Department of Medical Physics and Informatics, University of Szeged, 9 Korányi Fasor, Szeged, 6720, Hungary.
Department of Anaesthesiology and Intensive Therapy, University of Szeged, 6 Semmelweis Str., Szeged, 6725, Hungary.
Sci Rep. 2024 Oct 26;14(1):25443. doi: 10.1038/s41598-024-75808-0.
Capnography, routinely used in operating rooms and intensive care units, reveals essential information on lung ventilation and ventilation-perfusion matching. Mainstream capnography directly measures CO in the breathing circuit for accurate analysis and is considered a reference technique. Sidestream capnography, however, analyzes gas away from the patient leading to potentially less accurate measures. While these methodological differences impact the capnogram indices in mechanically ventilated patients, such assessments during spontaneous breathing are essentially lacking. Accordingly, we aimed to compare mainstream and sidestream capnography in spontaneously breathing subjects, focusing on differences in capnogram shape and dead space indices at various respiratory rates. Simultaneous mainstream and sidestream time and volumetric capnography were performed on spontaneously breathing adults (n = 35). Measurements were performed during controlled low (10/min), medium (12/min), and high (20/min) breathing rates as a challenge. Correlation and Bland-Altman analyses were used to assess trends and agreements between time and volumetric capnography indices obtained by the mainstream and sidestream techniques, including end-tidal CO (ETCO), shape factors reflecting the slopes of phases 2 and 3, and anatomical and physiological dead space fractions. ETCO and physiological dead space measured by mainstream and sidestream techniques showed excellent correlations (r > 0.90, p < 0.001 for all breathing rates) and agreements. While strong correlations and moderate agreements were evidenced in the parameters reflecting the late phase of expiration (phase 3 slope and exhaled CO volume), these relationships were weaker for indices related to the early phase of expiration (phase 2 slope, anatomical dead space). Changing breathing frequency caused significant alterations in all capnography parameters, which were detectable by both mainstream and sidestream techniques. Sidestream capnography cannot substitute the more accurate mainstream technique for measuring the absolute values of shape factors and ventilation dead space fractions. However, sidestream capnography is also able to detect and track changes in uneven alveolar emptying, ventilation-perfusion matching and ventilation dead space fraction in spontaneously breathing subjects.
二氧化碳描记法,在手术室和重症监护病房中常规使用,可揭示肺通气和通气-灌注匹配的重要信息。主流二氧化碳描记法直接测量呼吸回路中的 CO,以进行准确分析,被认为是一种参考技术。然而,支流二氧化碳描记法分析远离患者的气体,导致测量结果可能不够准确。虽然这些方法学差异会影响机械通气患者的二氧化碳描记图指数,但在自主呼吸期间,这种评估基本上是缺乏的。因此,我们旨在比较自主呼吸患者的主流和支流二氧化碳描记法,重点关注不同呼吸频率下二氧化碳描记图形状和死腔指数的差异。对 35 名自主呼吸的成年人同时进行主流和支流时间和容积二氧化碳描记法测量。在受控低(10/min)、中(12/min)和高(20/min)呼吸频率下进行测量,作为挑战。使用相关和 Bland-Altman 分析来评估主流和支流技术获得的时间和容积二氧化碳描记图指数之间的趋势和一致性,包括呼气末 CO(ETCO)、反映相 2 和相 3 斜率的形状因子,以及解剖学和生理学死腔分数。主流和支流技术测量的 ETCO 和生理学死腔具有极好的相关性(所有呼吸频率的 r>0.90,p<0.001)和一致性。虽然在反映呼气末晚期的参数(相 3 斜率和呼出 CO 量)中表现出强相关性和中度一致性,但这些关系在与呼气早期相关的指数(相 2 斜率、解剖学死腔)中较弱。改变呼吸频率会导致所有二氧化碳描记图参数发生显著变化,这两种技术都可以检测到。支流二氧化碳描记法不能替代更准确的主流技术来测量形状因子和通气死腔分数的绝对值。然而,支流二氧化碳描记法也能够检测和跟踪自主呼吸患者肺泡排空不均匀、通气-灌注匹配和通气死腔分数的变化。