Suppr超能文献

用于诊断左束支夺获的整体R波峰时间。

Global R-wave peak time for diagnosis of left bundle branch capture.

作者信息

Kiełbasa Grzegorz, Moskal Paweł, Bednarek Agnieszka, Jastrzębski Ignacy, Michel Patryk Stanisław, Rajzer Marek, Jastrzębski Marek

机构信息

First Department of Cardiology, Interventional Electrocardiology and Hypertension, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow, Poland.

Electrophysiology Laboratory, University Hospital in Krakow, Krakow, Poland.

出版信息

Heart Rhythm. 2024 Oct 25. doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2024.10.038.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

QRS axis deviation and rS configuration in V6 affect the ability of V6 R-wave peak time (RWPT) criterion to discriminate capture type during left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP).

OBJECTIVE

We hypothesized that combining RWPTs from lateral leads: I, aVL, V5, and V6 may better reflect left ventricular activation time and that such a global RWPT may be insensitive to changes in QRS configuration.

METHODS

The analysis included 519 electrocardiograms (ECGs) with nonselective left bundle branch pacing (nsLBBP) and 176 ECGs with left ventricular septal pacing (LVSP). Optimal RWPT cutoffs and area under the receiver operating curve (AUC) were determined for each lead and combinations of leads, to find the best RWPT criterion for discriminating nsLBBP from LVSP. Values were reported separately for healthy and diseased left conduction system groups.

RESULTS

The highest AUC of 97.1/89.2% was obtained for the global RWPT, which combined leads I and V6. The AUC for single-lead RWPT, was highest for lead I, followed by V6, V5, and aVL with AUC of 95.1/87.4%, 93.6/87.1%, 93.0/86.5%, and 84.8/74.6%, respectively. The global RWPT criterion was not affected by variations in QRS configuration, as V6 and I RWPTs often showed opposite responses to changes in axis. In contrast, all single-lead RWPT criteria were sensitive to axis deviation and QRS configuration. Diagnostically optimal RWPT cutoffs for global RWPT and lead I RWPT were 162.5/187.5 ms, and 81.5/90.5 ms, respectively.

CONCLUSION

The global RWPT criterion allows a more accurate diagnosis of LBBAP capture type independent of QRS configuration and axis.

摘要

背景

V6导联的QRS电轴偏移和rS形态会影响V6导联R波峰时间(RWPT)标准在左束支区域起搏(LBBAP)期间区分起搏捕获类型的能力。

目的

我们假设将来自外侧导联I、aVL、V5和V6的RWPTs相结合,可能能更好地反映左心室激活时间,并且这种整体RWPT可能对QRS形态的变化不敏感。

方法

分析纳入了519份非选择性左束支起搏(nsLBBP)心电图和176份左心室间隔起搏(LVSP)心电图。确定每个导联及其导联组合的最佳RWPT截止值和受试者工作特征曲线下面积(AUC),以找到区分nsLBBP和LVSP的最佳RWPT标准。分别报告健康和病变左传导系统组的数值。

结果

整体RWPT(结合导联I和V6)获得了最高的AUC,分别为97.1/89.2%。单导联RWPT的AUC,导联I最高,其次是V6、V5和aVL,AUC分别为95.1/87.4%、93.6/87.1%、93.0/86.5%和84.8/74.6%。整体RWPT标准不受QRS形态变化的影响,因为V6和I导联的RWPTs对电轴变化常表现出相反的反应。相比之下,所有单导联RWPT标准对电轴偏移和QRS形态均敏感。整体RWPT和导联I RWPT的诊断最佳RWPT截止值分别为162.5/187.5 ms和81.5/90.5 ms。

结论

整体RWPT标准能够更准确地诊断LBBAP捕获类型,且不受QRS形态和电轴的影响。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验