Zeng Hang, Lv Zhuoyan, Sun Xiaoyan, Tong Yang, Wu Wei, Dong Shipeng, Mao Liang
State Key Laboratory of Pollution Control and Resource Reuse, School of the Environment, Chemistry and Biomedicine Innovation Center, Nanjing University, Nanjing 210023, China.
Nanjing Qixia District Hospital, Nanjing 210023, China.
Environ Health (Wash). 2024 Mar 19;2(4):189-201. doi: 10.1021/envhealth.3c00138. eCollection 2024 Apr 19.
Understanding the bioaccumulation of nanomaterials (NMs) by organisms is essential in evaluating their potential ecotoxicity. However, the experimental determination of bioaccumulation is substantially challenging, which spawned the development of prediction approaches via establishing models for various NMs. Conventional modeling approaches, such as the biotic ligand model (BLM), partition coefficients, accumulation factor models, and quantitative structure-activity relationship (QSAR) models, were initially used in the application of NMs, aiming to provide a reliable quantitative dose in a resource-saving way. These methods, which are based on the uptake patterns of substances, probably lead to deviated results due to the different uptake behaviors of NMs. In this study, currently developed models to evaluate the bioaccumulation of NMs are critically reviewed, with their feasibilities and limitations being analyzed. In addition, the recently developed machine learning amended models have taken great efforts in realizing biological behaviors of NMs in organisms by providing predictions. Though this data-driven approach has limitations in mechanism exploration, it may give different insights into the bioaccumulation model establishment and critical feature identification.
了解生物体对纳米材料(NMs)的生物累积对于评估其潜在的生态毒性至关重要。然而,生物累积的实验测定极具挑战性,这催生了通过为各种纳米材料建立模型来开发预测方法。传统的建模方法,如生物配体模型(BLM)、分配系数、累积因子模型和定量构效关系(QSAR)模型,最初被用于纳米材料的应用,旨在以节省资源的方式提供可靠的定量剂量。这些基于物质摄取模式的方法,可能会由于纳米材料不同的摄取行为而导致结果偏差。在本研究中,对目前开发的评估纳米材料生物累积的模型进行了批判性综述,并分析了它们的可行性和局限性。此外,最近开发的机器学习修正模型在通过提供预测来实现纳米材料在生物体内的生物学行为方面付出了巨大努力。尽管这种数据驱动的方法在机制探索方面存在局限性,但它可能会为生物累积模型的建立和关键特征识别提供不同的见解。