• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

移动键盘退格键速率的数字表型及其与心境障碍症状的关联:算法的开发与验证。

Digital Phenotypes of Mobile Keyboard Backspace Rates and Their Associations With Symptoms of Mood Disorder: Algorithm Development and Validation.

机构信息

Department of Psychological and Brain Sciences, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.

Department of Psychiatry, University of Illinois Chicago, Chicago, IL, United States.

出版信息

J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 29;26:e51269. doi: 10.2196/51269.

DOI:10.2196/51269
PMID:39471368
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11558221/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Passive sensing through smartphone keyboard data can be used to identify and monitor symptoms of mood disorders with low participant burden. Behavioral phenotyping based on mobile keystroke data can aid in clinical decision-making and provide insights into the individual symptoms of mood disorders.

OBJECTIVE

This study aims to derive digital phenotypes based on smartphone keyboard backspace use among 128 community adults across 2948 observations using a Bayesian mixture model.

METHODS

Eligible study participants completed a virtual screening visit where all eligible participants were instructed to download the custom-built BiAffect smartphone keyboard (University of Illinois). The BiAffect keyboard unobtrusively captures keystroke dynamics. All eligible and consenting participants were instructed to use this keyboard exclusively for up to 4 weeks of the study in real life, and participants' compliance was checked at the 2 follow-up visits at week 2 and week 4. As part of the research protocol, every study participant underwent evaluations by a study psychiatrist during each visit.

RESULTS

We found that derived phenotypes were associated with not only the diagnoses and severity of depression and mania but also specific individual symptoms. Using a linear mixed-effects model with random intercepts accounting for the nested data structure from daily data, the backspace rates on the continuous scale did not differ between participants in the healthy control and in the mood disorders groups (P=.11). The 3-class model had mean backspace rates of 0.112, 0.180, and 0.268, respectively, with a SD of 0.048. In total, 3 classes, respectively, were estimated to comprise 37.5% (n=47), 54.4% (n=72), and 8.1% (n=9) of the sample. We grouped individuals into Low, Medium, and High backspace rate groups. Individuals with unipolar mood disorder were predominantly in the Medium group (n=54), with some in the Low group (n=27) and a few in the High group (n=6). The Medium group, compared with the Low group, had significantly higher ratings of depression (b=2.32, P=.008). The High group was not associated with ratings of depression with (P=.88) or without (P=.27) adjustment for medication and diagnoses. The High group, compared with the Low group, was associated with both nonzero ratings (b=1.91, P=.02) and higher ratings of mania (b=1.46, P<.001). The High group, compared with the Low group, showed significantly higher odds of elevated mood (P=.03), motor activity (P=.04), and irritability (P<.05).

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates the promise of mobile typing kinematics in mood disorder research and practice. Monitoring a single mobile typing kinematic feature, that is, backspace rates, through passive sensing imposes a low burden on the participants. Based on real-life keystroke data, our derived digital phenotypes from this single feature can be useful for researchers and practitioners to distinguish between individuals with and those without mood disorder symptoms.

摘要

背景

通过智能手机键盘数据进行被动感应,可以在低参与者负担的情况下识别和监测情绪障碍的症状。基于移动按键数据的行为表型可以帮助临床决策,并深入了解情绪障碍的个体症状。

目的

本研究旨在使用贝叶斯混合模型,从 128 名社区成年人的 2948 次观察中,基于智能手机键盘退格键的使用情况得出数字表型。

方法

符合条件的研究参与者完成了一次虚拟筛查访问,所有符合条件的参与者都被指示下载定制的 BiAffect 智能手机键盘(伊利诺伊大学)。BiAffect 键盘可在不引人注目的情况下捕获按键动态。所有符合条件并同意的参与者都被指示在研究的 4 周内,在现实生活中独家使用该键盘,并且在第 2 周和第 4 周的 2 次随访中检查参与者的依从性。作为研究方案的一部分,每位研究参与者在每次就诊时都由研究精神科医生进行评估。

