线性回归模型的表面增强拉曼光谱法快速检测苯妥英钠。
J Pharm Biomed Anal. 2023 Jan 20;223:115160. doi: 10.1016/j.jpba.2022.115160. Epub 2022 Nov 11.
7
Cerebral edema after ischemic stroke: Pathophysiology and underlying mechanisms.缺血性脑卒中后的脑水肿:病理生理学及潜在机制
Front Neurosci. 2022 Aug 18;16:988283. doi: 10.3389/fnins.2022.988283. eCollection 2022.
8
Comparison of Conventional Logistic Regression and Machine Learning Methods for Predicting Delayed Cerebral Ischemia After Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage: A Multicentric Observational Cohort Study.传统逻辑回归与机器学习方法预测动脉瘤性蛛网膜下腔出血后迟发性脑缺血的比较:一项多中心观察性队列研究
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Jun 17;14:857521. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.857521. eCollection 2022.
9
External validation study on the value of deep learning algorithm for the prediction of hematoma expansion from noncontrast CT scans.基于非对比 CT 扫描的深度学习算法预测血肿扩大的外部验证研究。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Mar 14;22(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00772-y.
10
A Novel Coagulation Classification and Postoperative Bleeding in Severe Spontaneous Intracerebral Hemorrhage Patients on Antiplatelet Therapy.抗血小板治疗的重症自发性脑出血患者的新型凝血分类与术后出血
Front Aging Neurosci. 2022 Feb 16;14:793129. doi: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.793129. eCollection 2022.