Dahlin Lisa, Hansson Ingrid, Fall Nils, Sannö Axel, Jacobson Magdalena
Department of Clinical Sciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Department of Animal Biosciences, Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences, 750 07, Uppsala, Sweden.
Porcine Health Manag. 2024 Oct 30;10(1):45. doi: 10.1186/s40813-024-00400-x.
All-in, all-out with strict hygienic routines is necessary in modern pig production. Furthermore, a standardised, validated method is needed to quantitatively control the effect of these hygiene protocols. This study aimed to establish a reproducible and reliable sampling method to assess cleaning of the pig pen.
Sterilised pig faeces were mixed with indicator bacteria (i.e. Enterococcus hirae, Escherichia coli, Pseudomonas aeruginosa and Staphylococcus aureus) and spread out in a controlled environment. The retrieval rate of three different sampling methods were evaluated; swabbing by (i) a cloth and (ii) a sponge, analysed by standardised bacterial culture and counting of colony-forming units, and (iii) a cotton swab analysed by adenosine triphosphate (ATP) bioluminescence. Two time-points were evaluated during the study; after drying overnight and after manual scraping of the surfaces. To determine sample-to-sample variability, sampling by the cloth and the cotton swab was carried out after manual scraping and further, after high-pressure washing with cold water.
Sampling by the cloth and the sponge showed few differences in in the number of CFU obtained before and after the manual scraping (retrieval rate), whereas the swabs, measuring ATP bioluminescence, showed a very high retrieval rate. Sample-to-sample variability was low for all three methods.
In conclusion, to sample pens for the presence of bacteria, the cloth was assessed as the preferable material, being cheap, easy, specific, and approachable, and with a low sample-to-sample variability. The ATP measurement could have potential for use when evaluating the cleaning of stables, however, threshold values for evaluating the cleaning of a pig sty needs to be developed.
在现代养猪生产中,全进全出并严格执行卫生程序是必要的。此外,需要一种标准化、经过验证的方法来定量控制这些卫生规程的效果。本研究旨在建立一种可重复且可靠的采样方法,以评估猪舍的清洁情况。
将灭菌的猪粪便与指示菌(即平肠球菌、大肠杆菌、铜绿假单胞菌和金黄色葡萄球菌)混合,并在受控环境中铺开。评估了三种不同采样方法的回收率;(i)用布擦拭,(ii)用海绵擦拭,通过标准化细菌培养和菌落形成单位计数进行分析,以及(iii)用棉签通过三磷酸腺苷(ATP)生物发光法进行分析。在研究过程中评估了两个时间点;过夜干燥后以及手动刮擦表面后。为了确定样本间的变异性,在手动刮擦后以及用冷水高压冲洗后,用布和棉签进行采样。
用布和海绵采样在手动刮擦前后获得的菌落形成单位数量(回收率)上差异不大,而测量ATP生物发光的棉签显示出非常高的回收率。所有三种方法的样本间变异性都很低。
总之,为了对猪舍进行细菌采样,布被评估为首选材料,它价格便宜、操作简便、特异性强且易于使用,并且样本间变异性低。在评估马厩清洁情况时,ATP测量可能有潜在用途,然而,需要制定评估猪舍清洁情况的阈值。