Martin-Willett Renée, Skrzynski Carillon J, Taylor Ethan M, Sempio Cristina, Klawitter Jost, Bidwell L Cinnamon
Department of Psychology & Neuroscience, University of Colorado Boulder, Boulder, CO 80309, USA.
Department of Anesthesiology, iC42 Clinical Research and Development, University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus, Aurora, CO 80045, USA.
Pharmaceuticals (Basel). 2024 Oct 6;17(10):1335. doi: 10.3390/ph17101335.
The public is increasingly reporting using cannabis for anxiety relief. Both cannabis use and the endocannabinoid system have been connected with anxiety relief/anxiolytic properties, but these relationships are complex, and the underlying mechanisms for them are unclear. : Work is needed to understand how the endocannabinoid system, including the endocannabinoids anandamide (AEA) and 2-arachidonoylglycerol (2-AG), may be impacted by the main constituents of cannabis, Δ9-tetrahydrocannabinol (THC), and cannabidiol (CBD). : The current study examined how the ab libitum use of products differing in THC and CBD affected AEA and 2-AG among 292 individuals randomly assigned to THC-dominant use (N = 92), CBD-dominant use (N = 97), THC + CBD use (N = 74), or non-use (N = 29). The findings suggest that AEA levels do not change differently based on 4 weeks of cannabis use or by cannabinoid content, as AEA similarly increased across all conditions from study weeks 2 to 4. In contrast, AEA decreased at an acute administration session with product conditions containing any THC having greater AEA levels on average than the non-use condition. With regard to 2-AG, its levels appeared to primarily be affected by THC-dominant use, both acutely and over 4 weeks, when controlling for baseline cannabis use and examining study product use frequency among use conditions. Overall, the results continue to shed light on the complicated relationship between cannabinoid content and endocannabinoid production, and highlight the need for continued research on their interplay in human subjects.
越来越多的公众报告称使用大麻来缓解焦虑。大麻使用和内源性大麻素系统都与缓解焦虑/抗焦虑特性有关,但这些关系很复杂,其潜在机制尚不清楚。需要开展研究来了解内源性大麻素系统,包括内源性大麻素花生四烯乙醇胺(AEA)和2-花生四烯酸甘油酯(2-AG),可能如何受到大麻的主要成分Δ9-四氢大麻酚(THC)和大麻二酚(CBD)的影响。当前的研究考察了在292名被随机分配至以THC为主的使用组(N = 92)、以CBD为主的使用组(N = 97)、THC + CBD使用组(N = 74)或不使用组(N = 29)的个体中,随意使用THC和CBD含量不同的产品如何影响AEA和2-AG。研究结果表明,AEA水平不会因4周的大麻使用或大麻素含量而有不同变化,因为从研究的第2周到第4周,所有情况下AEA均同样增加。相比之下,在急性给药环节,含有任何THC的产品条件下AEA水平平均高于不使用条件,此时AEA会降低。关于2-AG,在控制基线大麻使用情况并考察使用条件下的研究产品使用频率时,其水平似乎主要在急性和4周期间受到以THC为主的使用的影响。总体而言,这些结果继续揭示了大麻素含量与内源性大麻素产生之间的复杂关系,并突出了继续研究它们在人体中相互作用的必要性。