• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

科威特卫生环境影响与实施的混合成像研究中CT的3年全国剂量参考水平

A 3-year national DRL for CT in hybrid imaging study in Kuwait health environment-impact and implementation.

作者信息

Masoomi Michael, Al-Kandari Latifah, Al-Shammeri Iman, Elrahman Hany, Al-Shammeri Jehan

机构信息

Department of Nuclear Medicine and Molecular Imaging, Adan Hospital, MOH, Hadiya, 46020, Kuwait.

Research and Innovation Department, Portsmouth University Hospital, Portsmouth, United Kingdom.

出版信息

BJR Open. 2024 Oct 4;6(1):tzae032. doi: 10.1093/bjro/tzae032. eCollection 2024 Jan.

DOI:10.1093/bjro/tzae032
PMID:39440070
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11495866/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) for CT in PET-CT are limited, and published DRLs from other countries may not be directly applicable to the State of Kuwait (KW). The authors aimed to carry out the final phase of a 3-year study on DRLs in KW, supporting optimization and dose reduction as imaging technology advances.

METHODS

In this cohort study, 400 adult oncology patients from 8 PET-CT centres were included, following the same procedures as in the first (2018) and second (2020) years, in accordance with the MOH-KW Ethical Committee's recommendations. The CT dose index (CTDIvol), dose-length product (DLP), and scan length were recorded, and the median, mean, standard deviation, as well as the 75th and 25th percentiles, along with the whole-body (WB) effective dose (ED), were calculated. Comparative studies were conducted to track implementation and identify any shortfalls.

RESULTS

In this study, half-body (HB) and WB scans accounted for 66% and 34% of the total 400 cases, respectively. The proposed local DRL practice among the 8 centres in the 2022 study exhibited a maximum variation of 25%, showing a 30% improvement over 2020. The achievable local DRL remained consistent with 2020 levels. Comparative results of the third quartile DLP (476 mGy cm) and CTDIvol (4 mGy) values for 2022 indicated lower values for the third phase (400 entries) compared to 2020, with a 1.5-fold variation in DLP. The calculated ED for WB scans ranged from 2.6 to 7.1 mSv, with mean values of 4.7 ± 1.25 mSv, using a conversion factor ( = 0.0093 mSv/mGy/cm). The 2022 proposed national diagnostic reference levels (NDRLs) for HB (469 mGy cm, 4.0 mGy) were lower than the Swiss National Data (620 mGy cm, 6.0 mGy) and France (628 mGy cm, 6.6 mGy), but slightly higher than those of the United Kingdom (400 mGy cm, 4.3 mGy), despite the Swiss having about 5000 entries, France 1000 entries, and the United Kingdom 370 HB entries.

CONCLUSIONS

There was a 11.1% continuous improvement in NDRL for 2022 compared to 9.1% in 2020 and 13% in 2018, demonstrating a trend of enhanced optimization.

ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE

The data established a trend of NDRL for WBCT (PET-CT) that can serve as a national databank for ongoing optimization. This promotes improvements in patient protection and quality care within the clinical environment of the State of Kuwait, aligning with the strategic goals of Kuwait Vision-2035.

摘要

目的

正电子发射断层显像-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)中CT的诊断参考水平(DRLs)有限,其他国家公布的DRLs可能不适用于科威特国(KW)。作者旨在开展一项为期3年的科威特DRLs研究的最后阶段,随着成像技术的进步,支持优化和降低剂量。

方法

在这项队列研究中,按照科威特卫生部伦理委员会的建议,纳入了来自8个PET-CT中心的400名成年肿瘤患者,采用与第一年(2018年)和第二年(2020年)相同的程序。记录CT剂量指数(CTDIvol)、剂量长度乘积(DLP)和扫描长度,并计算中位数、均值、标准差以及第75和第25百分位数,以及全身(WB)有效剂量(ED)。进行比较研究以跟踪实施情况并发现任何不足之处。

