Yuksek Ihtisas University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical History and Ethics, Ankara, Türkiye.
Inonu University Faculty of Medicine, Department of Medical History and Ethics, Malatya, Türkiye.
PLoS One. 2024 Oct 24;19(10):e0311184. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0311184. eCollection 2024.
Unexpected, sudden, and tragic losses can prompt us to reflect on the concept of a "good death." The earthquake disaster that struck our country in 2023 vividly demonstrated the challenging impact of such events, which can turn lives upside down and compel us to question the notion of a "good death." This study aims to determine the perceptions of a "good death" and the levels of trauma experienced by physicians and nurses who directly witnessed the earthquake disaster, and to understand the relationship between these factors.
This cross-sectional study was conducted between October 1 and December 31, 2023, using phone interviews facilitated by a web-based Google form. Data were collected from 560 healthcare professionals (280 nurses and 280 doctors) working in hospitals located in Kahramanmaraş, Hatay, Malatya, and Adıyaman provinces in Türkiye, which were directly impacted by the earthquake of February 6, 2023, and who consented to participate in the study. Trauma levels were assessed using the "Post-Earthquake Trauma Level Determination Scale," and perceptions of a good death were evaluated using the "Good Death Scale (GDS)." Data were analyzed using SPSS 25 and AMOS 24 software. Normal distribution was checked with the Kolmogorov-Smirnov Test. Independent t-tests were used to compare independent binary groups, Pearson correlation analysis was used to examine the relationship between scale scores, and Cronbach's α coefficient was used to evaluate the reliability of the scales (Good Death Scale: 0.931; Trauma Scale: 0.957). Structural equation modeling and multi-group analysis were conducted to examine the relationship between scale scores according to the profession variable.
The mean score for the perception of a good death was found to be 52.76 ± 8.77 for physicians and 55.84 ± 9.63 for nurses. A statistically significant difference was detected between physicians and nurses in the "psychosocial spirituality," "personal control," and "clinical" sub-dimensions of the scale (p<0.05). The mean trauma scores were 56.81 ± 17.58 for physicians and 64.82 ± 18.56 for nurses. A significant difference was found in the trauma scale and its sub-dimensions ("excitement limitation," "emotional," "cognitive restructuring," "sleep problems") (p<0.05). It was observed that higher trauma levels positively influenced good death perception scores.
This study reveals that healthcare workers are deeply affected psychologically by major disasters, with high levels of trauma. A significant relationship was found between trauma levels and perceptions of a good death. These findings provide an important basis for future research to understand how trauma shapes the lives and job performance of healthcare workers in the long term.
突如其来的意外和悲剧性的损失会促使我们反思“善终”的概念。2023 年我国发生的地震灾害生动地展示了此类事件的挑战性影响,它可能会颠覆人们的生活,并促使我们质疑“善终”的概念。本研究旨在确定直接目睹地震灾害的医生和护士对“善终”的看法以及所经历的创伤程度,并了解这些因素之间的关系。
这是一项横断面研究,于 2023 年 10 月 1 日至 12 月 31 日期间进行,使用基于网络的 Google 表格通过电话访谈进行。数据来自土耳其哈塔伊、马拉蒂亚和阿德亚曼省以及卡赫拉曼马拉什省的 560 名在直接受 2023 年 2 月 6 日地震影响的医院工作的医护人员(280 名护士和 280 名医生),他们同意参与研究。创伤程度使用“地震后创伤程度确定量表”进行评估,对“善终”的看法使用“善终量表(GDS)”进行评估。使用 SPSS 25 和 AMOS 24 软件进行数据分析。使用 Kolmogorov-Smirnov 检验检查正态分布。使用独立样本 t 检验比较独立的二进制组,使用 Pearson 相关分析检查量表得分之间的关系,使用 Cronbach's α 系数评估量表的信度(善终量表:0.931;创伤量表:0.957)。根据职业变量进行结构方程建模和多组分析,以检查量表得分之间的关系。
医生对善终的看法平均得分为 52.76 ± 8.77,护士的平均得分为 55.84 ± 9.63。医生和护士在量表的“心理社会精神”、“个人控制”和“临床”分量表上的得分存在统计学差异(p<0.05)。医生的创伤平均得分为 56.81 ± 17.58,护士的创伤平均得分为 64.82 ± 18.56。在创伤量表及其分量表(“兴奋限制”、“情绪”、“认知重构”、“睡眠问题”)上发现显著差异(p<0.05)。较高的创伤水平对善终的看法得分有积极影响。
本研究表明,重大灾害对医护人员的心理影响深远,创伤程度较高。创伤水平与对善终的看法之间存在显著关系。这些发现为未来的研究提供了重要依据,以了解创伤如何长期影响医护人员的生活和工作表现。