结果

我们发现,衍生的表型不仅与抑郁和躁狂的诊断和严重程度相关,而且与特定的个体症状相关。使用具有随机截距的线性混合效应模型来解释日常数据的嵌套数据结构,在健康对照组和情绪障碍组的参与者中,连续量表上的退格率没有差异(P=.11)。3 类模型的退格率均值分别为 0.112、0.180 和 0.268,标准差为 0.048。总共估计有 3 个类别,分别由 37.5%(n=47)、54.4%(n=72)和 8.1%(n=9)的样本组成。我们将个体分为低、中、高退格率组。单相情绪障碍患者主要在中组(n=54),少数在低组(n=27),少数在高组(n=6)。与低组相比,中组的抑郁评分明显更高(b=2.32,P=.008)。与调整药物和诊断无关(P=.88)或有关(P=.27)时,高组与抑郁评分无关。与低组相比,高组与非零评分(b=1.91,P=.02)和更高的躁狂评分(b=1.46,P<.001)均相关。与低组相比,高组表现出更高的情绪升高(P=.03)、运动活动(P=.04)和易怒(P<.05)的几率。

结论

本研究证明了移动打字运动学在情绪障碍研究和实践中的潜力。通过被动感应监测单个移动打字运动学特征,即退格率,对参与者的负担较低。基于现实生活中的按键数据,我们从这个单一特征得出的衍生数字表型可以帮助研究人员和从业者区分有和没有情绪障碍症状的个体。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c0d/11558221/e3631e49c8dc/jmir_v26i1e51269_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c0d/11558221/545d603f39b4/jmir_v26i1e51269_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c0d/11558221/ac7e269821c8/jmir_v26i1e51269_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c0d/11558221/e3631e49c8dc/jmir_v26i1e51269_fig3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c0d/11558221/545d603f39b4/jmir_v26i1e51269_fig1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c0d/11558221/ac7e269821c8/jmir_v26i1e51269_fig2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3c0d/11558221/e3631e49c8dc/jmir_v26i1e51269_fig3.jpg

相似文献

1
Digital Phenotypes of Mobile Keyboard Backspace Rates and Their Associations With Symptoms of Mood Disorder: Algorithm Development and Validation.移动键盘退格键速率的数字表型及其与心境障碍症状的关联:算法的开发与验证。
J Med Internet Res. 2024 Oct 29;26:e51269. doi: 10.2196/51269.
2
Computer and mobile technology interventions for self-management in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.用于慢性阻塞性肺疾病自我管理的计算机和移动技术干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 May 23;5(5):CD011425. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011425.pub2.
3
Sertindole for schizophrenia.用于治疗精神分裂症的舍吲哚。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2005 Jul 20;2005(3):CD001715. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001715.pub2.
4
Pramipexole in addition to mood stabilisers for treatment-resistant bipolar depression: the PAX-BD randomised double-blind placebo-controlled trial.普拉克索联合心境稳定剂治疗难治性双相抑郁:PAX - BD随机双盲安慰剂对照试验
Health Technol Assess. 2025 May;29(21):1-216. doi: 10.3310/HBFC1953.
5
Signs and symptoms to determine if a patient presenting in primary care or hospital outpatient settings has COVID-19.在基层医疗机构或医院门诊环境中,如果患者出现以下症状和体征,可判断其是否患有 COVID-19。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 May 20;5(5):CD013665. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013665.pub3.
6
Smartphone and tablet self management apps for asthma.用于哮喘的智能手机和平板电脑自我管理应用程序。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2013 Nov 27;2013(11):CD010013. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010013.pub2.
7
Falls prevention interventions for community-dwelling older adults: systematic review and meta-analysis of benefits, harms, and patient values and preferences.社区居住的老年人跌倒预防干预措施:系统评价和荟萃分析的益处、危害以及患者的价值观和偏好。
Syst Rev. 2024 Nov 26;13(1):289. doi: 10.1186/s13643-024-02681-3.
8
Systemic pharmacological treatments for chronic plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.系统性药理学治疗慢性斑块状银屑病:网络荟萃分析。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2021 Apr 19;4(4):CD011535. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011535.pub4.
9
Acceptability of Personal Sensing Among People With Alcohol Use Disorder: Observational Study.酒精使用障碍患者对个人感知的可接受性:观察性研究。
JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2023 Aug 28;11:e41833. doi: 10.2196/41833.
10
Development of prediction models for screening depression and anxiety using smartphone and wearable-based digital phenotyping: protocol for the Smartphone and Wearable Assessment for Real-Time Screening of Depression and Anxiety (SWARTS-DA) observational study in Korea.利用智能手机和可穿戴设备的数字表型开发抑郁症和焦虑症筛查预测模型:韩国抑郁症和焦虑症实时筛查智能手机与可穿戴设备评估(SWARTS-DA)观察性研究方案
BMJ Open. 2025 Jun 20;15(6):e096773. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2024-096773.