结果

在本研究中,半身(HB)和WB扫描分别占400例总数的66%和34%。2022年研究中8个中心提出的当地DRL实践显示最大差异为25%,比2020年提高了30%。可实现的当地DRL与2020年水平保持一致。2022年第三四分位数DLP(476 mGy cm)和CTDIvol(4 mGy)值的比较结果表明,与2020年相比,第三阶段(400份记录)的值更低,DLP有1.5倍的差异。使用转换因子(=0.0093 mSv/mGy/cm)计算的WB扫描ED范围为2.6至7.1 mSv,平均值为4.7±1.25 mSv。2022年提出的科威特国HB的国家诊断参考水平(NDRLs)(469 mGy cm, 4.0 mGy)低于瑞士国家数据(620 mGy cm, 6.0 mGy)和法国(628 mGy cm, 6.6 mGy),但略高于英国(4

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/fbd789a433d6/tzae032f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/c181baf5b242/tzae032f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/5e307c2f9626/tzae032f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/055cce5cc16d/tzae032f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/b550cca6aa71/tzae032f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/8e996a860581/tzae032f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/9d0be177eff6/tzae032f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/fbd789a433d6/tzae032f7.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/c181baf5b242/tzae032f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/5e307c2f9626/tzae032f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/055cce5cc16d/tzae032f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/b550cca6aa71/tzae032f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/8e996a860581/tzae032f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/9d0be177eff6/tzae032f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/8bd0/11495866/fbd789a433d6/tzae032f7.jpg

相似文献

1
A 3-year national DRL for CT in hybrid imaging study in Kuwait health environment-impact and implementation.科威特卫生环境影响与实施的混合成像研究中CT的3年全国剂量参考水平
BJR Open. 2024 Oct 4;6(1):tzae032. doi: 10.1093/bjro/tzae032. eCollection 2024 Jan.
2
National Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) for nuclear medicine computed tomography-positron emission tomography hybrid imaging studies for kuwait population: second phase dose audit-2019.科威特人群核医学计算机断层扫描-正电子发射断层扫描混合成像研究的国家诊断参考水平(DRL):2019年第二阶段剂量审核
BJR Open. 2021 Nov 24;3(1):20210020. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20210020. eCollection 2021.
3
National and local diagnostic reference levels for adultF-FDG and CT in Jordanian PET/CT: findings and implications in practice.约旦成人 F-FDG 和 CT 的全国和地方诊断参考水平:实践中的发现和意义。
J Radiol Prot. 2024 Mar 7;44(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad2c62.
4
A systematic review and meta-analysis on the radiation dose of computed tomography in hybrid nuclear medicine imaging.关于混合核医学成像中计算机断层扫描辐射剂量的系统评价和荟萃分析。
EJNMMI Phys. 2023 May 25;10(1):32. doi: 10.1186/s40658-023-00553-8.
5
ESTIMATION OF DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS AND ACHIEVABLE DOSES FOR PEDIATRIC PATIENTS IN COMMON COMPUTED TOMOGRAPHY EXAMINATIONS: A MULTI-CENTER STUDY.估算常见计算机断层扫描检查中儿科患者的诊断参考水平和可达到剂量:一项多中心研究。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2021 Aug 2;194(4):214-222. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncab093.
6
Diagnostic reference levels for F-FDG whole body PET/CT procedures: Results from a survey of 12 centres in Australia and New Zealand.¹⁸F-FDG全身PET/CT检查的诊断参考水平:澳大利亚和新西兰12个中心的调查结果
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2019 Jun;63(3):291-299. doi: 10.1111/1754-9485.12857. Epub 2019 Feb 15.
7
An Australian local diagnostic reference level for paediatric whole-body F-FDG PET/CT.澳大利亚儿童全身氟代脱氧葡萄糖正电子发射断层显像/计算机断层扫描(F-FDG PET/CT)的本地诊断参考水平
Br J Radiol. 2019 Apr;92(1096):20180879. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20180879. Epub 2019 Mar 5.
8
Radiation exposure and establishment of diagnostic reference levels of whole-body low-dose CT for the assessment of multiple myeloma with second- and third-generation dual-source CT.辐射剂量与第二代和第三代双源 CT 全身低剂量 CT 诊断参考水平在多发性骨髓瘤评估中的建立。
Acta Radiol. 2022 Apr;63(4):527-535. doi: 10.1177/02841851211003287. Epub 2021 Mar 20.
9
Adult Computed Tomography examinations in Uganda: Towards determining the National Diagnostic Reference Levels.乌干达成人计算机断层扫描检查:确定国家诊断参考水平。
BMC Med Imaging. 2022 Jun 11;22(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12880-022-00838-x.
10
Establishment of local diagnostic reference levels for CT colonography at a tertiary hospital.在一家三级医院建立CT结肠成像的本地诊断参考水平。
SA J Radiol. 2024 Jan 31;28(1):2809. doi: 10.4102/sajr.v28i1.2809. eCollection 2024.

