• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在苏格兰招募和留住医疗保健工作者参与一项 COVID-19 纵向研究:描述性分析。

Recruiting and retaining healthcare workers in Scotland to a longitudinal COVID-19 study: a descriptive analysis.

机构信息

Public Health Scotland, Glasgow, UK.

Glasgow Caledonian University, Glasgow, UK.

出版信息

BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02380-6.

DOI:10.1186/s12874-024-02380-6
PMID:39487406
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11529010/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Rapid timescales for the design and delivery of research were common during the COVID-19 pandemic. The recruitment and retention of healthcare workers (HCWs) as participants in research studies are notoriously challenging, but this was exacerbated during the pandemic by the unprecedented demand placed on the workforce. The SARS-CoV-2 Immunity and Reinfection Evaluation (SIREN study) is a prospective multicentre cohort study following HCWs in the UK. This paper discusses the strategies and challenges associated with recruitment and retention of HCW participants in Scotland.

METHODS

There were 44,546 HCWs recruited to the SIREN study, of whom 6,285 were recruited by research teams at ten different research sites in Scotland between October 2020 and March 2021. Information on target and actual sample size, availability of resource, recruitment rate, and recruitment and engagement strategies by site was collated from SIREN study documentation and discussions with local key SIREN site staff. Individual-level data from 6,153 HCW participants with ongoing consent for all data usage were also collated, including socio-demographic data and information on withdrawal (in first year) and opt-in to a study extension after one year. Factors associated with these outcomes were explored in logistic regression analyses.

RESULTS

Different recruitment strategies were used in each site according to local agreements, protocol and staff capacity, with the recruitment period ranging from 13 to 160 days. The locally-agreed recruitment target was met in four sites. The proportion of participants who withdrew in the first year ranged from 3.1 to 24.8% by site, while subsequent opt-in to a 12-month study extension ranged from 28.6 to 74.8%. The sites with the highest proportions of withdrawals were the same four sites with lowest proportions of opt-in. On an individual level, there was a lower level of retention among younger participants, and those from lower socio-economic backgrounds and minority ethnic groups.

CONCLUSIONS

Site-specific factors including research-readiness likely had a significant influence on recruitment and retention, more so than the specific recruitment or retention strategies employed. Independent of site factors, individual-level variables influenced recruitment and retention, suggesting targeted strategies may be needed to promote research engagement among particular socio-demographic groups.

摘要

背景

在 COVID-19 大流行期间,研究的设计和交付时间通常非常紧迫。招募和保留医疗保健工作者(HCWs)作为研究参与者是一项极具挑战性的工作,但在大流行期间,由于对劳动力的需求空前增加,这一挑战更加严峻。SARS-CoV-2 免疫和再感染评估(SIREN 研究)是一项在英国对 HCWs 进行的前瞻性多中心队列研究。本文讨论了在苏格兰招募和保留 HCW 参与者的策略和挑战。

方法

有 44546 名 HCWs 被招募到 SIREN 研究中,其中 6285 名是在 2020 年 10 月至 2021 年 3 月期间由苏格兰 10 个不同研究地点的研究团队招募的。从 SIREN 研究文件和与当地 SIREN 主要研究地点工作人员的讨论中收集了有关目标和实际样本量、资源可用性、招募率以及各地点的招募和参与策略的信息。还从 6153 名持续同意所有数据使用的 HCW 参与者的个人水平数据中进行了汇总,包括社会人口统计学数据以及关于第一年退出(第一年)和在一年后选择加入研究扩展的信息。使用逻辑回归分析探讨了这些结果的相关因素。

结果

根据当地协议、方案和员工能力,每个地点使用不同的招募策略,招募期从 13 天到 160 天不等。有四个地点达到了当地商定的招募目标。第一年退出的参与者比例因地点而异,从 3.1%到 24.8%不等,而随后选择参加为期 12 个月的研究扩展的比例从 28.6%到 74.8%不等。退出比例最高的四个地点也是选择参加研究扩展比例最低的四个地点。在个人层面上,年轻参与者以及社会经济背景较低和少数族裔群体的保留率较低。

结论

包括研究准备情况在内的特定地点因素可能对招募和保留有重大影响,其影响大于所采用的具体招募或保留策略。独立于地点因素,个体水平变量影响招募和保留,这表明需要针对特定社会人口统计学群体制定有针对性的策略来促进研究参与。

