• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估一种新型光分离置换系统:与两种现有系统在细胞产量和采集效率方面的比较。

Evaluating a New Photopheresis System: A Comparison with Two Established Systems on Cell Yield and Collection Efficiency.

作者信息

Kartal Orkan, Laner-Plamberger Sandra, Rohde Eva, Mrazek Cornelia, Lauth Wanda, Grabmer Christoph

机构信息

Department for Transfusion Medicine, University Hospital of Salzburg, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Muellner Hauptstraße 48, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

GMP Laboratory, Paracelsus Medical University Salzburg, Strubergasse 21, 5020 Salzburg, Austria.

出版信息

Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 15;14(20):2290. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202290.

DOI:10.3390/diagnostics14202290
PMID:39451613
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11506610/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

: Extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) is a well-established and efficacious cell therapy for a range of diseases. The objective of this retrospective study was to compare the new Amicus Blue inline system with the Therakos Cellex inline system and the Spectra Optia offline system in terms of collection efficiency, mononuclear cell (MNC) yield of mononuclear cell products (MCPs), processing time and correlation between MCP cell count and peripheral blood count of patients.

METHODS

This retrospective study compared 127 procedures utilizing the Spectra Optia offline system, 93 procedures employing the Amicus Blue inline system, and 81 procedures applying the Therakos Cellex inline system. The MNCs were subjected to flow cytometry analysis for CD45 and CD14 expression in order to ascertain the precise composition of the collected lymphocyte and monocyte fractions.

RESULTS

The Therakos inline system demonstrated the highest MNC collection efficiency (Therakos: 74.42 ± 1.82; Optia: 65.79 ± 1.48; Amicus: 56.32 ± 2.80; < 0.01). Regarding the content of collected MNCs (×10⁶/kg body weight), the Spectra Optia offline system was superior to the other systems (Optia: 42.69 ± 1.42; Therakos: 31.21 ± 1.66; Amicus: 27.56 ± 1.54; < 0.01).

CONCLUSIONS

This study represents the first direct comparison of the new Amicus Blue inline system with the two most commonly used ECP systems in the same patient cohort of a single center. The data show that the Amicus Blue inline system collects sufficient MNCs to perform an ECP, but it has a significantly lower CE than the other systems and a significantly lower amount of collected MNCs than the Spectra Optia offline system.

摘要

未标记

体外光化学疗法(ECP)是一种针对多种疾病的成熟且有效的细胞疗法。本回顾性研究的目的是在采集效率、单核细胞产品(MCP)的单核细胞(MNC)产量、处理时间以及MCP细胞计数与患者外周血计数之间的相关性方面,将新型Amicus Blue在线系统与Therakos Cellex在线系统和Spectra Optia离线系统进行比较。

方法

本回顾性研究比较了127例使用Spectra Optia离线系统的操作、93例采用Amicus Blue在线系统的操作以及81例应用Therakos Cellex在线系统的操作。对MNC进行流式细胞术分析,以确定所采集淋巴细胞和单核细胞组分的精确组成。

结果

Therakos在线系统显示出最高的MNC采集效率(Therakos:74.42±1.82;Optia:65.79±1.48;Amicus:56.32±2.80;<0.01)。关于所采集MNC的含量(×10⁶/kg体重),Spectra Optia离线系统优于其他系统(Optia:42.69±1.42;Therakos:31.21±1.66;Amicus:27.56±1.54;<0.01)。

