• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于左主干冠状动脉支架置入患者的比较

Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with left main Coronary Artery Stenting.

作者信息

Yan Yufeng, Xu Haimei, Zhao Yingying, Lin Song, Zheng Yaguo

机构信息

Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, 210006, Jiangsu, China.

Department of Cardiology, Nanjing First Hospital, Nanjing Medical University, No. 68 Changle Road, Qinhuai District, Nanjing, 210006, Jiangsu, China.

出版信息

Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Oct 26. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07636-3.

DOI:10.1007/s10557-024-07636-3
PMID:39460906
Abstract

PURPOSE

The left main (LM) coronary artery disease poses high risks for its special anatomical characteristics. Optimal antiplatelet therapy is still controversial in this disease. We aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of ticagrelor and clopidogrel in patients with stent implantation in the LM coronary artery.

METHODS

We analyzed 3221 patients with stent implantation in the LM coronary artery from January 2011 to June 2022. Patients were separated into two groups: the ticagrelor group (n = 1550) and the clopidogrel group (n = 1671). Baseline data were balanced by propensity score matching. The primary endpoint was all-cause mortality, and secondary endpoints included cardiovascular death, myocardial infarction, stroke, stent thrombosis, or target vessel revascularization. The primary safety endpoint was major bleeding, defined as BARC 3, 5 bleeding.

RESULTS

After propensity score matching (n = 1228 in each group), ticagrelor was linked to a lower incidence of all-cause mortality compared with clopidogrel after a three-year follow-up (5.7% vs. 8.5%; HR:0.728; 95%CI:0.537-0.985, P = 0.040). Ticagrelor treatment reduced target lesion revascularization (3.3% vs. 6.4%; HR: 0.542; 95%CI: 0.371-0.791, P = 0.001) and stent thrombosis (1.6% vs. 3.7%; HR: 0.459; 95%CI: 0.271-0.776, P = 0.004). There was no significant difference in major bleeding between the two groups. Multivariate COX analysis suggested that age, heart rate, diabetes, prior myocardial infarction, hemoglobin, serum creatinine, ticagrelor, DAPT duration, LM true-bifurcation, LM stent diameters, and IVUS were independent predictive parameters of all-cause death.

CONCLUSIONS

Ticagrelor was associated with lower all-cause mortality and no increased risk of major bleeding compared to clopidogrel in LM stenting patients. Thus, ticagrelor can be considered a viable substitute for clopidogrel in LM disease.

摘要

目的

左主干(LM)冠状动脉疾病因其特殊的解剖学特征而具有高风险。在这种疾病中,最佳抗血小板治疗仍存在争议。我们旨在研究替格瑞洛和氯吡格雷在LM冠状动脉支架植入患者中的疗效和安全性。

方法

我们分析了2011年1月至2022年6月期间3221例LM冠状动脉支架植入患者。患者分为两组:替格瑞洛组(n = 1550)和氯吡格雷组(n = 1671)。通过倾向评分匹配使基线数据达到平衡。主要终点是全因死亡率,次要终点包括心血管死亡、心肌梗死、中风、支架血栓形成或靶血管血运重建。主要安全终点是大出血,定义为BARC 3、5级出血。

结果

经过倾向评分匹配(每组n = 1228),在三年随访后,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛与较低的全因死亡率相关(5.7%对8.5%;HR:0.728;95%CI:0.537 - 0.985,P = 0.040)。替格瑞洛治疗降低了靶病变血运重建(3.3%对6.4%;HR:0.542;95%CI:0.371 - 0.791,P = 0.001)和支架血栓形成(1.6%对3.7%;HR:0.459;95%CI:0.271 - 0.776,P = 0.004)。两组大出血发生率无显著差异。多变量COX分析表明,年龄、心率、糖尿病、既往心肌梗死、血红蛋白、血清肌酐、替格瑞洛、双联抗血小板治疗持续时间、LM真性分叉、LM支架直径和血管内超声是全因死亡的独立预测参数。

