• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

审视技术创新、公司绩效和职业安全健康之间的复杂交互关系:混合方法研究。

Examining the Complex Interaction Among Technological Innovation, Company Performance, and Occupational Safety and Health: A Mixed-Methods Study.

机构信息

Department of Management, Economics and Industrial Engineering, Politecnico di Milano, 20133 Milan, Italy.

Department of Juridical and Economic Studies, Sapienza Università di Roma, 00185 Roma, Italy.

出版信息

Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 16;21(10):1368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101368.

DOI:10.3390/ijerph21101368
PMID:39457341
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11506840/
Abstract

Technological innovation and Industry 5.0 are gaining increasing attention among researchers as they offer companies a significant competitive advantage. On the other hand, introducing these technologies also brings new risks for workers. The current literature reveals a lack of studies that effectively integrate occupational safety and health (OSH) within this emerging technological context and analyse the impacts of their use. This study aims to explore how companies interact with macro-level interventions that promote technological innovation and to understand their impact on different dimensions of company performance, including aspects related to OSH. Based on the existing literature, a research framework is presented that identifies the stakeholders involved, the inputs facilitating their interaction, and the cascading effects and changes. A mixed-methods approach was adopted by employing an in-depth survey with 89 companies responding and composed of both open-ended questions, to capture rich, qualitative insights, and multiple-choice questions, to gather quantifiable data. Two change levels have been identified: general changes and specific changes related to OSH. The analysis also delved into the main drivers and barriers that lead companies to engage with technological improvements and the multiple changes these interventions generate across company dimensions.

摘要

技术创新和工业 5.0 在研究人员中越来越受到关注,因为它们为企业提供了显著的竞争优势。另一方面,引入这些技术也给工人带来了新的风险。现有文献表明,缺乏有效将职业安全与健康(OSH)纳入这一新兴技术背景并分析其使用影响的研究。本研究旨在探讨公司如何与促进技术创新的宏观层面干预措施相互作用,并了解其对公司绩效的不同维度的影响,包括与 OSH 相关的方面。基于现有文献,提出了一个研究框架,确定了涉及的利益相关者、促进他们相互作用的投入,以及级联效应和变化。采用混合方法,对 89 家公司进行了深入调查,其中包括开放式问题,以获取丰富的定性见解,以及多项选择题,以收集可量化的数据。确定了两个变革层面:与 OSH 相关的一般变革和具体变革。分析还深入研究了导致公司参与技术改进的主要驱动因素和障碍,以及这些干预措施在公司各个层面产生的多种变化。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/c57bc8135d90/ijerph-21-01368-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/fb0a9d4d6e38/ijerph-21-01368-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/8a3032f130f8/ijerph-21-01368-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/04d8482ec7e4/ijerph-21-01368-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/c57bc8135d90/ijerph-21-01368-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/fb0a9d4d6e38/ijerph-21-01368-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/8a3032f130f8/ijerph-21-01368-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/04d8482ec7e4/ijerph-21-01368-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4ab4/11506840/c57bc8135d90/ijerph-21-01368-g004.jpg