相似文献

1
Recruiting and retaining healthcare workers in Scotland to a longitudinal COVID-19 study: a descriptive analysis.在苏格兰招募和留住医疗保健工作者参与一项 COVID-19 纵向研究:描述性分析。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2024 Nov 1;24(1):265. doi: 10.1186/s12874-024-02380-6.
2
Cohort retention in a pandemic response study: lessons from the SARS-CoV2 Immunity & Reinfection Evaluation (SIREN) study.大流行应对研究中的队列保留:来自SARS-CoV2免疫与再感染评估(SIREN)研究的经验教训。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2025 Jan 30;25(1):27. doi: 10.1186/s12874-025-02469-6.
3
Risk factors associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection in a multiethnic cohort of United Kingdom healthcare workers (UK-REACH): A cross-sectional analysis.与英国医疗保健工作者多民族队列中 SARS-CoV-2 感染相关的风险因素(UK-REACH):一项横断面分析。
PLoS Med. 2022 May 26;19(5):e1004015. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1004015. eCollection 2022 May.
4
A longitudinal qualitative exploration of victorian healthcare workers' and organisations' evolving views and experiences during COVID-19.一项针对维多利亚时代医疗工作者及其组织在 COVID-19 期间不断变化的观点和经验的纵向定性探索。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2024 May 7;24(1):596. doi: 10.1186/s12913-024-11067-z.
5
SARS-CoV-2 infection rates of antibody-positive compared with antibody-negative health-care workers in England: a large, multicentre, prospective cohort study (SIREN).英格兰抗体阳性与抗体阴性医护人员的 SARS-CoV-2 感染率:一项大型、多中心、前瞻性队列研究(SIREN)。
Lancet. 2021 Apr 17;397(10283):1459-1469. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(21)00675-9. Epub 2021 Apr 9.
6
Risk of SARS-CoV-2 infection before and after the Omicron wave in a cohort of healthcare workers in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省一组医护人员在奥密克戎毒株浪潮前后感染新冠病毒的风险。
BMC Infect Dis. 2025 Feb 7;25(1):183. doi: 10.1186/s12879-025-10580-8.
7
Burden of SARS-CoV-2 infection in healthcare workers during second wave in England and impact of vaccines: prospective multicentre cohort study (SIREN) and mathematical model.英格兰第二波疫情期间医护人员感染 SARS-CoV-2 的负担和疫苗的影响:前瞻性多中心队列研究(SIREN)和数学模型。
BMJ. 2022 Jul 20;378:e070379. doi: 10.1136/bmj-2022-070379.
8
Safety and Efficacy of Imatinib for Hospitalized Adults with COVID-19: A structured summary of a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.COVID-19 住院成人患者使用伊马替尼的安全性和疗效:一项随机对照试验研究方案的结构化总结。
Trials. 2020 Oct 28;21(1):897. doi: 10.1186/s13063-020-04819-9.
9
Healthcare institutions' recommendation regarding the use of FFP-2 masks and SARS-CoV-2 seropositivity among healthcare workers: a multicenter longitudinal cohort study.医疗机构关于 FFP-2 口罩使用的建议和医护人员中 SARS-CoV-2 血清阳性率:一项多中心纵向队列研究。
Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2022 Jan 10;11(1):6. doi: 10.1186/s13756-021-01047-x.
10
Redeployment and changes in working patterns of healthcare workers during COVID-19 in the UK: a qualitative study.英国新冠疫情期间医护人员的重新调配与工作模式变化:一项定性研究
BMC Health Serv Res. 2025 Feb 18;25(1):267. doi: 10.1186/s12913-025-12389-2.

本文引用的文献

1
Reflections on recruiting healthcare professionals as research participants: Learning from the ONSPres Study.关于招募医疗保健专业人员作为研究参与者的思考:从ONSPres研究中学习。
HRB Open Res. 2022 Jun 27;5:47. doi: 10.12688/hrbopenres.13499.1. eCollection 2022.
2
Risk Perception towards COVID-19: A Systematic Review and Qualitative Synthesis.对 COVID-19 的风险感知:系统评价和定性综合。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Apr 12;19(8):4649. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19084649.
3
Recruitment methods and yield rates in a clinical trial of physical exercise for older adults with hypertension-HAEL Study: a study within a trial.一项针对高血压老年患者的身体锻炼临床试验的招募方法和收益率-HAEL 研究:一项嵌套试验研究。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2022 Feb 10;22(1):42. doi: 10.1186/s12874-022-01535-7.
4
Retaining trial participants: an individualised approach is needed.留住试验参与者:需要一种个性化的方法。
BMJ. 2022 Jan 17;376:o115. doi: 10.1136/bmj.o115.
5
Online Patient Recruitment in Clinical Trials: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.在线临床试验患者招募:系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Med Internet Res. 2020 Nov 4;22(11):e22179. doi: 10.2196/22179.
6
Recruitment and Retention of Older People in Clinical Research: A Systematic Literature Review.招募和保留老年人群参与临床研究:系统文献回顾。
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2020 Dec;68(12):2955-2963. doi: 10.1111/jgs.16875. Epub 2020 Oct 19.
7
Physical and mental health impacts of COVID-19 on healthcare workers: a scoping review.新型冠状病毒肺炎对医护人员身心健康的影响:一项范围综述
Int J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul 20;13(1):40. doi: 10.1186/s12245-020-00299-5.
8
Recruitment and retention of participants in clinical studies: Critical issues and challenges.临床研究中参与者的招募与留存:关键问题与挑战
Perspect Clin Res. 2020 Apr-Jun;11(2):51-53. doi: 10.4103/picr.PICR_6_20. Epub 2020 May 6.
9
Areas of academic research with the impact of COVID-19.受 COVID-19 影响的学术研究领域。
Am J Emerg Med. 2020 Jul;38(7):1524-1526. doi: 10.1016/j.ajem.2020.04.022. Epub 2020 Apr 15.
10
Participant retention practices in longitudinal clinical research studies with high retention rates.高保留率的纵向临床研究中的受试者保留措施。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2017 Feb 20;17(1):30. doi: 10.1186/s12874-017-0310-z.