结论

在LM冠状动脉支架植入患者中,与氯吡格雷相比,替格瑞洛与较低的全因死亡率相关且大出血风险未增加。因此,在LM疾病中,替格瑞洛可被视为氯吡格雷的可行替代药物。

相似文献

1
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with left main Coronary Artery Stenting.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于左主干冠状动脉支架置入患者的比较
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Oct 26. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07636-3.
2
Effects of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients with Coronary Bifurcation Lesions Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的冠状动脉分叉病变患者的影响。
Biomed Res Int. 2019 Mar 20;2019:3170957. doi: 10.1155/2019/3170957. eCollection 2019.
3
Dual Antiplatelet Therapy De-Escalation in Stabilized Myocardial Infarction With High Ischemic Risk: Post Hoc Analysis of the TALOS-AMI Randomized Clinical Trial.稳定型心肌梗死伴高缺血风险患者的双联抗血小板治疗降级:TALOS-AMI 随机临床试验的事后分析。
JAMA Cardiol. 2024 Feb 1;9(2):125-133. doi: 10.1001/jamacardio.2023.4587.
4
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
5
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease and prior coronary artery disease: Insights from the EUCLID trial.替卡格雷与氯吡格雷在有症状外周动脉疾病和既往冠状动脉疾病患者中的比较:来自 EUCLID 试验的结果。
Vasc Med. 2018 Dec;23(6):523-530. doi: 10.1177/1358863X18775594. Epub 2018 Jul 11.
6
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in acute myocardial infarction patients with multivessel disease; From Korea Acute Myocardial Infarction Registry-National Institute of Health.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷治疗多支血管病变急性心肌梗死患者的比较:来自韩国急性心肌梗死注册研究-国家卫生研究院。
J Cardiol. 2020 May;75(5):478-484. doi: 10.1016/j.jjcc.2019.11.003. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
7
Utility of a pharmacogenetic-driven algorithm in guiding dual antiplatelet therapy for patients undergoing coronary drug-eluting stent implantation in China.在中国,药物洗脱支架置入术后患者采用基于药物遗传学的指导方案进行双联抗血小板治疗的效用。
Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2022 Feb;78(2):215-225. doi: 10.1007/s00228-021-03224-8. Epub 2021 Oct 12.
8
Long versus short dual antiplatelet therapy in acute coronary syndrome patients treated with prasugrel or ticagrelor and coronary revascularization: Insights from the RENAMI registry.接受普拉格雷或替格瑞洛治疗的急性冠脉综合征患者中长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗与冠状动脉血运重建:来自 RENAMI 注册研究的结果。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2020 May;27(7):696-705. doi: 10.1177/2047487319836327. Epub 2019 Mar 12.
9
Impact of Ticagrelor vs. Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention After Risk Stratification With the CHADS-VASc Score.在采用CHADS-VASc评分进行风险分层后,替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷对接受经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者的影响。
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 Apr 4;9:808571. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.808571. eCollection 2022.
10
Bleeding risk in patients prescribed dual antiplatelet therapy and triple therapy after coronary interventions: the ADAPTT retrospective population-based cohort studies.接受冠状动脉介入治疗后接受双联抗血小板治疗和三联治疗的患者的出血风险:ADAPTT 回顾性基于人群的队列研究。
Health Technol Assess. 2023 May;27(8):1-257. doi: 10.3310/MNJY9014.

