• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

经椎弓根斜向螺钉固定的腰椎后路椎间融合术的生物力学特性分析

Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation.

作者信息

Wu Li, Jiang Xiaoxuan, Guan Tianmin, He Zhong, Li Jian

机构信息

Institute of Mechanical Engineering, Dalian Jiaotong University, Dalian, 116028, Liaoning, China.

Nanjing Drum Tower Hospital, the Affiliated Hospital of Nanjing University Medical School, Nanjing, 210009, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Heliyon. 2024 Oct 4;10(19):e38929. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38929. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.

DOI:10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38929
PMID:39435082
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11491909/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

An alternative to conventional posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF) is a PLIF with transpedicular oblique screw fixation system. An assessment of new fixation system's viability and efficacy is conducted through a comparison of its biomechanical properties with those of conventional PLIF.

METHOD

A comprehensive finite element model (FEM) of the lumbar regions L1-L5 was developed and the surgical segment L3-L4 was chosen to comprise the surgical models of both traditional PLIF and new PLIF. In new PLIF model, an analysis was conducted on segmental range of motion (RoM), cage stress, inferior endplates stress, vertebral stress, and internal fixation stress. Three-dimensional printers are utilized to fabricate and assemble the fusion cage and vertebrae, and compression test machines are employed to execute physiological load and extreme load experiments on new PLIF, so as to verify the accuracy of the FEM analysis and the mode of fatigue exhibited by new PLIF.

RESULTS

In new PLIF, the maximum stress on the inferior endplates under physiological loads was reduced in comparison to conventional PLIF. While the maximum stress on the cage, vertebral body, and screw increased, it remained within an acceptable range. The experimental data indicates that new fixation system can endure a vertical load exceeding 2800 N and an ultimate bending moment of 77 Nm.

CONCLUSION

The new PLIF exhibits a comparable RoM to its predecessor, simultaneously mitigating inferior endplate stress and accommodating physiological loads, which reduce the amount of surgical incision and fusion fixation instruments. Consequently, it emerges as a sanguine surgical approach to fuse the degenerative lumbar spine.

摘要

目的

传统后路腰椎椎间融合术(PLIF)的一种替代方法是采用经椎弓根斜向螺钉固定系统的PLIF。通过将新固定系统的生物力学特性与传统PLIF的生物力学特性进行比较,对其可行性和有效性进行评估。

方法

建立了L1-L5腰椎区域的综合有限元模型(FEM),并选择手术节段L3-L4构建传统PLIF和新型PLIF的手术模型。在新型PLIF模型中,对节段活动度(RoM)、椎间融合器应力、下终板应力、椎体应力和内固定应力进行了分析。利用三维打印机制作并组装融合器和椎体,并使用压缩试验机对新型PLIF进行生理负荷和极限负荷实验,以验证有限元分析的准确性以及新型PLIF的疲劳模式。

结果

在新型PLIF中,与传统PLIF相比,生理负荷下下终板的最大应力降低。虽然椎间融合器、椎体和螺钉上的最大应力有所增加,但仍在可接受范围内。实验数据表明,新固定系统能够承受超过2800 N的垂直负荷和77 Nm的极限弯矩。

结论

新型PLIF的活动度与传统PLIF相当,同时减轻了下终板应力并能承受生理负荷,减少了手术切口和融合固定器械的数量。因此,它成为一种治疗退行性腰椎疾病的有前景的手术方法。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/5f78f24b31cc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/a7e13fd2fad8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/9f0a0a21fba8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/6b7af6cd828f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/ecb9dcff7ae7/gr4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/5f78f24b31cc/gr5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/a7e13fd2fad8/gr1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/9f0a0a21fba8/gr2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/6b7af6cd828f/gr3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/ecb9dcff7ae7/gr4a.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/7cf0/11491909/5f78f24b31cc/gr5.jpg

