• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一份评估对肉类依恋程度的四项法语问卷的效度。

Validity of a four-item questionnaire in French assessing attachment to meat.

作者信息

Sebo Paul, Tudrej Benoit, Bernard Augustin, Delaunay Bruno, Dupuy Alexandra, Malavergne Claire, Maisonneuve Hubert

机构信息

University Institute for Primary Care (IuMFE), University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.

University College of General Medicine, University Claude Bernard Lyon 1, Lyon, France.

出版信息

Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 4;11:1383825. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1383825. eCollection 2024.

DOI:10.3389/fmed.2024.1383825
PMID:39430593
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11486648/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

The 16-item Meat Attachment Questionnaire (MAQ-16) assesses emotional and cognitive attachment to meat across four dimensions: hedonism, affinity, entitlement, and dependence. Recently validated in French, we aimed to develop and validate a shorter, four-item version (MAQ-4) to reduce participant burden.

METHODS

In this 2023 observational study in the Rhône-Alpes region, 919 primary care patients were invited to complete the French MAQ-16 (MAQ-16). Classical test theory guided the development of the MAQ-4, and Spearman's correlation coefficients assessed its correlation with the MAQ-16 (dimension and overall scores). We also evaluated the diagnostic performance of the MAQ-4 for identifying patients with high meat attachment (MAQ-16 score > 60).

RESULTS

A total of 822 patients participated (65.3% women; median age = 52; participation rate = 89.5%). The MAQ-4 showed strong correlations with the MAQ-16 (rho = 0.83 for hedonism, 0.77 for affinity, 0.70 for entitlement, 0.79 for dependence, and 0.86 for the overall score, all -values <0.001). A score < 15 on the MAQ-4 (sensitivity = 91%, NPV = 96%) effectively excluded patients with low meat attachment, while a score ≥ 17 (specificity = 96%, PPV = 84%) accurately identified those with high attachment.

CONCLUSION

The MAQ-4 demonstrated strong correlation with the MAQ-16 and accurately identified high attachment to meat. It may serve as a useful tool in research and clinical settings, though further validation is required before broad implementation in French primary care.

摘要

背景

16项肉类依恋问卷(MAQ - 16)从四个维度评估对肉类的情感和认知依恋:享乐主义、亲和力、权利意识和依赖性。最近该问卷已在法语中得到验证,我们旨在开发并验证一个更简短的四项版本(MAQ - 4)以减轻参与者负担。

方法

在这项2023年于罗讷 - 阿尔卑斯地区进行的观察性研究中,邀请了919名初级保健患者完成法语版MAQ - 16(MAQ - 16)。经典测试理论指导了MAQ - 4的开发,斯皮尔曼相关系数评估了其与MAQ - 16(维度和总分)的相关性。我们还评估了MAQ - 4在识别肉类依恋程度高的患者(MAQ - 16得分>60)方面的诊断性能。

结果

共有822名患者参与(65.3%为女性;中位年龄 = 52岁;参与率 = 89.5%)。MAQ - 4与MAQ - 16显示出很强的相关性(享乐主义维度rho = 0.83,亲和力维度rho = 0.77,权利意识维度rho = 0.70,依赖性维度rho = 0.79,总分rho = 0.86,所有p值<0.001)。MAQ - 4得分<15(敏感性 = 91%,阴性预测值 = 96%)可有效排除肉类依恋程度低的患者,而得分≥17(特异性 = 96%,阳性预测值 = 84%)可准确识别出依恋程度高的患者。

