Nardone David A
School of Medicine, Oregon Health & Science University, Portland, OR, USA.
J Gen Intern Med. 2025 Feb;40(2):467-473. doi: 10.1007/s11606-024-09112-y. Epub 2024 Oct 21.
In 1960, Dr. William Dock, visiting professor at Yale, discussed the case of a young girl with an unknown liver disease. Dock recommended biopsy, invoking bank robber Willie Sutton's words "that's where the money is." Drs. Petersdorf and Beeson, in attendance that day, included the following in their 1961 publication on fever of unexplained origin, "We are indebted to Dr. William Dock for the term Sutton's Law. It recommends proceeding immediately to the diagnostic test most likely to provide a diagnosis, and deplores the tendency to carry out a battery of 'routine' examinations in conventional sequence." Thereafter, Sutton's Law became an acclaimed aphorism advocating pursuit of tissue, because of its specificity for achieving diagnostic certainty. However, its popularity was fleeting, as formal medical decision-analysis (FMDA) became the standard. In the 1940s and 1950s, pioneers in the field laid the groundwork, and by the 1980s, clinician researchers had introduced the science into everyday clinical practice. The original version of Sutton's Law neglected the reality that FMDA is more than specificity, tissue, and absolute certainty. The newer version encourages clinicians to employ and prioritize their "routine" interview questions, physical examination assessments, and laboratory tests that provide clarity to differentiate between disease and no disease, to influence favorably the patient's management, and to discard those evaluations more likely to provide misleading results. Dock, Petersdorf, and Beeson may not have spoken the language of FMDA, but they were adept at applying its principles. Without them, and the unknown medical student who made the diagnosis of schistosomiasis, there would be no Sutton's Law. For many, it is an obsolete and apocryphal aphorism valuable solely for touting the importance of specificity in tissue diagnosis. For others, it has evolved, remaining relevant as an authentic lesson in decision-analysis, past and present.
1960年,耶鲁大学客座教授威廉·多克博士讨论了一名患有不明肝脏疾病的年轻女孩的病例。多克建议进行活检,引用了银行劫匪威利·萨顿的话“钱就在那里”。彼得斯多夫博士和比森博士当天也在场,他们在1961年发表的关于不明原因发热的文章中写道:“我们感谢威廉·多克博士提出了萨顿定律。它建议立即进行最有可能得出诊断结果的诊断测试,并谴责按常规顺序进行一系列‘常规’检查的倾向。”此后,萨顿定律成为一条广受赞誉的格言,倡导获取组织样本,因为它对实现诊断确定性具有针对性。然而,随着正式的医学决策分析(FMDA)成为标准,它的流行只是昙花一现。在20世纪40年代和50年代,该领域的先驱者奠定了基础,到了20世纪80年代,临床研究人员将这门科学引入了日常临床实践。萨顿定律的原始版本忽略了一个现实,即FMDA不仅仅涉及特异性、组织样本和绝对确定性。更新后的版本鼓励临床医生运用并优先考虑那些能明确区分疾病与非疾病状态、对患者治疗产生有利影响的“常规”问诊问题、体格检查评估和实验室检查,并摒弃那些更可能产生误导性结果的评估。多克、彼得斯多夫和比森可能没有使用FMDA的术语,但他们善于运用其原则。如果没有他们,以及那个诊断出血吸虫病的不知名医科学生,就不会有萨顿定律。对许多人来说,它是一条过时且虚构的格言,仅在宣扬组织诊断中特异性的重要性方面有价值。对另一些人来说,它已经演变,作为过去和现在决策分析中的真实教训仍然具有现实意义。