Bodien Yelena G, Fecchio Matteo, Freeman Holly J, Sanders William R, Meydan Anogue, Lawrence Phoebe K, Kirsch John E, Fischer David, Cohen Joseph, Rubin Emily, He Julian H, Schaefer Pamela W, Hochberg Leigh R, Rapalino Otto, Cash Sydney S, Young Michael J, Edlow Brian L
Center for Neurotechnology and Neurorecovery (YGB, MF, HJF, WRS, AM, PKL, DF, LRH, SSC, MJY, BLE), Department of Neurology, Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation (YGB), Spaulding Rehabilitation Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Charlestown, MA; Geisel School of Medicine at Dartmouth Medical School College (WRS), Hanover, NH; Athinoula A. Martinos Center for Biomedical Imaging (JEK, BLE), Massachusetts General Hospital, Charlestown, MA; Department of Radiology (JEK, JHH, PWS, OR), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA; Department of Neurology (DF), Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA; and Departments of Neurology (JC) and Medicine (ER), Massachusetts General Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA.
Neurol Clin Pract. 2025 Feb;15(1):e200390. doi: 10.1212/CPJ.0000000000200390. Epub 2024 Oct 25.
Cognitive motor dissociation (CMD) occurs when patients with severe brain injury follow commands on task-based functional MRI or EEG assessment despite demonstrating no behavioral evidence of language function. Recognizing the value of identifying patients with CMD, evidence-based guidelines published in the United States and Europe now recommend that these assessments are conducted as part of clinical care for select patients.
We describe our institutionally supported approach for clinical assessment of CMD and report lessons learned so that other centers can more easily implement these evaluations. Among the key lessons are the need to consider ethical implications of CMD assessment; establish standardized local protocols for patient selection, data acquisition, analysis, and interpretation; and develop effective strategies for communication of test results.
Independent validation of methods to assess CMD is not available. Our approach for clinical CMD assessment is intended to be flexible, allowing for iterative improvements as the evidence base grows.
严重脑损伤患者在基于任务的功能磁共振成像(fMRI)或脑电图(EEG)评估中能够听从指令,但在行为上却没有语言功能的证据,这种情况被称为认知运动分离(CMD)。认识到识别CMD患者的价值后,美国和欧洲发布的循证指南现在建议,这些评估应作为特定患者临床护理的一部分进行。
我们描述了我们机构支持的CMD临床评估方法,并报告了经验教训,以便其他中心能够更轻松地实施这些评估。其中的关键经验包括需要考虑CMD评估的伦理影响;建立患者选择、数据采集、分析和解释的标准化本地方案;以及制定有效的测试结果沟通策略。
目前尚无评估CMD方法的独立验证。我们的CMD临床评估方法旨在具有灵活性,以便随着证据基础的扩大进行迭代改进。