Sayler Kristina, McLaughlin Katie A, Belsky Jay
University of California, Davis, Davis, California, USA.
Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts, USA.
Child Dev. 2025 Mar-Apr;96(2):606-618. doi: 10.1111/cdev.14188. Epub 2024 Oct 28.
Extensive evidence documents negative consequences of adversity for children's development. Here, we extend such work by looking beyond average effects to consider variation in susceptibility to both threat and deprivation in terms of cognitive and social-emotional development, using an influence-statistic methodology. Data come from the ongoing Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children (N = 14,541, 49.1% female, age range: 6 month to 12 year, race and ethnicity: 97.8% white, 0.4% black, and 0.6% other). With respect to anticipated associations of threat with problem behavior and of deprivation with cognition, results of this pre-registered research revealed that a roughly equal proportion of children proved to be susceptible in a domain-general manner (similarly influenced) and a domain-specific one (dissimilarly influenced). Implications for intervention are considered.
大量证据证明了逆境对儿童发展的负面影响。在此,我们拓展此类研究,超越平均效应,运用影响统计方法,从认知和社会情感发展方面考虑对威胁和剥夺的易感性差异。数据来自正在进行的雅芳亲子纵向研究(样本量N = 14541,女性占49.1%,年龄范围:6个月至12岁,种族和族裔:97.8%为白人,0.4%为黑人,0.6%为其他)。关于威胁与问题行为以及剥夺与认知的预期关联,这项预先注册研究的结果显示,大致相同比例的儿童被证明在领域通用方式(受到类似影响)和领域特定方式(受到不同影响)上是易受影响的。文中还考虑了对干预措施的启示。