结论

MAQ - 4与MAQ - 16显示出很强的相关性,并能准确识别出对肉类的高度依恋。它可能在研究和临床环境中作为一种有用的工具,不过在法语初级保健中广泛应用之前还需要进一步验证。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d67/11486648/06cef40dabbf/fmed-11-1383825-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d67/11486648/f47b5c6b083f/fmed-11-1383825-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d67/11486648/06cef40dabbf/fmed-11-1383825-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d67/11486648/f47b5c6b083f/fmed-11-1383825-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8d67/11486648/06cef40dabbf/fmed-11-1383825-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Validity of a four-item questionnaire in French assessing attachment to meat.一份评估对肉类依恋程度的四项法语问卷的效度。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2024 Oct 4;11:1383825. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2024.1383825. eCollection 2024.
2
Attached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet.与肉类有关?采用更以植物为基础的饮食的(不)意愿和意图。
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
3
Is Eating Less Meat Possible? Exploring the Willingness to Reduce Meat Consumption among Millennials Working in Polish Cities.少吃肉可行吗?探究波兰城市中千禧一代减少肉类消费的意愿。
Foods. 2022 Jan 26;11(3):358. doi: 10.3390/foods11030358.
4
The Munich Ankle Questionnaire (MAQ): a self-assessment tool for a comprehensive evaluation of ankle disorders.慕尼黑踝关节问卷(MAQ):一种用于全面评估踝关节疾病的自我评估工具。
Eur J Med Res. 2018 Sep 28;23(1):46. doi: 10.1186/s40001-018-0344-7.
5
Assessing Mobile Phone Attachment: Validation of the Mobile Attachment Questionnaire in Turkish University Students and Examination of Related Variables.评估手机依恋:土耳其大学生手机依恋问卷的验证及相关变量的考察。
Psychol Rep. 2022 Jun;125(3):1732-1764. doi: 10.1177/00332941211005117. Epub 2021 Mar 27.
6
Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Patient-Rated Tennis Elbow Evaluation Questionnaire on lateral elbow tendinopathy for French-speaking patients.针对说法语患者的外侧肘肌腱病患者自评网球肘评估问卷的跨文化适应与验证。
J Hand Ther. 2016 Oct-Dec;29(4):496-504. doi: 10.1016/j.jht.2016.06.007. Epub 2016 Oct 18.
7
The French version of the HSCL-25 has now been validated for use in primary care.该法语版的 HSCL-25 现在已经过验证,可用于初级保健。
PLoS One. 2019 Apr 4;14(4):e0214804. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0214804. eCollection 2019.
8
Measuring misophonia in youth: A psychometric evaluation of child and parent measures.青少年恐声症的测量:儿童和家长测量工具的心理计量学评估。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Oct 1;338:180-186. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2023.05.093. Epub 2023 May 30.
9
Validation of the French version of the Wisconsin Quality of Life (WISQOL) questionnaire for patients with nephrolithiasis.针对肾结石患者的威斯康星生活质量(WISQOL)问卷法语版的验证。
Can Urol Assoc J. 2021 Apr;15(4):E227-E231. doi: 10.5489/cuaj.6552.
10
[French validation of the Acceptance of Modern Myths about Sexual Aggression scale (AMMSA) and experience of close relationships with students and perpetrators of domestic violence].[《性侵犯现代神话接受量表》(AMMSA)的法语验证以及与学生和家庭暴力施暴者亲密关系的体验]
Encephale. 2021 Dec;47(6):554-563. doi: 10.1016/j.encep.2020.11.010. Epub 2021 Apr 2.

本文引用的文献

1
Can graphic warning labels reduce the consumption of meat?图形警示标签能否减少肉类消费?
Appetite. 2022 Jan 1;168:105690. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2021.105690. Epub 2021 Oct 1.
2
Meat Reduction in 5 to 8 Years Old Children-A Survey to Investigate the Role of Parental Meat Attachment.5至8岁儿童减少肉类摄入——一项调查父母对肉类依恋程度作用的研究
Foods. 2021 Jul 29;10(8):1756. doi: 10.3390/foods10081756.
3
Associations of unprocessed and processed meat intake with mortality and cardiovascular disease in 21 countries [Prospective Urban Rural Epidemiology (PURE) Study]: a prospective cohort study.
食用未加工和加工肉类与 21 个国家的死亡率和心血管疾病的关联:一项前瞻性队列研究[前瞻性城乡流行病学(PURE)研究]。
Am J Clin Nutr. 2021 Sep 1;114(3):1049-1058. doi: 10.1093/ajcn/nqaa448.
4
Multiple health and environmental impacts of foods.食物对健康和环境的多重影响。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 Nov 12;116(46):23357-23362. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1906908116. Epub 2019 Oct 28.
5
Reducing food's environmental impacts through producers and consumers.通过生产者和消费者减少食物对环境的影响。
Science. 2018 Jun 1;360(6392):987-992. doi: 10.1126/science.aaq0216.
6
Gauging attitudes and behaviours: Meat consumption and potential reduction.评估态度和行为:肉类消费和潜在减少。
Appetite. 2018 Aug 1;127:230-241. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.04.015. Epub 2018 May 8.
7
Neutralising the meat paradox: Cognitive dissonance, gender, and eating animals.消解肉食悖论:认知失调、性别与食用动物。
Appetite. 2018 Apr 1;123:280-288. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Jan 4.
8
Carcinogenicity of consumption of red and processed meat.食用红肉和加工肉类的致癌性。
Lancet Oncol. 2015 Dec;16(16):1599-600. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(15)00444-1. Epub 2015 Oct 29.
9
Attached to meat? (Un)Willingness and intentions to adopt a more plant-based diet.与肉类有关?采用更以植物为基础的饮食的(不)意愿和意图。
Appetite. 2015 Dec;95:113-25. doi: 10.1016/j.appet.2015.06.024. Epub 2015 Jul 3.
10
Association between total, processed, red and white meat consumption and all-cause, CVD and IHD mortality: a meta-analysis of cohort studies.总肉类、加工肉类、红肉和白肉消费量与全因死亡率、心血管疾病死亡率和缺血性心脏病死亡率之间的关联:队列研究的荟萃分析
Br J Nutr. 2014 Sep 14;112(5):762-75. doi: 10.1017/S000711451400124X. Epub 2014 Jun 16.