本文引用的文献

1
Smartphone keyboard dynamics predict affect in suicidal ideation.智能手机键盘动态可预测自杀意念中的情感状态。
NPJ Digit Med. 2024 Mar 1;7(1):54. doi: 10.1038/s41746-024-01048-1.
2
Smartphone-derived Virtual Keyboard Dynamics Coupled with Accelerometer Data as a Window into Understanding Brain Health: Smartphone Keyboard and Accelerometer as Window into Brain Health.智能手机衍生的虚拟键盘动态数据与加速度计数据相结合,作为了解脑健康的窗口:智能手机键盘和加速度计作为脑健康的窗口。
Proc SIGCHI Conf Hum Factor Comput Syst. 2023 Apr;2023. doi: 10.1145/3544548.3580906. Epub 2023 Apr 19.
3
Digital Phenotyping: Data-Driven Psychiatry to Redefine Mental Health.
数字表型:以数据为驱动的精神病学重新定义精神健康。
J Med Internet Res. 2023 Oct 4;25:e44502. doi: 10.2196/44502.
4
Associations between smartphone keystroke dynamics and cognition in MS.多发性硬化症患者智能手机按键动力学与认知之间的关联。
Digit Health. 2022 Dec 5;8:20552076221143234. doi: 10.1177/20552076221143234. eCollection 2022 Jan-Dec.
5
Dissecting the depressed mood criterion in adult depression: The heterogeneity of mood disturbances in major depressive episodes.剖析成人抑郁症中的抑郁心境标准:重性抑郁发作中心境紊乱的异质性。
J Affect Disord. 2023 Feb 15;323:392-399. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2022.11.047. Epub 2022 Nov 28.
6
Digital health tools for the passive monitoring of depression: a systematic review of methods.用于抑郁症被动监测的数字健康工具:方法的系统评价
NPJ Digit Med. 2022 Jan 11;5(1):3. doi: 10.1038/s41746-021-00548-8.
7
The Effects of Bipolar Disorder Risk on a Mobile Phone Keystroke Dynamics Based Biomarker of Brain Age.双相情感障碍风险对基于手机按键动力学的脑年龄生物标志物的影响。
Front Psychiatry. 2021 Dec 22;12:739022. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.739022. eCollection 2021.
8
A physiometric investigation of inflammatory composites: Comparison of "a priori" aggregates, empirically-identified factors, and individual proteins.炎症复合物的生理测量研究:“先验”聚集体、经验识别因素与单个蛋白质的比较
Brain Behav Immun Health. 2021 Nov 17;18:100391. doi: 10.1016/j.bbih.2021.100391. eCollection 2021 Dec.
9
Differential associations of phasic and tonic irritability to suicidality among U.S. adults.美国成年人中,阵发性和紧张性易激惹与自杀意念的关联存在差异。
J Affect Disord. 2021 Sep 1;292:391-397. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.05.066. Epub 2021 Jun 16.
10
Back to Basics: The Importance of Measurement Properties in Biological Psychiatry.回归基础:测量属性在生物精神病学中的重要性。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2021 Apr;123:72-82. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2021.01.008. Epub 2021 Jan 23.