Ni Yuanlu, Cong Yang, Zhao Chengqian, Yu Jinhua, Wang Yin, Zhou Guohui, Shen Mengjun
Department of Biomedical Engineering, School of Information Science and Technology, Fudan University, Shanghai, 200438, China.
Department of Ultrasonography, Shanghai Pulmonary Hospital, School of Medicine, Tongji University, Shanghai, 200433, China.
Comput Med Imaging Graph. 2024 Dec;118:102454. doi: 10.1016/j.compmedimag.2024.102454. Epub 2024 Oct 24.
There are several main patterns in lung ultrasound (LUS) images, including A-lines, B-lines, consolidation and pleural effusion. LUS images of healthy lungs typically only exhibit A-lines, while other patterns may emerge or coexist in LUS images associated with different lung diseases. The accurate categorization of these primary patterns is pivotal for effective lung disease screening. However, two challenges complicate the classification task: the first is the inherent blurring of feature differences between main patterns due to ultrasound imaging properties; and the second is the potential coexistence of multiple patterns in a single case, with only the most dominant pattern being clinically annotated. To address these challenges, we propose the active learning based on multi-enhanced views (MEVAL) method to achieve more precise pattern classification in LUS. To accentuate feature differences between multiple patterns, we introduce a feature enhancement module by applying vertical linear fitting and k-means clustering. The multi-enhanced views are then employed in parallel with the original images, thus enhancing MEVAL's awareness of feature differences between multiple patterns. To tackle the patterns coexistence issue, we propose an active learning strategy based on confidence sets and misclassified sets. This strategy enables the network to simultaneously recognize multiple patterns by selectively labeling of a small number of images. Our dataset comprises 5075 LUS images, with approximately 4% exhibiting multiple patterns. Experimental results showcase the effectiveness of the proposed method in the classification task, with accuracy of 98.72%, AUC of 0.9989, sensitivity of 98.76%, and specificity of 98.16%, which outperforms than the state-of-the-art deep learning-based methods. A series of comprehensive ablation studies suggest the effectiveness of each proposed component and show great potential in clinical application.
