Zhang XiangMin, Tan YanDi, He XiaoYa, Huang Jie, Ni XiaoYing, Hu Qian, Cai JinHua
Department of Radiology, Children's Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, National Clinical Research Center for Child Health and Disorders, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Child Development and Disorders, Chongqing, China; Chongqing Engineering Research Center of Stem Cell Therapy, Chongqing, China.
Department of Ultrasound, the Third Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Biomol Biomed. 2025 Jan 30;25(3):541-552. doi: 10.17305/bb.2024.11268.
Glioma is one of the most prevalent primary intracranial tumors, and biomarker testing offers a non-invasive modality with high diagnostic efficiency. The aim of this meta-analysis is to evaluate the diagnostic effectiveness of exosomes as biomarkers for glioma. We included 16 studies on exosomes as biomarkers for gliomas. The pooled sensitivity (SEN), specificity (SPE), positive likelihood ratio (PLR), negative likelihood ratio (NLR), diagnostic odds ratio (DOR), and area under the curve (AUC) for 25 biomarkers across these 16 studies were as follows: 82% (95% CI: 0.77-0.86), 91% (95% CI: 0.86-0.94), 9.10 (95% CI: 5.64-14.68), 0.20 (95% CI: 0.16-0.25), 45.94 (95% CI: 25.40-83.09), and 0.92 (95% CI: 0.89-0.94), respectively. Meta-regression indicated that biomarker analysis, biomarker type, and sample size may be sources of heterogeneity. Subgroup analysis suggested that ultracentrifugation (UC) was a better method for extracting exosomes. miRNA and other RNA groups (sncRNA, lncRNA, circRNA) provided higher SEN (0.88 vs. 0.84 vs. 0.78) compared to proteins. This study demonstrates the superior diagnostic efficacy of exosomes as biomarkers for gliomas, with high accuracy in diagnosing gliomas.
胶质瘤是最常见的原发性颅内肿瘤之一,生物标志物检测提供了一种诊断效率高的非侵入性方法。本荟萃分析的目的是评估外泌体作为胶质瘤生物标志物的诊断有效性。我们纳入了16项关于外泌体作为胶质瘤生物标志物的研究。这16项研究中25种生物标志物的合并敏感性(SEN)、特异性(SPE)、阳性似然比(PLR)、阴性似然比(NLR)、诊断比值比(DOR)和曲线下面积(AUC)如下:分别为82%(95%CI:0.77-0.86)、91%(95%CI:0.86-0.94)、9.10(95%CI:5.64-14.68)、0.20(95%CI:0.16-0.25)、45.94(95%CI:25.40-83.09)和0.92(95%CI:0.89-0.94)。Meta回归表明,生物标志物分析、生物标志物类型和样本量可能是异质性的来源。亚组分析表明,超速离心(UC)是提取外泌体的更好方法。与蛋白质相比,miRNA和其他RNA组(sncRNA、lncRNA、circRNA)提供了更高的敏感性(0.88对0.84对0.78)。本研究证明了外泌体作为胶质瘤生物标志物具有卓越的诊断效力,在诊断胶质瘤方面具有很高的准确性。