Karahan Ayşegül, Zor Utku
Department of Cardiology, Anadolu Medical Center, Kocaeli, Türkiye.
Department of Cardiology, LIV Hospital Vadi İstanbul, İstanbul, Türkiye.
Anatol J Cardiol. 2024 Oct 30;28(12):592-8. doi: 10.14744/AnatolJCardiol.2024.4514.
Twenty-four-hour mean arterial pressure (MAP) is underutilized for the diagnosis and risk assessment of hypertension in clinical settings. The objective of this study is to assess the relation of MAP with systolic and diastolic blood pressure (BP) in diagnosing hypertension on 24-hour ambulatory blood pressure monitoring (ABPM), while also examining its diagnostic effectiveness.
This retrospective study analyzed 24-hour ABPM of 532 adults. Hypertension diagnosis was made based on 2 criteria: the standard 24-hour systolic/diastolic BP measurement criteria and the 24-hour MAP measurement criteria. The relation of the 24-hour MAP with systolic and diastolic measurements and the predictors affecting its accuracy were evaluated.
A total of 532 patients were included, and 409 (76.9%) were diagnosed with hypertension based on 24-hour ambulatory systolic/diastolic BP criteria. Among hypertensive patients, 191 (46.7%) were overlooked by 24-hour MAP criteria. Multiple logistic regression analysis identified age ≥52.4 (OR = 3.23, 95% CI:2.02-5.16, P < .001), female gender (OR = 2.54, 95%CI:1.61-4.02, P < .001), and less variation in daytime/nighttime systolic/diastolic BP as significant independent predictors of overlooked hypertension by 24-hour MAP criteria.
Our study highlights a relation between 24-hour MAP and systolic/diastolic BP measurements in diagnosing hypertension via 24-hour ABPM, especially in older adults and women. Systolic/diastolic criteria offer greater sensitivity for hypertension detection compared to MAP alone. This underscores the need for refined diagnostic criteria and suggests that reliance on MAP alone may lead to underdiagnosis in these vulnerable populations, necessitating further investigation.
在临床环境中,24小时平均动脉压(MAP)在高血压的诊断和风险评估中未得到充分利用。本研究的目的是在24小时动态血压监测(ABPM)中评估MAP与收缩压和舒张压(BP)在诊断高血压方面的关系,同时检验其诊断有效性。
这项回顾性研究分析了532名成年人的24小时ABPM数据。高血压诊断基于两个标准:标准的24小时收缩压/舒张压测量标准和24小时MAP测量标准。评估了24小时MAP与收缩压和舒张压测量值之间的关系以及影响其准确性的预测因素。
共纳入532例患者,根据24小时动态收缩压/舒张压标准,409例(76.9%)被诊断为高血压。在高血压患者中,191例(46.7%)被24小时MAP标准漏诊。多因素逻辑回归分析确定年龄≥52.4岁(OR = 3.23,95%CI:2.02 - 5.16,P <.001)、女性(OR = 2.54,95%CI:1.61 - 4.02,P <.001)以及日间/夜间收缩压/舒张压变化较小是24小时MAP标准漏诊高血压的显著独立预测因素。
我们的研究强调了在通过24小时ABPM诊断高血压时,24小时MAP与收缩压/舒张压测量值之间的关系,特别是在老年人和女性中。与单独使用MAP相比,收缩压/舒张压标准对高血压检测具有更高的敏感性。这凸显了需要完善诊断标准,并表明仅依赖MAP可能导致这些易感人群的诊断不足,有必要进一步研究。