相似文献

1
Examining the Complex Interaction Among Technological Innovation, Company Performance, and Occupational Safety and Health: A Mixed-Methods Study.审视技术创新、公司绩效和职业安全健康之间的复杂交互关系:混合方法研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2024 Oct 16;21(10):1368. doi: 10.3390/ijerph21101368.
2
The Perception of Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Regulation and Innovation Efficiency in the Construction Industry: Evidence from South Korea.建筑行业职业安全与健康法规认知与创新效率:来自韩国的证据。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Feb 27;18(5):2334. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18052334.
3
Using lagging and leading indicators for the evaluation of occupational safety and health performance in industry.利用滞后指标和领先指标评估工业中的职业安全与健康绩效。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2015;21(3):284-90. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1081769.
4
Occupational safety and health aspects of corporate social responsibility reporting in Japan from 2004 to 2012.2004年至2012年日本企业社会责任报告中的职业安全与健康方面
BMC Public Health. 2017 May 2;17(1):381. doi: 10.1186/s12889-017-4356-y.
5
A staffing perspective on barriers to and facilitators of temporary worker safety and health.临时工人安全与健康障碍及其促进因素的人员配备视角。
Am J Ind Med. 2023 Sep;66(9):736-749. doi: 10.1002/ajim.23509. Epub 2023 Jul 10.
6
Robotization of Industrial Processes: Motivational Differences between Companies with and without Existing Robotic Processes.工业流程的自动化:已有机器人流程与尚无机器人流程的公司之间的动机差异。
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors. 2024 Jan-Jun;12(1-2):41-54. doi: 10.1080/24725838.2023.2278794. Epub 2023 Nov 11.
7
OSH Performance within TQM Application in Construction Companies: A Qualitative Study in Saudi Arabia.OSH 绩效在建筑公司全面质量管理应用中的表现:沙特阿拉伯的定性研究。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Sep 28;19(19):12299. doi: 10.3390/ijerph191912299.
8
A systematic review of the application of immersive technologies for safety and health management in the construction sector.沉浸式技术在建筑安全与健康管理中的应用:系统综述
J Safety Res. 2023 Jun;85:66-85. doi: 10.1016/j.jsr.2023.01.007. Epub 2023 Jan 31.
9
Consideration of psychosocial factors in workplace risk assessments: findings from a company survey in Germany.考虑工作场所风险评估中的社会心理因素:来自德国公司调查的结果。
Int Arch Occup Environ Health. 2019 Apr;92(3):435-451. doi: 10.1007/s00420-019-01416-5. Epub 2019 Feb 13.
10
Young Workers' Access to and Awareness of Occupational Safety and Health Services: Age-Differences and Possible Drivers in a Large Survey of Employees in Italy.青年工人获得和了解职业安全与健康服务的情况:意大利一项大型员工调查中的年龄差异和可能的驱动因素。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 17;15(7):1511. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15071511.

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of Occupational Safety and Health interventions: a long way to go.职业安全与健康干预措施的效果:任重道远。
Front Public Health. 2024 May 9;12:1292692. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2024.1292692. eCollection 2024.
2
Management Approaches to Health and Safety at Work during Prevention Intervention Planning.工作场所健康与安全管理方法在预防干预规划期间。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2023 Dec 5;20(24):7142. doi: 10.3390/ijerph20247142.
3
Using Core Elements of Health and Safety Management Systems to Support Worker Well-Being during Technology Integration.
利用健康和安全管理系统的核心要素在技术整合过程中支持员工的健康福祉。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Oct 25;19(21):13849. doi: 10.3390/ijerph192113849.
4
How to design, implement and evaluate organizational interventions for maximum impact: the Sigtuna Principles.如何设计、实施和评估组织干预措施以实现最大影响:锡格蒂纳原则。
Eur J Work Organ Psychol. 2020 Aug 26;30(3):415-427. doi: 10.1080/1359432X.2020.1803960. eCollection 2021.
5
The occupational health and safety dimension of Industry 4.0.工业4.0的职业健康与安全层面
Med Lav. 2018 Oct 29;110(5):327-338. doi: 10.23749/mdl.v110i5.7282.
6
The Transition from Occupational Safety and Health (OSH) Interventions to OSH Outcomes: An Empirical Analysis of Mechanisms and Contextual Factors within Small and Medium-Sized Enterprises.从职业安全与健康(OSH)干预到 OSH 结果的转变:中小企业内部机制和情境因素的实证分析。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2018 Jul 31;15(8):1621. doi: 10.3390/ijerph15081621.
7
Why so many "rigorous" evaluations fail to identify unintended consequences of development programs: How mixed methods can contribute.为何如此多“严格”的评估未能识别发展项目的意外后果:混合方法如何发挥作用。
Eval Program Plann. 2016 Apr;55:155-62. doi: 10.1016/j.evalprogplan.2016.01.001. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
8
Drivers for OSH interventions in small and medium-sized enterprises.中小企业职业安全与健康干预措施的驱动因素。
Int J Occup Saf Ergon. 2016;22(1):102-15. doi: 10.1080/10803548.2015.1117351.
9
The Context, Process, and Outcome Evaluation Model for Organisational Health Interventions.组织健康干预的背景、过程与结果评估模型
Biomed Res Int. 2015;2015:414832. doi: 10.1155/2015/414832. Epub 2015 Oct 18.
10
Intervention research: science, skills, and strategies.干预研究:科学、技能与策略。
Am J Ind Med. 1996 Apr;29(4):285-8. doi: 10.1002/(SICI)1097-0274(199604)29:4<285::AID-AJIM1>3.0.CO;2-O.