Wang Xin, Wang Xinran, Edland Steven D, Broce Iris J, Dale Anders M, Banks Sarah J
Department of Neuroscience, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Division of Biostatistics, Herbert Wertheim School of Public Health and Human Longevity Science, University of California San Diego, La Jolla, California, USA.
Alzheimers Dement. 2024 Dec;20(12):8484-8502. doi: 10.1002/alz.14284. Epub 2024 Oct 23.
Identifying low-cost, minimally-invasive screening instruments for Alzheimer's disease (AD) trial enrichment will improve the efficiency of AD trials.
A total of 685 cognitively normal (CN) individuals and individuals with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from the Alzheimer's Disease Neuroimaging Initiative (ADNI) were grouped according to cutoffs of genetic risk factor (G) polygenic hazard score (PHS) and tau pathology (T) plasma phosphorylated tau-181 (p-tau181) into four groups: G+T+, G-T-, G+T-, and G-T+. We assessed the associations between group level and longitudinal cognitive decline and AD conversion. Power analyses compared the estimated sample size required to detect differences in cognitive decline.
The G+T+ group was associated with faster cognitive decline and higher AD risk. Clinical trials enrolling G+T+ participants would benefit from significantly reduced sample sizes compared with similar trials using only single makers as an inclusion criterion.
The combination of two low-cost, minimally-invasive measures-genetics and plasma biomarkers-would be a promising screening procedure for clinical trial enrollment.
Participants with unimpaired or mildly impaired cognition were grouped based on cutoffs on genetic risk factors (G: polygenic hazardous score [PHS]) and Alzheimer's pathology (T: baseline plasma phosphorylated tau-181 [p-tau181]). Participants with high PHSs and plasma p-tau181 levels (G+T+) were at risk of faster cognitive decline and AD progression. The combination of PHS and plasma p-tau181 could enhance clinical trial enrichment more effectively than using single biomarkers.
识别用于阿尔茨海默病(AD)试验富集的低成本、微创筛查工具将提高AD试验的效率。
来自阿尔茨海默病神经影像学倡议(ADNI)的685名认知正常(CN)个体和轻度认知障碍(MCI)个体根据遗传风险因素(G)多基因风险评分(PHS)和tau病理(T)血浆磷酸化tau-181(p-tau181)的临界值分为四组:G+T+、G-T-、G+T-和G-T+。我们评估了组水平与纵向认知衰退和AD转化之间的关联。功效分析比较了检测认知衰退差异所需的估计样本量。
G+T+组与更快的认知衰退和更高的AD风险相关。与仅使用单一标志物作为纳入标准的类似试验相比,纳入G+T+参与者的临床试验将受益于显著减少的样本量。
两种低成本、微创测量方法——遗传学和血浆生物标志物——的组合将是一种有前景的临床试验入组筛查程序。
认知未受损或轻度受损的参与者根据遗传风险因素(G:多基因风险评分[PHS])和阿尔茨海默病病理(T:基线血浆磷酸化tau-181[p-tau181])的临界值进行分组。PHS高和血浆p-tau181水平高的参与者(G+T+)有更快的认知衰退和AD进展风险。与使用单一生物标志物相比,PHS和血浆p-tau181的组合可以更有效地增强临床试验富集。