Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine School of Medicine, Orange, California, USA.
Department of Emergency Medicine, Yale University School of Medicine, Yale Developmental Neurocognitive Driving Simulation Research Center (DrivSim Lab), New Haven, Connecticut, USA.
Traffic Inj Prev. 2024;25(sup1):S15-S24. doi: 10.1080/15389588.2024.2368595. Epub 2024 Nov 1.
To contextually examine facilitators of young driver decisions to ride with an impaired driver (RWI) or drive while impaired (DWI).
Data were from the NIH's NEXT Generation Health Study (NEXT), a 7-year longitudinal nationally representative study with a U.S. probability cohort of 10th graders starting in 2009-2010. Using a multistage sequential explanatory mixed methods approach, we conducted latent class analysis ( = 2,783) to identify RWI/DWI trajectories from adolescence to young adulthood (Stage-1). We then conducted in-depth qualitative interviews with purposively sampled young adults ( = 105, 26.30 ± 0.43 y/o) from four identified RWI/DWI trajectory classes (Stage-2): 31 Abstainers (consistently low probability), 33 Escalators (low-to-high probability), 14 Decliners (high-to-low probability), and 27 Persisters (consistently high probability). In Stage-2, the qualitative interview guide was informed by Stage-1 findings and Ecodevelopmental Theory. Using directed content analysis, we applied inductive and deductive theory-grounded codes to interview transcripts. With data immersion, reflexivity, and team dialogue, we derived themes from the code, "Facilitators of RWI and/or DWI". Demographics and validated measures of resiliency, health-related quality of life, Timeline Follow Back for alcohol and marijuana, and recent engagement in RWI/DWI were collected during the interviews.
Based on the interview transcripts, five themes emerged around RWI/DWI facilitators during and after high school: (1) beliefs about alcohol/drug effects; (2) trust of others; (3) trust of self; (4) parental disapproval; and (5) transportation factors. Participants who RWI confidently placed their trust in their assessment of the driver's impairment and their own in the context of close relationships. Those who DWI described desire to maintain simple/easy vehicle access while avoiding tickets/towing. The joint display of the quantitative and qualitative data is presented.
Notable misperceptions exist about how alcohol/drugs impact driving in the RWI/DWI context, particularly regarding the subtle signs of impairment. Youth commonly relied on their own assessment of impairment before driving themselves or riding with a potentially impaired driver, sometimes to avoid parental disapproval. Some engage in RWI/DWI to avoid discord with parents. DWI may relate to needing easy/immediate vehicle access. Pragmatic remedy considerations could include educating youth and young drivers about impairment, enhancing safe public transportation, and expanding ride-share programing.
从语境角度探讨年轻人决定搭载醉酒司机(RWI)或自己醉酒驾驶(DWI)的因素。
数据来自 NIH 的下一代健康研究(NEXT),这是一项为期 7 年的全国代表性纵向研究,在美国概率队列中对 2009-2010 年开始的 10 年级学生进行研究。我们采用多阶段顺序解释性混合方法,对 10 名青少年( = 2783)进行潜在类别分析,以确定从青春期到青年期的 RWI/DWI 轨迹(阶段 1)。然后,我们对来自四个 RWI/DWI 轨迹类别的有针对性抽样的年轻成年人( = 105,26.30±0.43 岁)进行了深入的定性访谈(阶段 2):31 名不参与者(始终处于低概率)、33 名升级者(低至高概率)、14 名下降者(高至低概率)和 27 名持续者(始终处于高概率)。在阶段 2 中,定性访谈指南由阶段 1 的发现和生态发展理论提供信息。我们使用定向内容分析,对访谈记录应用归纳和演绎理论基础代码。通过数据沉浸、反思和团队对话,我们从代码“促进 RWI 和/或 DWI 的因素”中得出主题。在访谈期间,收集了与韧性、与健康相关的生活质量、酒精和大麻的时间线回溯、最近参与 RWI/DWI 相关的验证措施以及人口统计学数据。
根据访谈记录,在高中期间和之后,出现了五个与 RWI/DWI 促进因素有关的主题:(1)对酒精/药物影响的信念;(2)对他人的信任;(3)对自己的信任;(4)父母的反对;(5)交通因素。RWI 的参与者对自己对司机的醉酒评估和自己在亲密关系中的醉酒评估充满信心。那些 DWI 的人描述了想要保持简单/容易获得车辆,同时避免罚单/拖走。呈现了定量和定性数据的联合。
在 RWI/DWI 背景下,人们对酒精/药物如何影响驾驶存在明显的误解,特别是关于醉酒的微妙迹象。年轻人在自己开车或搭载可能醉酒的司机之前,通常会根据自己对醉酒的评估,有时是为了避免父母的反对。一些人参与 RWI/DWI 是为了避免与父母发生冲突。DWI 可能与需要方便/即时的车辆通道有关。实用的补救措施考虑因素可能包括教育青年和年轻司机有关醉酒的知识,增强安全的公共交通,并扩大拼车计划。