Division of Psychiatry, University College London, Maple House, 149 Tottenham Ct Rd, W1T 7BN, London, UK.
NIHR Policy Research Unit in Mental Health, Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK.
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 Oct 31;24(1):1319. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11662-0.
Crisis cafés (also known as crisis sanctuaries or havens) are community-based services which support people in mental health crises, aiming to provide an informal, non-clinical and accessible setting. This model is increasingly popular in the UK; however, we are aware of no peer-reviewed literature focused on this model. We aimed to investigate the aims of crisis cafés, how they operate in practice and the factors that affect access to these services and implementation of the intended model.
A qualitative approach was used. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 12 managers of crisis cafés across England. These interviews explored managers' views on the implementation of their services, and the factors that help and hinder successful implementation. Data were analysed using Braun and Clarke's reflexive thematic approach.
We identified five main perceived aims for crisis cafés: providing an alternative to Emergency Departments; improving access to crisis care; providing people in acute distress with someone to talk to in a safe and comfortable space; triaging effectively; and improving crisis planning and people's coping skills. Factors seen as influencing the effectiveness of crisis cafés included accessibility, being able to deliver person-centred care, relationships with other services, and staffing. These factors could both help and hinder access to care and the implementation of the intended model. There were a number of trade-offs that services had to consider when designing and running a crisis café: (1) Balancing an open-door policy with managing demand for the service through referral routes, (2) Balancing risk management procedures with the remit of offering a non-clinical environment and (3) Increasing awareness of the service in the community whilst avoiding stigmatising perceptions of it.
Findings illustrate the aims of the crisis café model of care and factors which are influential in its implementation in current practice. Future research is needed to evaluate the efficacy of these services in relation to their aims. Crisis café service users' views, and views of stakeholders from the wider crisis care system should also be ascertained.
危机咖啡馆(也称为危机避难所或避难所)是一种基于社区的服务,旨在为处于心理健康危机中的人们提供一个非正式、非临床和易于获得的环境。这种模式在英国越来越受欢迎;然而,我们没有发现任何专门针对这种模式的同行评议文献。我们旨在调查危机咖啡馆的目的、它们在实践中的运作方式以及影响这些服务获取和预期模式实施的因素。
采用定性方法。对英格兰 12 家危机咖啡馆的经理进行了半结构化访谈。这些访谈探讨了经理对其服务实施的看法,以及有助于和阻碍成功实施的因素。使用 Braun 和 Clarke 的反思性主题方法对数据进行了分析。
我们确定了危机咖啡馆的五个主要预期目标:提供替代急诊部门的选择;改善危机护理的可及性;为处于急性困境中的人们提供一个安全舒适的空间与他人交谈;有效地分诊;以及改善危机规划和人们的应对技能。被认为影响危机咖啡馆有效性的因素包括可及性、提供以个人为中心的护理的能力、与其他服务的关系以及人员配备。这些因素既可以帮助也可以阻碍人们获得护理和实施预期模式。在设计和运营危机咖啡馆时,服务必须考虑一些权衡:(1)平衡开放政策与通过转介途径管理对服务的需求,(2)平衡风险管理程序与提供非临床环境的任务,以及(3)提高社区对服务的认识,同时避免对其产生污名化的看法。
研究结果说明了危机咖啡馆护理模式的目标以及对其在当前实践中实施有影响的因素。需要进一步研究评估这些服务在实现其目标方面的疗效。还应该确定危机咖啡馆服务使用者的观点,以及来自更广泛危机护理系统的利益相关者的观点。