本文引用的文献

1
National and local diagnostic reference levels for adultF-FDG and CT in Jordanian PET/CT: findings and implications in practice.约旦成人 F-FDG 和 CT 的全国和地方诊断参考水平:实践中的发现和意义。
J Radiol Prot. 2024 Mar 7;44(1). doi: 10.1088/1361-6498/ad2c62.
2
National Diagnostic Reference Level (DRL) for nuclear medicine computed tomography-positron emission tomography hybrid imaging studies for kuwait population: second phase dose audit-2019.科威特人群核医学计算机断层扫描-正电子发射断层扫描混合成像研究的国家诊断参考水平(DRL):2019年第二阶段剂量审核
BJR Open. 2021 Nov 24;3(1):20210020. doi: 10.1259/bjro.20210020. eCollection 2021.
3
TOWARD NATIONAL CT DIAGNOSTIC REFERENCE LEVELS IN THE UNITED ARAB EMIRATES: A MULTICENTER REVIEW OF CT DOSE INDEX AND DOSE LENGTH PRODUCT.
迈向阿联酋全国 CT 诊断参考水平:一项关于 CT 剂量指数和剂量长度乘积的多中心回顾。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2020 Sep 16;190(3):243-249. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncaa100.
4
Swiss survey on hybrid imaging CTs doses in Nuclear Medicine and proposed national dose reference levels.瑞士关于核医学中混合成像CT剂量的调查及提议的国家剂量参考水平。
Z Med Phys. 2018 Dec;28(4):265-275. doi: 10.1016/j.zemedi.2018.01.005. Epub 2018 Feb 17.
5
ICRP Publication 135: Diagnostic Reference Levels in Medical Imaging.国际放射防护委员会第135号出版物:医学成像中的诊断参考水平
Ann ICRP. 2017 Oct;46(1):1-144. doi: 10.1177/0146645317717209.
6
A national survey of computed tomography doses in hybrid PET-CT and SPECT-CT examinations in the UK.英国对混合正电子发射断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(PET-CT)和单光子发射计算机断层扫描-计算机断层扫描(SPECT-CT)检查中计算机断层扫描剂量的全国性调查。
Nucl Med Commun. 2017 Jun;38(6):459-470. doi: 10.1097/MNM.0000000000000672.
7
Diagnostic Reference Levels of CT Radiation Dose in Whole-Body PET/CT.全身PET/CT中CT辐射剂量的诊断参考水平
J Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;57(2):238-41. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.115.160465. Epub 2015 Nov 12.
8
Updated estimates of typical effective doses for common CT examinations in the UK following the 2011 national review.2011年英国全国审查后英国常见CT检查典型有效剂量的最新估计值。
Br J Radiol. 2016;89(1057):20150346. doi: 10.1259/bjr.20150346. Epub 2015 Nov 6.
9
National survey of patient doses from whole-body FDG PET-CT examinations in France in 2011.2011年法国全身FDG PET-CT检查患者剂量的全国性调查。
Radiat Prot Dosimetry. 2012 Dec;152(4):334-8. doi: 10.1093/rpd/ncs066. Epub 2012 May 14.
10
Diagnostic reference levels from the ACR CT Accreditation Program.来自 ACR CT 认证计划的诊断参考水平。
J Am Coll Radiol. 2011 Nov;8(11):795-803. doi: 10.1016/j.jacr.2011.03.014.