相似文献

1
Biomechanical properties analysis of posterior lumbar interbody fusion with transpedicular oblique screw fixation.经椎弓根斜向螺钉固定的腰椎后路椎间融合术的生物力学特性分析
Heliyon. 2024 Oct 4;10(19):e38929. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e38929. eCollection 2024 Oct 15.
2
Biomechanical comparison of single-level posterior versus transforaminal lumbar interbody fusions with bilateral pedicle screw fixation: segmental stability and the effects on adjacent motion segments.单节段后路与经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术双侧椎弓根螺钉固定的生物力学比较:节段稳定性及对相邻运动节段的影响。
J Neurosurg Spine. 2010 Jun;12(6):700-8. doi: 10.3171/2009.12.SPINE09123.
3
Biomechanical changes of oblique lumbar interbody fusion with different fixation techniques in degenerative spondylolisthesis lumbar spine: a finite element analysis.不同固定技术治疗退变性腰椎滑脱症的斜向腰椎间融合术后生物力学变化:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Aug 24;25(1):664. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07796-1.
4
Computational comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion with various supplementary fixation systems: a finite element analysis.不同附加固定系统前路腰椎间融合术与斜外侧腰椎间融合术的计算比较:有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 2;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03480-z.
5
Biomechanical Evaluation of Lateral Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Various Fixation Options for Adjacent Segment Degeneration: A Finite Element Analysis.不同固定方式下腰椎侧方椎间融合术对相邻节段退变影响的生物力学评估:有限元分析
World Neurosurg. 2023 May;173:e156-e167. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2023.02.023. Epub 2023 Feb 11.
6
Biomechanical advantages of robot-assisted pedicle screw fixation in posterior lumbar interbody fusion compared with freehand technique in a prospective randomized controlled trial-perspective for patient-specific finite element analysis.在一项前瞻性随机对照试验中,与徒手技术相比,机器人辅助椎弓根螺钉固定在后路腰椎椎间融合术中的生物力学优势——基于患者特异性有限元分析的视角
Spine J. 2017 May;17(5):671-680. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2016.11.010. Epub 2016 Nov 17.
7
Biomechanical Evaluation of Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion with Various Fixation Options: A Finite Element Analysis.不同固定方式下斜向腰椎间融合的生物力学评估:有限元分析。
Orthop Surg. 2021 Apr;13(2):517-529. doi: 10.1111/os.12877. Epub 2021 Feb 22.
8
Biomechanical assessment of different transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion constructs in normal and osteoporotic condition: a finite element analysis.不同经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术在正常和骨质疏松状态下的生物力学评估:有限元分析。
Spine J. 2024 Jun;24(6):1121-1131. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2024.01.017. Epub 2024 Feb 3.
9
Finite element analysis of biomechanical investigation on diverse internal fixation techniques in oblique lumbar interbody fusion.不同内固定技术在斜外侧腰椎椎间融合术中生物力学研究的有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2024 Oct 12;25(1):804. doi: 10.1186/s12891-024-07887-z.
10
Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Versus Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: Finite Element Analysis of the Vibration Characteristics of Fused Lumbar Spine.后路腰椎间融合术与经椎间孔腰椎间融合术:融合腰椎的振动特性有限元分析。
World Neurosurg. 2021 Jun;150:e81-e88. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2021.02.094. Epub 2021 Feb 27.

本文引用的文献

1
Contribution of ankle motion pattern during landing to reduce the knee-related injury risk.在落地过程中,踝关节运动模式对降低膝关节相关损伤风险的贡献。
Comput Biol Med. 2024 Sep;180:108965. doi: 10.1016/j.compbiomed.2024.108965. Epub 2024 Jul 30.
2
Biomechanical evaluation of an osteoporotic anatomical 3D printed posterior lumbar interbody fusion cage with internal lattice design based on weighted topology optimization.基于加权拓扑优化的具有内部晶格设计的骨质疏松性解剖型3D打印后腰椎椎间融合器的生物力学评估
Int J Bioprint. 2023 Mar 1;9(3):697. doi: 10.18063/ijb.697. eCollection 2023.
3
Biomechanical Analysis of Double-Level Oblique Lumbar Fusion with Different Types of Fixation: A Finite Element-Based Study.
基于有限元分析的不同固定方式下双层斜向腰椎融合术的生物力学研究。
Orthop Surg. 2023 May;15(5):1357-1365. doi: 10.1111/os.13703. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
4
A systematic review of anterior lumbar interbody fusion (ALIF) versus posterior lumbar interbody fusion (PLIF), transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF), posterolateral lumbar fusion (PLF).前路腰椎间融合术(ALIF)与后路腰椎间融合术(PLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎间融合术(TLIF)、经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术(PLF)的系统评价。
Eur Spine J. 2023 Jun;32(6):1911-1926. doi: 10.1007/s00586-023-07567-x. Epub 2023 Apr 18.
5
Hybrid pedicle screw and modified cortical bone trajectory technique in transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at L4-L5 segment: finite element analysis.L4-L5 节段经椎间孔腰椎体间融合术中的杂交椎弓根螺钉和改良皮质骨轨道技术:有限元分析。
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2023 Apr 13;24(1):288. doi: 10.1186/s12891-023-06385-y.
6
Biomechanical Evaluation of Rigid Interspinous Process Fixation Combined With Lumbar Interbody Fusion Using Hybrid Testing Protocol.使用混合测试方案对刚性棘突间固定联合腰椎椎间融合进行生物力学评估。
J Biomech Eng. 2023 Jun 1;145(6). doi: 10.1115/1.4056768.
7
Computational comparison of anterior lumbar interbody fusion and oblique lumbar interbody fusion with various supplementary fixation systems: a finite element analysis.不同附加固定系统前路腰椎间融合术与斜外侧腰椎间融合术的计算比较:有限元分析。
J Orthop Surg Res. 2023 Jan 2;18(1):4. doi: 10.1186/s13018-022-03480-z.
8
Prediction of complications and fusion outcomes of fused lumbar spine with or without fixation system under whole-body vibration.全身振动下融合固定系统与非融合固定系统治疗腰椎融合术的并发症及融合效果预测
Med Biol Eng Comput. 2021 Jun;59(6):1223-1233. doi: 10.1007/s11517-021-02375-1. Epub 2021 Jun 2.
9
Biomechanical analysis of lumbar interbody fusion supplemented with various posterior stabilization systems.后路不同固定系统辅助下腰椎间融合的生物力学分析。
Eur Spine J. 2021 Aug;30(8):2342-2350. doi: 10.1007/s00586-021-06856-7. Epub 2021 May 4.
10
Biomechanical Comparison of Stand-Alone and Bilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion Surgery-A Finite Element Analysis.独立式与双侧椎弓根螺钉固定在斜向腰椎间融合术中的生物力学比较——有限元分析。
World Neurosurg. 2020 Sep;141:e204-e212. doi: 10.1016/j.wneu.2020.05.245. Epub 2020 Jun 2.