结论

本研究是在单一中心的同一患者队列中,首次对新型Amicus Blue在线系统与两种最常用的ECP系统进行直接比较。数据表明,Amicus Blue在线系统能够采集到足够的MNC来进行ECP,但与其他系统相比,其采集效率显著较低,且所采集的MNC数量比Spectra Optia离线系统显著更少。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd7/11506610/85493b1b39de/diagnostics-14-02290-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd7/11506610/a30a679a9be8/diagnostics-14-02290-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd7/11506610/85493b1b39de/diagnostics-14-02290-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd7/11506610/a30a679a9be8/diagnostics-14-02290-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/2bd7/11506610/85493b1b39de/diagnostics-14-02290-g002.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluating a New Photopheresis System: A Comparison with Two Established Systems on Cell Yield and Collection Efficiency.评估一种新型光分离置换系统:与两种现有系统在细胞产量和采集效率方面的比较。
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Oct 15;14(20):2290. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14202290.
2
Collection efficiency of mononuclear cells in offline extracorporeal photopheresis: can processing time be shortened?离线式光化学疗法中单核细胞的采集效率:能否缩短处理时间?
Blood Transfus. 2024 Mar;22(2):150-156. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.442. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
3
Inline and offline extracorporeal photopheresis: Device performance, cell yields and clinical response.在线和离线体外光分离术:设备性能、细胞产量和临床反应。
J Clin Apher. 2021 Feb;36(1):118-126. doi: 10.1002/jca.21851. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
4
A paired trial comparing mononuclear cell collection in two machines for further inactivation through an inline or offline extracorporeal photopheresis procedure.一项配对试验,比较两台机器采集单核细胞后通过在线或离线体外光化学疗法进行进一步灭活的情况。
Transfusion. 2019 Jan;59(1):340-346. doi: 10.1111/trf.14975. Epub 2018 Oct 4.
5
Technical comparison of four different extracorporeal photopheresis systems.四种不同体外光化学疗法系统的技术比较
Transfusion. 2016 Oct;56(10):2510-2519. doi: 10.1111/trf.13728. Epub 2016 Jul 26.
6
Does Offline Beat Inline Treatment: Investigation into Extracorporeal Photopheresis.离线治疗是否优于在线治疗:体外光化学疗法的研究
Transfus Med Hemother. 2020 Jun;47(3):198-204. doi: 10.1159/000506750. Epub 2020 Mar 27.
7
Inline extracorporeal photopheresis: evaluation of cell collection efficiency.在线细胞光分离术:细胞采集效率评估。
Transfusion. 2019 Dec;59(12):3714-3720. doi: 10.1111/trf.15570. Epub 2019 Nov 4.
8
Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photopheresis by using the "off-line" system: A comparative study between COBE Spectra and Spectra Optia devices.使用“离线”系统进行体外光化学疗法的单核细胞采集:COBE Spectra与Spectra Optia设备的比较研究。
J Clin Apher. 2019 Aug;34(4):359-366. doi: 10.1002/jca.21679. Epub 2018 Dec 14.
9
Mononuclear cell collection for extracorporeal photochemotherapy: a study comparing an automatic and a semiautomatic apheresis device.体外光化学疗法用单核细胞采集:自动与半自动血细胞分离仪的比较研究。
Transfusion. 2013 Sep;53(9):2027-33. doi: 10.1111/trf.12065. Epub 2013 Jan 10.
10
First comparative evaluation of a new leukapheresis technology in non-cytokine-stimulated donors.首次对非细胞因子刺激供体中的新型白细胞分离技术进行比较评估。
Vox Sang. 2014 Apr;106(3):248-55. doi: 10.1111/vox.12102. Epub 2013 Oct 24.

本文引用的文献

1
Collection efficiency of mononuclear cells in offline extracorporeal photopheresis: can processing time be shortened?离线式光化学疗法中单核细胞的采集效率:能否缩短处理时间?
Blood Transfus. 2024 Mar;22(2):150-156. doi: 10.2450/BloodTransfus.442. Epub 2023 Jul 14.
2
Guidelines on the Use of Therapeutic Apheresis in Clinical Practice - Evidence-Based Approach from the Writing Committee of the American Society for Apheresis: The Ninth Special Issue.临床实践中治疗性血液成分去除的应用指南-来自美国体外治疗协会写作委员会的循证方法:第九个特刊。
J Clin Apher. 2023 Apr;38(2):77-278. doi: 10.1002/jca.22043.
3
Comparison of procedure times and collection efficiencies using integrated and multistep nonintegrated procedures for extracorporeal photopheresis.
比较使用一体化和非一体化多步骤程序进行体外光化学疗法的程序时间和采集效率。
J Clin Apher. 2022 Aug;37(4):332-339. doi: 10.1002/jca.21974. Epub 2022 Feb 28.
4
In situ off-line extracorporeal photopheresis conducted in a real-life situation at a Hemobiotherapy Department in France: A comparison of costs vs on-line procedure.在法国的 Hemobiotherapy 部门进行的现场离线体外光分离术:成本与在线程序比较。
J Clin Apher. 2022 Feb;37(1):25-30. doi: 10.1002/jca.21947. Epub 2021 Nov 2.
5
Cost comparison of extracorporeal photopheresis technologies at the European Institute of Oncology.欧洲肿瘤研究所的体外光分离术技术成本比较。
J Clin Apher. 2021 Jun;36(3):364-369. doi: 10.1002/jca.21870. Epub 2021 Jan 21.
6
Inline and offline extracorporeal photopheresis: Device performance, cell yields and clinical response.在线和离线体外光分离术:设备性能、细胞产量和临床反应。
J Clin Apher. 2021 Feb;36(1):118-126. doi: 10.1002/jca.21851. Epub 2020 Oct 15.
7
European dermatology forum - updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - part 1.欧洲皮肤病学论坛——2020年体外光化学疗法使用的更新指南——第1部分
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2020 Dec;34(12):2693-2716. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16890. Epub 2020 Oct 6.
8
European dermatology forum: Updated guidelines on the use of extracorporeal photopheresis 2020 - Part 2.欧洲皮肤病学论坛:2020年体外光化学疗法使用的更新指南 - 第2部分
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol. 2021 Jan;35(1):27-49. doi: 10.1111/jdv.16889. Epub 2020 Sep 22.
9
Pilot study of a new online extracorporeal photopheresis system in patients with steroid refractory or dependent chronic graft vs host disease.新的在线体外光分离术系统治疗激素难治或依赖的慢性移植物抗宿主病的初步研究。
J Clin Apher. 2020 Aug;35(4):342-350. doi: 10.1002/jca.21804. Epub 2020 Jul 8.
10
Inline extracorporeal photopheresis: evaluation of cell collection efficiency.在线细胞光分离术:细胞采集效率评估。
Transfusion. 2019 Dec;59(12):3714-3720. doi: 10.1111/trf.15570. Epub 2019 Nov 4.