Shekara Aniruddha, Ross Alexander, Soper Daniel J, Paulk Angelique C, Cash Sydney S, Shear Paula K, Sheehy John P, Basu Ishita
Department of Neurosurgery, University of Cincinnati College of Medicine, Cincinnati, OH 45267, USA.
Department of Biomedical Engineering, University of Cincinnati College of Engineering and Applied Science, Cincinnati, OH 45219, USA.
bioRxiv. 2024 Oct 24:2024.10.10.617540. doi: 10.1101/2024.10.10.617540.
Anxiety and depressive disorders are associated with cognitive control deficits, yet their underlying neural mechanisms remain poorly understood. Here, we used high-resolution stereotactic EEG (sEEG) to determine how anxiety and/or depression modulates neural and behavioral responses when cognitive control is engaged in individuals with medically refractory epilepsy undergoing sEEG monitoring for surgical evaluation. We analyzed sEEG data recorded from frontotemporal regions of 29 participants (age range: 19-55, mean age: 35.5, female: 16/29) while they performed a Multi-Source Interference Task (MSIT) designed to elicit cognitive conflict. Neurobehavioral interviews, symptom rating scales, and clinical documentation were used to categorize participants as demonstrating anxiety and/or depression symptoms (A/D, n=13) or as epilepsy controls (EC, n=16). Generalized linear mixed-effects (GLME) models were used to analyze behavioral and neural data. Models of oscillatory power were used to identify brain regions within conflict-encoding networks in which coherence and phase locking values (PLV) were examined in A/D and EC. A/D participants demonstrated a greater conflict effect (response time slowing with higher cognitive load), without impairment in response time (RT) or accuracy compared to EC. A/D participants also showed significantly enhanced conflict-evoked theta (4-8Hz) and alpha (8-15Hz) power in the dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (dlPFC) and amygdala as well as widespread broadband activity in the lateral temporal lobe (LTL) compared to EC. Additionally, theta coherence and PLV between dlPFC-LTL and dlPFC-amygdala were reduced by conflict in A/D. Our findings suggest individuals with anxiety/depression symptoms exhibit heightened frontotemporal oscillatory activity and disrupted frontotemporal synchrony during cognitive conflict encoding, which may indicate a greater need for cognitive resources due to ineffective cognitive processing. These results highlight a potential role of frontotemporal circuits in conflict encoding that are altered in anxiety/depression, and may further inform future therapeutic interventions aimed at enhancing cognitive control in these populations.
焦虑症和抑郁症与认知控制缺陷有关,但其潜在的神经机制仍知之甚少。在这里,我们使用高分辨率立体定向脑电图(sEEG)来确定焦虑和/或抑郁如何调节接受sEEG监测以进行手术评估的药物难治性癫痫患者在进行认知控制时的神经和行为反应。我们分析了29名参与者(年龄范围:19 - 55岁,平均年龄:35.5岁,女性:16/29)在执行旨在引发认知冲突的多源干扰任务(MSIT)时从额颞区域记录的sEEG数据。通过神经行为访谈、症状评定量表和临床记录,将参与者分类为表现出焦虑和/或抑郁症状(A/D,n = 13)或癫痫对照组(EC,n = 16)。使用广义线性混合效应(GLME)模型分析行为和神经数据。振荡功率模型用于识别冲突编码网络中的脑区,在这些脑区中对A/D组和EC组的相干性和锁相值(PLV)进行了检查。与EC组相比,A/D组参与者表现出更大的冲突效应(随着认知负荷增加反应时间减慢),但反应时间(RT)或准确性没有受损。与EC组相比,A/D组参与者在背外侧前额叶皮层(dlPFC)和杏仁核中还表现出冲突诱发的θ波(4 - 8Hz)和α波(8 - 15Hz)功率显著增强,以及颞叶外侧(LTL)广泛的宽带活动。此外,A/D组中冲突会降低dlPFC - LTL和dlPFC - 杏仁核之间的θ波相干性和PLV。我们的研究结果表明,有焦虑/抑郁症状的个体在认知冲突编码期间表现出额颞振荡活动增强和额颞同步性破坏,这可能表明由于认知处理无效而对认知资源有更大需求。这些结果突出了额颞回路在冲突编码中的潜在作用,这些回路在焦虑/抑郁中发生了改变,并且可能进一步为旨在增强这些人群认知控制的未来治疗干预提供信息。