引用本文的文献

1
Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel: Two Controversial Drugs in Patients with Acute Coronary Syndrome.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷:急性冠脉综合征患者中两种有争议的药物。
Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 2024 Nov 14. doi: 10.1007/s10557-024-07645-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Ticagrelor alone versus ticagrelor plus aspirin from month 1 to month 12 after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes (ULTIMATE-DAPT): a randomised, placebo-controlled, double-blind clinical trial.替格瑞洛单用或替格瑞洛加阿司匹林用于急性冠脉综合征患者经皮冠状动脉介入治疗后 1 至 12 个月(ULTIMATE-DAPT):一项随机、安慰剂对照、双盲临床试验。
Lancet. 2024 May 11;403(10439):1866-1878. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(24)00473-2. Epub 2024 Apr 7.
2
Contemporary Use of Ticagrelor vs Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A GRACE Risk Score Stratification-Based Analysis in a Large-Scale, Real-World Study From China.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的当代应用:来自中国一项大规模真实世界研究中基于 GRACE 风险评分分层的分析。
Mayo Clin Proc. 2023 Jul;98(7):1021-1032. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2023.02.004.
3
Left main bifurcation stenting: impact of residual ischaemia on cardiovascular mortality.左主干分叉病变支架置入术:残余缺血对心血管死亡率的影响。
Eur Heart J. 2023 Nov 1;44(41):4324-4336. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehad318.
4
Comparative Safety and Effectiveness of Ticagrelor versus Clopidogrel in Patients With Acute Coronary Syndrome: An On-Treatment Analysis From a Multicenter Registry.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在急性冠状动脉综合征患者中的安全性和有效性比较:一项多中心注册研究的治疗中分析
Front Cardiovasc Med. 2022 May 27;9:887748. doi: 10.3389/fcvm.2022.887748. eCollection 2022.
5
New Insights Into Long- Versus Short-Term Dual Antiplatelet Therapy Duration in Patients After Stenting for Left Main Coronary Artery Disease: Findings From a Prospective Observational Study.左主干冠状动脉疾病患者支架置入术后长程与短程双联抗血小板治疗时间的新认识:一项前瞻性观察研究的结果。
Circ Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 Jun;15(6):e011536. doi: 10.1161/CIRCINTERVENTIONS.121.011536. Epub 2022 May 18.
6
Comparison of Clinical Outcomes Between Ticagrelor and Clopidogrel in Elderly Patients Undergoing Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Cohort Study.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷在行经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的老年患者中的临床结局比较:一项队列研究。
Clin Interv Aging. 2022 Apr 2;17:331-341. doi: 10.2147/CIA.S355210. eCollection 2022.
7
Ticagrelor versus clopidogrel in patients with acute coronary syndrome undergoing complex percutaneous coronary intervention.替格瑞洛与氯吡格雷用于复杂经皮冠状动脉介入治疗的急性冠状动脉综合征患者。
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv. 2022 May;99 Suppl 1:1395-1402. doi: 10.1002/ccd.30077. Epub 2022 Jan 15.
8
Prevalence and Impact of High Bleeding Risk in Patients Undergoing Left Main Artery Disease PCI.左主干动脉疾病经皮冠状动脉介入治疗患者高出血风险的患病率及影响
JACC Cardiovasc Interv. 2021 Nov 22;14(22):2447-2457. doi: 10.1016/j.jcin.2021.08.056.
9
Comparison of one-month versus twelve-month dual antiplatelet therapy after implantation of drug-eluting stents guided by either intravascular ultrasound or angiography in patients with acute coronary syndrome: rationale and design of prospective, multicenter, randomized, controlled IVUS-ACS and ULTIMATE-DAPT trial.比较血管内超声或血管造影指导下急性冠脉综合征患者药物洗脱支架植入术后 1 个月与 12 个月双联抗血小板治疗:前瞻性、多中心、随机、对照 IVUS-ACS 和 ULTIMATE-DAPT 试验的原理和设计。
Am Heart J. 2021 Jun;236:49-58. doi: 10.1016/j.ahj.2021.02.014. Epub 2021 Feb 20.
10
Optimal Duration for Dual Antiplatelet Therapy After Left Main Coronary Artery Stenting.左主干冠状动脉支架置入术后双联抗血小板治疗的最佳持续时间。
Circ J. 2020 Dec 25;85(1):59-68. doi: 10.1253/circj.CJ-20-0362. Epub 2020 Dec 5.